diff mbox series

[net-next,v3,4/4] dt-bindings: net: freescale: enetc: Add connection bindings for ENETC ethernet nodes

Message ID 1550847859-17346-5-git-send-email-claudiu.manoil@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series enetc: Add mdio support and device tree nodes | expand

Commit Message

Claudiu Manoil Feb. 22, 2019, 3:04 p.m. UTC
Define connection bindings (external PHY connections and internal links)
for the ENETC on-chip ethernet controllers.

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
---
v3 - added this patch to the set

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt          | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) Feb. 22, 2019, 11:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> Define connection bindings (external PHY connections and internal links)
> for the ENETC on-chip ethernet controllers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
> ---
> v3 - added this patch to the set
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt          | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2fbb998
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
> +* ENETC ethernet nodes - external connection bindings
> +
> +The ENETC ethernet controllers are PCIe integrated endpoints
> +(IEPs), on-chip devices discoverable as standard PCIe endpoints,
> +integrated into Freescale SoCs.  The ENETC devices are self
> +contained, the information needed for device initialization
> +is available in hardware (PCIe ECAM area).  However, depending
> +on board design, their external connections are configurable.
> +As usual for SoCs, device tree nodes may be used to define these
> +external connections.  The rest of the document specifies how
> +external connections for ENETC ethernet controllers may be
> +defined via device tree nodes.
> +
> +Silicon (SoC) availability (<SoC name>: <SoC DT path/name>)
> +	- LS1028A: [arch/arm64]	[...]freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi

This doesn't belong in bindings.

> +
> +
> +* ENETC nodes
> +
> +Defined in the SoC device tree as "pci" child nodes of the
> +"pci-host-ecam-generic" compatible "pcie" parent node also known
> +as the Integrated Endpoint Root Complex (IERC) SoC node.

The host controller attachment is also outside the scope of this 
binding.

> +
> +Structure - example (LS1028A):
> +
> +	pcie@1f0000000 {
> +		compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		...
> +		enetc_port0: pci@0,0 {

The node name 'pci' is reserved for bridges. This should match the 
device class if possible (ethernet).

> +			reg = <0x000000 0 0 0 0>;
> +		};
> +		enetc_port1: pci@0,1 {
> +			reg = <0x000100 0 0 0 0>;
> +		};
> +		...
> +	}
> +
> +Each ENETC node has a device number and a function number (expressed
> +by its "reg" property and pci node name, i.e. "pci@0,1" represents
> +device number 0 and functions number 1).  Only the standard pci "reg"
> +property is needed here.

There should be a compatible too.

> +For easy reference, each ENETC node is tagged by a handle having the
> +following format:
> +
> +	"enetc_port<idx>"   where, idx = 0 .. n-1;
> +			    n - #of available ENETC nodes (Ports) on
> +				the given SoC.

These are just source labels, so really they can be anything.

> +
> +NOTES
> +i. The SoC H/W Reference Manual provides a mapping of the ENETC Port
> +numbers to the PCIe Device Number/ Function Number.
> +Example (LS1028):
> +	All ENETC PFs (PCIe Physical Functions) have Device Number 0.
> +	Port 0 - PF0 (pci@0,0)
> +	Port 1 - PF1 (pci@0,1)
> +	Port 2 - PF2 (pci@0,2)
> +	Port 3 - PF6 (pci@0,6)
> +
> +ii. The SoC H/W Reference Manual also defines which ENETC Ports may have
> +external connections (external ports) and which ones are internally
> +connected to a on-chip L2 switch for instance (internal ports).
> +
> +
> +* Defining connections for ENETC nodes
> +
> +To define external connections for the external ENETC Ports on a given
> +board/platform, the board device tree should include the SoC device tree
> +and reference the external ports by their "enetc_port<idx>" handle.

SoC vs. board files are convention, but not really part of the binding 
ABI.

