Message ID | 20181025144644.15464-67-cota@braap.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD44613A4 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0682BA33 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9DBE12BA4D; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FB52BA33 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1gFh77-0005FX-IT for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:59:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gFh5J-0003Zd-BK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:58:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gFgvP-0008OT-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:47:52 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:48479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1gFgvO-0008BN-Uw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:47:51 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88140221DD; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:47:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:47:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=braap.org; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; s= mesmtp; bh=6ONHjaNfm3oSQRF6S1lHI7ZyJsqnMz7XfwyZKvSlGhY=; b=UM+gR +Le74xykPIpZH+47PVUa7pv7000DH918naeonpxtPqix6nDGhMxm+nOLBhrYSX/W lN2rYFX0MS7nvb7++cYBcrLmKcmB7xD8AsiordpN9fWKmb/TcwPrhusjSCxCAo0h q7EXh0C1qjQxDd8WYFARu8sfOFLtGQMzWV4QHY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=6ONHjaNfm3oSQRF6S1lHI7ZyJsqnM z7XfwyZKvSlGhY=; b=dOw50BgQud7MGaQHLR7v9YHiat7UTFiPPpM0MvjE6rCRh 4nUhpMVd02P6weaKER6YB7ErQU5eJekrjpKr+nNpz4AcTP5sj5DBq3uHhUhCpBev WkWuub7svQs9oxEob0cW4vbJYIVa6Mq2N+84DXG/BmW4kOvG4xxePSKnhThzgbJ1 iTYnx3qlGsfJXUZnLqEraOoFNpVk8/ZUXilUCT/zZPRATvN9WlxbnQcDbk9/Illf XaXwTzSJLRPEdzr/hIUZBlmsoiaVy/OSMjaad/++FDMDUWBjNihJRCJUgw1Y90PW J0lWNBboJpeQ/tYrIJNmNfzF9KqtH46Nxqz4RZLXw== X-ME-Sender: <xms:atfRW0ayUSEWjFxxQRj4AGqIDmZq9Fb_EPCiAF8FavVycT8EVrvlzw> X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:atfRW4exkeA2lrrLl1t--iuxZSFE5Xo_NLCY23IS18btG33WDeS8iQ> <xmx:atfRW9jOjTSPg3cKpTTtGHR99VwRoCyTfvGi3Gpe3wbh2fQCuauYyA> <xmx:atfRW9nLjtWlvzzAsy3B8OnSOfRqJ_u3I8kXaPvOmSBkACNk8i_CUg> <xmx:atfRW0ULzYc9OankHWE8AUd0BZcJDoSh5Gfz6NRa4swFKdw3d5-UQg> <xmx:atfRW6oN3pMyQzFh-au0dx2EMySP2gFiV4H2RmSWiKa4Yl0cKXxZrQ> <xmx:atfRWxCanZxdMc6HIyoOxEgO1d70yQqSRxy37RT_krpdjOmSuuQBBw> Received: from localhost (flamenco.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.20.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 39CC1E44D4; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:47:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:46:40 -0400 Message-Id: <20181025144644.15464-67-cota@braap.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181025144644.15464-1-cota@braap.org> References: <20181025144644.15464-1-cota@braap.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v4 67/71] cpus-common: release BQL earlier in run_on_cpu X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
Series |
[RFC,v4,01/71] cpu: convert queued work to a QSIMPLEQ
|
expand
|
On 10/25/18 3:46 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > After completing the conversion to per-CPU locks, there is no need > to release the BQL after having called cpu_kick. > > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org> > --- > cpus-common.c | 20 +++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
diff --git a/cpus-common.c b/cpus-common.c index c2ad554d54..80d7e300eb 100644 --- a/cpus-common.c +++ b/cpus-common.c @@ -145,6 +145,11 @@ void run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data) return; } + /* We are going to sleep on the CPU lock, so release the BQL */ + if (has_bql) { + qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(); + } + wi.func = func; wi.data = data; wi.done = false; @@ -153,21 +158,6 @@ void run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data) cpu_mutex_lock(cpu); queue_work_on_cpu_locked(cpu, &wi); - - /* - * We are going to sleep on the CPU lock, so release the BQL. - * - * During the transition to per-CPU locks, we release the BQL _after_ - * having kicked the destination CPU (from queue_work_on_cpu_locked above). - * This makes sure that the enqueued work will be seen by the CPU - * after being woken up from the kick, since the CPU sleeps on the BQL. - * Once we complete the transition to per-CPU locks, we will release - * the BQL earlier in this function. - */ - if (has_bql) { - qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(); - } - while (!atomic_mb_read(&wi.done)) { CPUState *self_cpu = current_cpu;
After completing the conversion to per-CPU locks, there is no need to release the BQL after having called cpu_kick. Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org> --- cpus-common.c | 20 +++++--------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)