Message ID | 20190326204331.54352-3-bvanassche@acm.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Avoid that .queuecommand() gets called for a quiesced SCSI device | expand |
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:43:31PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > The previous patch guarantees that srp_queuecommand() does not get > invoked while reconnecting occurs. Hence remove the code from > srp_queuecommand() that prevents command queueing while reconnecting. > This patch avoids that the following can appear in the kernel log: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 5600, name: scsi_eh_9 > 1 lock held by scsi_eh_9/5600: > #0: (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: [<00000000cbb798c7>] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xf1/0x1e0 > Preemption disabled at: > [<00000000139badf2>] __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x78/0xf0 > CPU: 9 PID: 5600 Comm: scsi_eh_9 Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc4-dbg+ #1 > Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R720/0VWT90, BIOS 2.5.4 01/22/2016 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x67/0x99 > ___might_sleep+0x16a/0x250 [ib_srp] > __mutex_lock+0x46/0x9d0 > srp_queuecommand+0x356/0x420 [ib_srp] > scsi_dispatch_cmd+0xf6/0x3f0 > scsi_queue_rq+0x4a8/0x5f0 > blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x73/0x440 > blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x109/0x1a0 > __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x131/0x1e0 > __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x9a/0xf0 > blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xc0/0x1e0 > blk_mq_start_hw_queues+0x2c/0x40 > scsi_run_queue+0x18e/0x2d0 > scsi_run_host_queues+0x22/0x40 > scsi_error_handler+0x18d/0x5f0 > kthread+0x11c/0x140 > ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 > > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> > Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> > Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 21 ++------------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) I'm fine with this to go through the scsi tree Jason
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c index be9ddcad8f28..b7c5a35f7daa 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c @@ -2338,7 +2338,6 @@ static void srp_handle_qp_err(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc, static int srp_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd) { struct srp_target_port *target = host_to_target(shost); - struct srp_rport *rport = target->rport; struct srp_rdma_ch *ch; struct srp_request *req; struct srp_iu *iu; @@ -2348,16 +2347,6 @@ static int srp_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd) u32 tag; u16 idx; int len, ret; - const bool in_scsi_eh = !in_interrupt() && current == shost->ehandler; - - /* - * The SCSI EH thread is the only context from which srp_queuecommand() - * can get invoked for blocked devices (SDEV_BLOCK / - * SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK). Avoid racing with srp_reconnect_rport() by - * locking the rport mutex if invoked from inside the SCSI EH. - */ - if (in_scsi_eh) - mutex_lock(&rport->mutex); scmnd->result = srp_chkready(target->rport); if (unlikely(scmnd->result)) @@ -2426,13 +2415,7 @@ static int srp_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd) goto err_unmap; } - ret = 0; - -unlock_rport: - if (in_scsi_eh) - mutex_unlock(&rport->mutex); - - return ret; + return 0; err_unmap: srp_unmap_data(scmnd, ch, req); @@ -2454,7 +2437,7 @@ static int srp_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd) ret = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY; } - goto unlock_rport; + return ret; } /*