Message ID | 1545406240-3061-2-git-send-email-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | soc: fsl: add DPAA2 log console support | expand |
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. Shawn
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for DPAA2 > platforms > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. Should I resend this with the DTS patch the last? Ioana > > Shawn
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for DPAA2 > > platforms > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > > > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > > > DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. > > Should I resend this with the DTS patch the last? You do not have to resend the series only for this. It's pretty much a suggestion for future posting. Shawn
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for DPAA2 > platforms > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for > > > DPAA2 platforms > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > > > > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > > > > > DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. > > > > Should I resend this with the DTS patch the last? > > You do not have to resend the series only for this. It's pretty much a suggestion > for future posting. Ok, thanks for the suggestion. Ioana
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for DPAA2 > > platforms > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for > > > > DPAA2 platforms > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > > > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > > > > > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > > > > > > > DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. > > > > > > Should I resend this with the DTS patch the last? > > > > You do not have to resend the series only for this. It's pretty much > > a suggestion for future posting. > One more thing, do you have any other feedback on the DTS part? I think the best path for this patch set is through Leo's fsl soc tree but of course we need an ack from the DTS part also. Thanks, Ioana
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:31:46PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for DPAA2 > > > platforms > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: add dpaa2-console node for > > > > > DPAA2 platforms > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:31:09PM +0000, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > > > > Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following > > > > > > DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> > > > > > > > > > > DTS patch generally goes to the last in a series. > > > > > > > > Should I resend this with the DTS patch the last? > > > > > > You do not have to resend the series only for this. It's pretty much > > > a suggestion for future posting. > > > > One more thing, do you have any other feedback on the DTS part? > I think the best path for this patch set is through Leo's fsl soc tree but of course we need an ack from the DTS part also. I do not see there is a hard dependency between driver and dts part, e.g. build error or causing regression. In that case, dts should just go via its channel. Shawn
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi index e73e55f..664e337 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi @@ -569,6 +569,11 @@ clock-names = "apb_pclk", "wdog_clk"; }; + dpaa2-console@0x08340020 { + compatible = "dpaa2-console"; + reg = <0x00000000 0x08340020 0 0x2>; + }; + fsl_mc: fsl-mc@80c000000 { compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc"; reg = <0x00000008 0x0c000000 0 0x40>, /* MC portal base */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi index d188774..6db6ea4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi @@ -333,6 +333,11 @@ }; }; + dpaa2-console@0x08340020 { + compatible = "dpaa2-console"; + reg = <0x00000000 0x08340020 0 0x2>; + }; + fsl_mc: fsl-mc@80c000000 { compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc"; reg = <0x00000008 0x0c000000 0 0x40>, /* MC portal base */
Add the dpaa2-console device tree node for the following DPAA2 based platforms: LS1088A, LS2080A and LS2088A. Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi | 5 +++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)