| Message ID | 20190501173443.GA19969@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/4] mm: fix an overly long line in read_cache_page | expand |
1) You need to pass "filp" rather than "filp->private_data" to read_cache_pages()
in v9fs_fid_readpage().
The patched code passes "filp->private_data" as the "data" parameter to
read_cache_pages(), which would generate a call to:
filler(data, page)
which would become a call to:
static int v9fs_vfs_readpage(struct file *filp, struct page *page)
{
return v9fs_fid_readpage(filp->private_data, page);
}
which would then effectively become:
v9fs_fid_readpage(filp->private_data->private_data, page)
Which isn't correct; because data is a void *, no error is thrown when
v9fs_vfs_readpages treats filp->private_data as if it is filp.
2) I'd also like to see an explicit comment in do_read_cache_page() along
the lines of:
/*
* If a custom page filler was passed in use it, otherwise use the
* standard readpage() routine defined for the address_space.
*
*/
3) Patch 5/4?
Otherwise it looks good.
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
> On May 1, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> Fix the callback 9p passes to read_cache_page to actually have the
> proper type expected. Casting around function pointers can easily
> hide typing bugs, and defeats control flow protection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/9p/vfs_addr.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> index 0bcbcc20f769..02e0fc51401e 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@
> * @page: structure to page
> *
> */
> -static int v9fs_fid_readpage(struct p9_fid *fid, struct page *page)
> +static int v9fs_fid_readpage(void *data, struct page *page)
> {
> + struct p9_fid *fid = data;
> struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> struct bio_vec bvec = {.bv_page = page, .bv_len = PAGE_SIZE};
> struct iov_iter to;
> @@ -122,7 +123,8 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_readpages(struct file *filp, struct address_space *mapping,
> if (ret == 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, (void *)v9fs_vfs_readpage, filp);
> + ret = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, v9fs_fid_readpage,
> + filp->private_data);
> p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS, " = %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 12:08:29AM -0600, William Kucharski wrote:
> 3) Patch 5/4?
That's a relatively common notation when an extra patch is needed to fix
something after a series has been sent ;-)
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 12:08:29AM -0600, William Kucharski wrote: > 1) You need to pass "filp" rather than "filp->private_data" to read_cache_pages() > in v9fs_fid_readpage(). With this patch v9fs_fid_readpage takes a void pointer that must be a FID, and we pass the FID everywhere: - v9fs_vfs_readpage passes filp->private_data - v9fs_vfs_readpages passes filp->private_data through read_cache_pages - v9fs_write_begin passes the local fid variable > > The patched code passes "filp->private_data" as the "data" parameter to > read_cache_pages(), which would generate a call to: > > filler(data, page) > > which would become a call to: > > static int v9fs_vfs_readpage(struct file *filp, struct page *page) > { > return v9fs_fid_readpage(filp->private_data, page); > } Except that we don't pass v9fs_vfs_readpage as the filler any more, we now pass v9fs_fid_readpage.
> On May 2, 2019, at 7:04 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > Except that we don't pass v9fs_vfs_readpage as the filler any more, > we now pass v9fs_fid_readpage. True, so never mind. :-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c index 0bcbcc20f769..02e0fc51401e 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ * @page: structure to page * */ -static int v9fs_fid_readpage(struct p9_fid *fid, struct page *page) +static int v9fs_fid_readpage(void *data, struct page *page) { + struct p9_fid *fid = data; struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host; struct bio_vec bvec = {.bv_page = page, .bv_len = PAGE_SIZE}; struct iov_iter to; @@ -122,7 +123,8 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_readpages(struct file *filp, struct address_space *mapping, if (ret == 0) return ret; - ret = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, (void *)v9fs_vfs_readpage, filp); + ret = read_cache_pages(mapping, pages, v9fs_fid_readpage, + filp->private_data); p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS, " = %d\n", ret); return ret; }
Fix the callback 9p passes to read_cache_page to actually have the proper type expected. Casting around function pointers can easily hide typing bugs, and defeats control flow protection. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- fs/9p/vfs_addr.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)