> +
> +Following cases arise, defining all possible connection bindings:
> +
> +1) The ENETC Port is connected to a MDIO configurable PHY:
> +
> +	In this case, the ENETC node should include a "mdio" sub-node
> +	that in turn should contain the "phy" node describing the
> +	external phy.  ENETC Port node structure (example):
> +
> +	&enetc_port0 {

Please just show the full DT example, not separate chunks.

> +		phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>;
> +		phy-connection-type = "sgmii";
> +
> +		mdio {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +			sgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@2 {
> +				reg = <0x2>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	All properties are mandatory for this case, their bindings already
> +	defined (see ethernet.txt and phy.txt).
> +
> +2) The ENETC Port has a fixed-link connection:
> +
> +	In this case, the ENETC Port node defines a fixed link connection,
> +	with the following structure (example):
> +
> +	&enetc_port2 {
> +		fixed-link {
> +			speed = <1000>;
> +			full-duplex;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	The "fixed-link" node properties are standard (as defined in
> +	fixed-link.txt).
> +	This connection type also applies to the internal ENETC Ports.
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>
Claudiu Manoil Feb. 25, 2019, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #2
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 1:38 AM
>To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
>Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; David S .
>Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Alexandru Marginean
><alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>devicetree@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] dt-bindings: net: freescale: enetc: Add
>connection bindings for ENETC ethernet nodes
>
>On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> Define connection bindings (external PHY connections and internal
>> links) for the ENETC on-chip ethernet controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> v3 - added this patch to the set
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt          | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..2fbb998
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
>> +* ENETC ethernet nodes - external connection bindings
>> +
>> +The ENETC ethernet controllers are PCIe integrated endpoints (IEPs),
>> +on-chip devices discoverable as standard PCIe endpoints, integrated
>> +into Freescale SoCs.  The ENETC devices are self contained, the
>> +information needed for device initialization is available in hardware
>> +(PCIe ECAM area).  However, depending on board design, their external
>> +connections are configurable.
>> +As usual for SoCs, device tree nodes may be used to define these
>> +external connections.  The rest of the document specifies how
>> +external connections for ENETC ethernet controllers may be defined
>> +via device tree nodes.
>> +
>> +Silicon (SoC) availability (<SoC name>: <SoC DT path/name>)
>> +	- LS1028A: [arch/arm64]	[...]freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
>
>This doesn't belong in bindings.
>
>> +
>> +
>> +* ENETC nodes
>> +
>> +Defined in the SoC device tree as "pci" child nodes of the
>> +"pci-host-ecam-generic" compatible "pcie" parent node also known as
>> +the Integrated Endpoint Root Complex (IERC) SoC node.
>
>The host controller attachment is also outside the scope of this binding.
>
>> +
>> +Structure - example (LS1028A):
>> +
>> +	pcie@1f0000000 {
>> +		compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
>> +		device_type = "pci";
>> +		...
>> +		enetc_port0: pci@0,0 {
>
>The node name 'pci' is reserved for bridges. This should match the device class if
>possible (ethernet).
>
>> +			reg = <0x000000 0 0 0 0>;
>> +		};
>> +		enetc_port1: pci@0,1 {
>> +			reg = <0x000100 0 0 0 0>;
>> +		};
>> +		...
>> +	}
>> +
>> +Each ENETC node has a device number and a function number (expressed
>> +by its "reg" property and pci node name, i.e. "pci@0,1" represents
>> +device number 0 and functions number 1).  Only the standard pci "reg"
>> +property is needed here.
>
>There should be a compatible too.
[...]

