Message ID | 20190111180523.27862-13-afd@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Misc ION cleanups and adding unmapped heap | expand |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:21PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > When enabled the helpers functions for creating carveout and chunk heaps > should have declarations in the ION header. Why? No one calls these from what I can tell. Which makes me believe we should just delete the drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_carveout_heap.c and drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c files as there are no in-tree users? Any objection to me doing that? thanks, greg k-h
On 1/18/19 3:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:21PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> When enabled the helpers functions for creating carveout and chunk heaps >> should have declarations in the ION header. > > Why? No one calls these from what I can tell. > > Which makes me believe we should just delete the > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_carveout_heap.c and > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c files as there are no > in-tree users? > > Any objection to me doing that? > I use those when creating carveout heaps. My exporter is out of tree still as it uses DT and the proper bindings have not been agreed upon yet. These helpers also make good heap creation references, even if not called by anyone in-tree right now. Thanks, Andrew > thanks, > > greg k-h >
On 1/18/19 1:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:21PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> When enabled the helpers functions for creating carveout and chunk heaps >> should have declarations in the ION header. > > Why? No one calls these from what I can tell. > > Which makes me believe we should just delete the > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_carveout_heap.c and > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_chunk_heap.c files as there are no > in-tree users? > > Any objection to me doing that? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > I'd rather not delete it quite yet. Part of this entire thread is a discussion on how to let those heaps and associated function actually be called in some way in tree. I expect them to either get called in tree or be replaced. Thanks, Laura
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h index e291299fd35f..97b2876b165a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h @@ -308,4 +308,37 @@ void ion_page_pool_free(struct ion_page_pool *pool, struct page *page); int ion_page_pool_shrink(struct ion_page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_mask, int nr_to_scan); +#ifdef CONFIG_ION_CARVEOUT_HEAP +/** + * ion_carveout_heap_create + * @base: base address of carveout memory + * @size: size of carveout memory region + * + * Creates a carveout ion_heap using the passed in data + */ +struct ion_heap *ion_carveout_heap_create(phys_addr_t base, size_t size); +#else +static inline struct ion_heap *ion_carveout_heap_create(phys_addr_t base, size_t size) +{ + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); +} +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_ION_CHUNK_HEAP +/** + * ion_chunk_heap_create + * @base: base address of carveout memory + * @size: size of carveout memory region + * @chunk_size: minimum allocation granularity + * + * Creates a chunk ion_heap using the passed in data + */ +struct ion_heap *ion_chunk_heap_create(phys_addr_t base, size_t size, size_t chunk_size); +#else +static inline struct ion_heap *ion_chunk_heap_create(phys_addr_t base, size_t size, size_t chunk_size) +{ + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); +} +#endif + #endif /* _ION_H */
When enabled the helpers functions for creating carveout and chunk heaps should have declarations in the ION header. Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> --- drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)