Message ID | 20181031230554.1660-3-niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
Headers | show |
Series | mmc: tmio: fix reset operation | expand |
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:05:53AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > SD / MMC did not operate properly when suspend transition failed. > Because the SCC was not reset at resume, issue of the command failed. > Call the host specific reset function and reset the hardware in order to > add reset of SCC. This change also fixes tuning on some stubborn cards > on Gen2. > > Based on work from Masaharu Hayakawa. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> wrote: > > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > SD / MMC did not operate properly when suspend transition failed. > Because the SCC was not reset at resume, issue of the command failed. > Call the host specific reset function and reset the hardware in order to > add reset of SCC. This change also fixes tuning on some stubborn cards > on Gen2. > > Based on work from Masaharu Hayakawa. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > --- > * Changes sine v1 > - Merge tmio_mmc_reset() into tmio_mmc_hw_reset() as it's now the only > caller. > > * Changes since v2 > - Rebased on mmc/next caused small refactoring of the code. > --- > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > index 953562a12a0d6ebc..662161be03b6d52e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > @@ -171,6 +171,18 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset(struct tmio_mmc_host *host) > } > } > > +static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) > +{ > + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > + > + host->reset(host); > + > + tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); > + > + if (host->hw_reset) > + host->hw_reset(host); > +} > + > static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = container_of(work, struct tmio_mmc_host, > @@ -209,7 +221,7 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); > > - host->reset(host); > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); > > /* Ready for new calls */ > host->mrq = NULL; I see tmio_mmc_abort_dma() a few lines below. If you add tmio_mmc_abort_dma() into tmio_mmc_hw_reset(), you do not need to abort DMA twice, don't you? tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); /* Ready for new calls */ host->mrq = NULL; tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); /* <-- abort DMA again? */ mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq); } > @@ -696,14 +708,6 @@ static int tmio_mmc_start_data(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, > return 0; > } > > -static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) > -{ > - struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > - > - if (host->hw_reset) > - host->hw_reset(host); > -} > - > static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode) > { > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > @@ -1228,7 +1232,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host) > _host->sdio_irq_mask = TMIO_SDIO_MASK_ALL; > > _host->set_clock(_host, 0); > - _host->reset(_host); > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(mmc); I think it is weird to call tmio_mmc_abort_dma() before tmio_mmc_request_dma(). > _host->sdcard_irq_mask = sd_ctrl_read16_and_16_as_32(_host, CTL_IRQ_MASK); > tmio_mmc_disable_mmc_irqs(_host, TMIO_MASK_ALL); > @@ -1329,7 +1333,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > tmio_mmc_clk_enable(host); > - host->reset(host); > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); > > if (host->clk_cache) > host->set_clock(host, host->clk_cache); > -- > 2.19.1 > -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
Hi Yamada-san, Thanks for your feedback. On 2018-11-02 15:54:17 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Niklas Söderlund > <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se> wrote: > > > > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > > > SD / MMC did not operate properly when suspend transition failed. > > Because the SCC was not reset at resume, issue of the command failed. > > Call the host specific reset function and reset the hardware in order to > > add reset of SCC. This change also fixes tuning on some stubborn cards > > on Gen2. > > > > Based on work from Masaharu Hayakawa. > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> > > > > --- > > * Changes sine v1 > > - Merge tmio_mmc_reset() into tmio_mmc_hw_reset() as it's now the only > > caller. > > > > * Changes since v2 > > - Rebased on mmc/next caused small refactoring of the code. > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > index 953562a12a0d6ebc..662161be03b6d52e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c > > @@ -171,6 +171,18 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset(struct tmio_mmc_host *host) > > } > > } > > > > +static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) > > +{ > > + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > > + > > + host->reset(host); > > + > > + tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); > > + > > + if (host->hw_reset) > > + host->hw_reset(host); > > +} > > + > > static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) > > { > > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = container_of(work, struct tmio_mmc_host, > > @@ -209,7 +221,7 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); > > > > - host->reset(host); > > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); > > > > /* Ready for new calls */ > > host->mrq = NULL; > > > > I see tmio_mmc_abort_dma() a few lines below. > > If you add tmio_mmc_abort_dma() into tmio_mmc_hw_reset(), > you do not need to abort DMA twice, don't you? > > > > > tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); > > /* Ready for new calls */ > host->mrq = NULL; > > tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); /* <-- abort DMA again? */ > mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq); > } > You are correct with this change the call to tmio_mmc_abort_dma() can be dropped here. Will do so and send out a new version. Thanks for pointing this out! > > > @@ -696,14 +708,6 @@ static int tmio_mmc_start_data(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) > > -{ > > - struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > > - > > - if (host->hw_reset) > > - host->hw_reset(host); > > -} > > - > > static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode) > > { > > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > > @@ -1228,7 +1232,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host) > > _host->sdio_irq_mask = TMIO_SDIO_MASK_ALL; > > > > _host->set_clock(_host, 0); > > - _host->reset(_host); > > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(mmc); > > > I think it is weird to call tmio_mmc_abort_dma() > before tmio_mmc_request_dma(). > > > > > > > _host->sdcard_irq_mask = sd_ctrl_read16_and_16_as_32(_host, CTL_IRQ_MASK); > > tmio_mmc_disable_mmc_irqs(_host, TMIO_MASK_ALL); > > @@ -1329,7 +1333,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > > struct tmio_mmc_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > tmio_mmc_clk_enable(host); > > - host->reset(host); > > + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); > > > > if (host->clk_cache) > > host->set_clock(host, host->clk_cache); > > -- > > 2.19.1 > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c index 953562a12a0d6ebc..662161be03b6d52e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c @@ -171,6 +171,18 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset(struct tmio_mmc_host *host) } } +static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) +{ + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); + + host->reset(host); + + tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); + + if (host->hw_reset) + host->hw_reset(host); +} + static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct tmio_mmc_host *host = container_of(work, struct tmio_mmc_host, @@ -209,7 +221,7 @@ static void tmio_mmc_reset_work(struct work_struct *work) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); - host->reset(host); + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); /* Ready for new calls */ host->mrq = NULL; @@ -696,14 +708,6 @@ static int tmio_mmc_start_data(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, return 0; } -static void tmio_mmc_hw_reset(struct mmc_host *mmc) -{ - struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); - - if (host->hw_reset) - host->hw_reset(host); -} - static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode) { struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); @@ -1228,7 +1232,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host) _host->sdio_irq_mask = TMIO_SDIO_MASK_ALL; _host->set_clock(_host, 0); - _host->reset(_host); + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(mmc); _host->sdcard_irq_mask = sd_ctrl_read16_and_16_as_32(_host, CTL_IRQ_MASK); tmio_mmc_disable_mmc_irqs(_host, TMIO_MASK_ALL); @@ -1329,7 +1333,7 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) struct tmio_mmc_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev); tmio_mmc_clk_enable(host); - host->reset(host); + tmio_mmc_hw_reset(host->mmc); if (host->clk_cache) host->set_clock(host, host->clk_cache);