Ok to simplifying the text and document strictly the enetc device nodes as
"ethernet" nodes, like "ethernet@<dev_no>,<fcn_no>" (i.e ethernet@0,1).
But what would be the compatible string needed for?
The ethernet device driver doesn't need it, probing is done by the pci system.
Is it ok to use a generic name for the compatible string, like, "fsl,enetc", just
to indicate that the relevant driver is located at ethernet/freescale/enetc/
dir in the source code? (under drivers/net, of course)

Thanks.
Claudiu
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2fbb998
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl-enetc.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ 
+* ENETC ethernet nodes - external connection bindings
+
+The ENETC ethernet controllers are PCIe integrated endpoints
+(IEPs), on-chip devices discoverable as standard PCIe endpoints,
+integrated into Freescale SoCs.  The ENETC devices are self
+contained, the information needed for device initialization
+is available in hardware (PCIe ECAM area).  However, depending
+on board design, their external connections are configurable.
+As usual for SoCs, device tree nodes may be used to define these
+external connections.  The rest of the document specifies how
+external connections for ENETC ethernet controllers may be
+defined via device tree nodes.
+
+Silicon (SoC) availability (<SoC name>: <SoC DT path/name>)
+	- LS1028A: [arch/arm64]	[...]freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
+
+
+* ENETC nodes
+
+Defined in the SoC device tree as "pci" child nodes of the
+"pci-host-ecam-generic" compatible "pcie" parent node also known
+as the Integrated Endpoint Root Complex (IERC) SoC node.
+
+Structure - example (LS1028A):
+
+	pcie@1f0000000 {
+		compatible = "pci-host-ecam-generic";
+		device_type = "pci";
+		...
+		enetc_port0: pci@0,0 {
+			reg = <0x000000 0 0 0 0>;
+		};
+		enetc_port1: pci@0,1 {
+			reg = <0x000100 0 0 0 0>;
+		};
+		...
+	}
+
+Each ENETC node has a device number and a function number (expressed
+by its "reg" property and pci node name, i.e. "pci@0,1" represents
+device number 0 and functions number 1).  Only the standard pci "reg"
+property is needed here.
+For easy reference, each ENETC node is tagged by a handle having the
+following format:
+
+	"enetc_port<idx>"   where, idx = 0 .. n-1;
+			    n - #of available ENETC nodes (Ports) on
+				the given SoC.
+
+NOTES
+i. The SoC H/W Reference Manual provides a mapping of the ENETC Port
+numbers to the PCIe Device Number/ Function Number.
+Example (LS1028):
+	All ENETC PFs (PCIe Physical Functions) have Device Number 0.
+	Port 0 - PF0 (pci@0,0)
+	Port 1 - PF1 (pci@0,1)
+	Port 2 - PF2 (pci@0,2)
+	Port 3 - PF6 (pci@0,6)
+
+ii. The SoC H/W Reference Manual also defines which ENETC Ports may have
+external connections (external ports) and which ones are internally
+connected to a on-chip L2 switch for instance (internal ports).
+
+
+* Defining connections for ENETC nodes
+
+To define external connections for the external ENETC Ports on a given
+board/platform, the board device tree should include the SoC device tree
+and reference the external ports by their "enetc_port<idx>" handle.
+
+Following cases arise, defining all possible connection bindings:
+
+1) The ENETC Port is connected to a MDIO configurable PHY:
+
+	In this case, the ENETC node should include a "mdio" sub-node
+	that in turn should contain the "phy" node describing the
+	external phy.  ENETC Port node structure (example):
+
+	&enetc_port0 {
+		phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>;
+		phy-connection-type = "sgmii";
+
+		mdio {
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+			sgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@2 {
+				reg = <0x2>;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+	All properties are mandatory for this case, their bindings already
+	defined (see ethernet.txt and phy.txt).
+
+2) The ENETC Port has a fixed-link connection:
+
+	In this case, the ENETC Port node defines a fixed link connection,
+	with the following structure (example):
+
+	&enetc_port2 {
+		fixed-link {
+			speed = <1000>;
+			full-duplex;
+		};
+	};
+
+	The "fixed-link" node properties are standard (as defined in
+	fixed-link.txt).
+	This connection type also applies to the internal ENETC Ports.