Message ID | 155594793429.115924.9115512760848857551.stgit@magnolia (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | xfsprogs-5.0: fix various problems | expand |
On 4/22/19 10:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > Refactor the buffer item release code into a helper, which we will use > in subsequent patches to make the buffer log item lifetime match the > kernel equivalents. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > --- > libxfs/trans.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/libxfs/trans.c b/libxfs/trans.c > index 9de77c8b..629501f8 100644 > --- a/libxfs/trans.c > +++ b/libxfs/trans.c > @@ -505,6 +505,16 @@ libxfs_trans_ordered_buf( > return ret; > } > > +static void > +xfs_buf_item_put( > + struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip) > +{ > + struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf; > + > + bp->b_log_item = NULL; > + kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); > +} > + > void > libxfs_trans_brelse( > xfs_trans_t *tp, > @@ -846,7 +856,6 @@ buf_item_done( > > bp = bip->bli_buf; > ASSERT(bp != NULL); > - bp->b_log_item = NULL; /* remove log item */ > bp->b_transp = NULL; /* remove xact ptr */ > > hold = (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_HOLD); > @@ -861,8 +870,7 @@ buf_item_done( > bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_HOLD; > else > libxfs_putbuf(bp); > - /* release the buf item */ > - kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); > + xfs_buf_item_put(bip); In xfs_buf_item_put(), we reach back up from bip to bip->bli_buf, which is the bp. This is after we did a libxfs_putbuf(bp) on that bp. Is there not a chance of use after free here? Enough puts and a shaker can run, right? > } > > static void >
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 04:26:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 4/22/19 10:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > > > Refactor the buffer item release code into a helper, which we will use > > in subsequent patches to make the buffer log item lifetime match the > > kernel equivalents. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > --- > > libxfs/trans.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/libxfs/trans.c b/libxfs/trans.c > > index 9de77c8b..629501f8 100644 > > --- a/libxfs/trans.c > > +++ b/libxfs/trans.c > > @@ -505,6 +505,16 @@ libxfs_trans_ordered_buf( > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static void > > +xfs_buf_item_put( > > + struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip) > > +{ > > + struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf; > > + > > + bp->b_log_item = NULL; > > + kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); > > +} > > + > > void > > libxfs_trans_brelse( > > xfs_trans_t *tp, > > @@ -846,7 +856,6 @@ buf_item_done( > > > > bp = bip->bli_buf; > > ASSERT(bp != NULL); > > - bp->b_log_item = NULL; /* remove log item */ > > bp->b_transp = NULL; /* remove xact ptr */ > > > > hold = (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_HOLD); > > @@ -861,8 +870,7 @@ buf_item_done( > > bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_HOLD; > > else > > libxfs_putbuf(bp); > > - /* release the buf item */ > > - kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); > > + xfs_buf_item_put(bip); > > In xfs_buf_item_put(), we reach back up from bip to bip->bli_buf, which is > the bp. This is after we did a libxfs_putbuf(bp) on that bp. Is there not > a chance of use after free here? Enough puts and a shaker can run, right? I think you're right, the xfs_buf_item_put should come before the libxfs_putbuf. --D > > } > > > > static void > >
On 4/22/19 4:35 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 04:26:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 4/22/19 10:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >>> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> >>> >>> Refactor the buffer item release code into a helper, which we will use >>> in subsequent patches to make the buffer log item lifetime match the >>> kernel equivalents. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> >>> --- >>> libxfs/trans.c | 14 +++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> >>> diff --git a/libxfs/trans.c b/libxfs/trans.c >>> index 9de77c8b..629501f8 100644 >>> --- a/libxfs/trans.c >>> +++ b/libxfs/trans.c >>> @@ -505,6 +505,16 @@ libxfs_trans_ordered_buf( >>> return ret; >>> } >>> >>> +static void >>> +xfs_buf_item_put( >>> + struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip) >>> +{ >>> + struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf; >>> + >>> + bp->b_log_item = NULL; >>> + kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); >>> +} >>> + >>> void >>> libxfs_trans_brelse( >>> xfs_trans_t *tp, >>> @@ -846,7 +856,6 @@ buf_item_done( >>> >>> bp = bip->bli_buf; >>> ASSERT(bp != NULL); >>> - bp->b_log_item = NULL; /* remove log item */ >>> bp->b_transp = NULL; /* remove xact ptr */ >>> >>> hold = (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_HOLD); >>> @@ -861,8 +870,7 @@ buf_item_done( >>> bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_HOLD; >>> else >>> libxfs_putbuf(bp); >>> - /* release the buf item */ >>> - kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); >>> + xfs_buf_item_put(bip); >> >> In xfs_buf_item_put(), we reach back up from bip to bip->bli_buf, which is >> the bp. This is after we did a libxfs_putbuf(bp) on that bp. Is there not >> a chance of use after free here? Enough puts and a shaker can run, right? > > I think you're right, the xfs_buf_item_put should come before the > libxfs_putbuf. Yeah in the kernel, it comes before xfs_buf_relse, and in userspace, #define xfs_buf_relse(bp) libxfs_putbuf(bp) -Eric
diff --git a/libxfs/trans.c b/libxfs/trans.c index 9de77c8b..629501f8 100644 --- a/libxfs/trans.c +++ b/libxfs/trans.c @@ -505,6 +505,16 @@ libxfs_trans_ordered_buf( return ret; } +static void +xfs_buf_item_put( + struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip) +{ + struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf; + + bp->b_log_item = NULL; + kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); +} + void libxfs_trans_brelse( xfs_trans_t *tp, @@ -846,7 +856,6 @@ buf_item_done( bp = bip->bli_buf; ASSERT(bp != NULL); - bp->b_log_item = NULL; /* remove log item */ bp->b_transp = NULL; /* remove xact ptr */ hold = (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_HOLD); @@ -861,8 +870,7 @@ buf_item_done( bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_HOLD; else libxfs_putbuf(bp); - /* release the buf item */ - kmem_zone_free(xfs_buf_item_zone, bip); + xfs_buf_item_put(bip); } static void