mbox series

[4.4.y,00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s

Message ID 1557761837-24993-1-git-send-email-fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Add basic support for the iwg23s | expand

Message

Fabrizio Castro May 13, 2019, 3:36 p.m. UTC 
Dear All,

This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).

Thanks,
Fab

Biju Das (30):
  ARM: shmobile: r8a77470: basic SoC support
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add EtherAVB pin groups
  soc: renesas: rcar-rst: Add support for RZ/G1C
  ARM: debug-ll: Add support for r8a77470
  gpiolib: Avoid calling chip->request() for unused gpios
  gpio: rcar: Add GPIO hole support
  dt-bindings: gpio: rcar: Add gpio-reserved-ranges support
  ARM: shmobile: defconfig: Enable r8a77470 SoC
  ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable r8a77470 SoC
  serial: sh-sci: Document r8a77470 bindings
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Initial SoC device tree
  dt-bindings: arm: Document iW-RainboW-G23S single board computer
  ARM: dts: iwg23s-sbc: Add support for iWave G23S-SBC based on RZ/G1C
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: sh-pfc: Document r8a77470 PFC support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add PFC support
  dt-bindings: gpio: rcar: Add r8a77470 (RZ/G1C) support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add GPIO support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add SCIF support
  dt-bindings: irqchip: renesas-irqc: Document r8a77470 support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add IRQC support
  ARM: dts: iwg23s-sbc: Add pinctl support for scif1
  dt-bindings: rcar-dmac: Document r8a77470 support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add SYS-DMAC support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add SCIF DMA support
  dt-bindings: net: renesas-ravb: Add support for r8a77470 SoC
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add EtherAVB support
  ARM: dts: iwg23s-sbc: Add EtherAVB support
  ARM: dts: iwg23s-sbc: specify EtherAVB PHY IRQ
  ARM: dts: iwg23s-sbc: Add pinctl support for EtherAVB

Fabrizio Castro (16):
  clk: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Add quirks for the RZ/G1C
  clk: shmobile: Compile clk-rcar-gen2.c when using the r8a77470
  ARM: shmobile: r8a77470: Add clock index macros for DT sources
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add I2C4 pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add DU0 pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add QSPI0 pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add SDHI2 pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add USB pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add remaining I2C pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add DU1 pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add VIN pin groups
  pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77470: Add QSPI1 pin groups
  clk: shmobile: Document r8a77470 CPG clock support
  clk: shmobile: Document r8a77470 CPG DIV6 clock support
  clk: shmobile: Document r8a77470 MSTP clock support
  ARM: dts: r8a77470: Add clocks

Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
  gpio: rcar: Implement gpiochip.set_multiple()
  dt-bindings: sram: Document renesas,smp-sram
  dt-bindings: rcar-dmac: Document missing error interrupt

Stephen Boyd (3):
  gpiolib: Extract mask allocation into subroutine
  gpiolib: Support 'gpio-reserved-ranges' property
  dt-bindings: gpio: Add a gpio-reserved-ranges property

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt |    4 +
 .../bindings/clock/renesas,cpg-div6-clocks.txt     |    1 +
 .../bindings/clock/renesas,cpg-mstp-clocks.txt     |    1 +
 .../clock/renesas,rcar-gen2-cpg-clocks.txt         |    1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,rcar-dmac.txt  |    6 +-
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt    |    7 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt |   44 +-
 .../bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,irqc.txt |    1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ravb.txt       |    1 +
 .../bindings/pinctrl/renesas,pfc-pinctrl.txt       |    1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/reset/renesas,rst.txt      |    1 +
 .../bindings/serial/renesas,sci-serial.txt         |    2 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/sram/renesas,smp-sram.txt  |   27 +
 arch/arm/Kconfig.debug                             |   13 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |    1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a77470-iwg23s-sbc.dts          |   68 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a77470.dtsi                    |  764 +++++
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig                |    1 +
 arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig                |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig                     |    4 +
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rcar-gen2.c              |    2 +
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-rcar-gen2.c           |    2 +
 drivers/clk/shmobile/Makefile                      |    1 +
 drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-rcar-gen2.c               |   39 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           |   23 +
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c                          |   24 +
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c                             |   64 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Kconfig                     |    5 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/Makefile                    |    1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c                      |    6 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h                      |    1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77470.c              | 3292 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/renesas/rcar-rst.c                     |    1 +
 include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a77470-clock.h         |  140 +
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h                        |   18 +
 35 files changed, 4541 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/renesas,smp-sram.txt
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a77470-iwg23s-sbc.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a77470.dtsi
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77470.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/r8a77470-clock.h

Comments

Pavel Machek May 13, 2019, 6:52 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi!

> This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).

Ok, let me take a look...
								Pavel
Pavel Machek May 13, 2019, 8:17 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi!

> This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).

Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response to
patches.

Best regards,
								Pavel
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu May 14, 2019, 12:28 a.m. UTC | #3 
Hi,

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> > on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> 
> Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response to
> patches.

There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the CIP kernel maintenance rules.
If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro
Fabrizio Castro May 14, 2019, 10:12 a.m. UTC | #4 
Thank you guys for your help!

I think for the future we would need to agree on a format we are all comfortable with
when backporting a patch from mainline is not an option.

Do you have any suggestions?

Thanks,
Fab

> From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> Sent: 14 May 2019 01:28
> Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> > > on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> >
> > Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response to
> > patches.
> 
> There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the CIP kernel maintenance rules.
> If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.
> 
> Best regards,
>   Nobuhiro
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu May 14, 2019, 1:28 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hi,

2019年5月14日(火) 19:12 Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>:
>
> Thank you guys for your help!
>
> I think for the future we would need to agree on a format we are all comfortable with
> when backporting a patch from mainline is not an option.
>
> Do you have any suggestions?

I think it is enough to write down a note why each commit is not
backported from the linux kernel.
CIP has an "upstream first" policy, so if we can not choice this
policy, it is better to include a
reason to commit message, I think.
For example, 'We can not backport a patch because the clock framework
is different in 4.4, so we
need to create a new patch.'

How is this?

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro


>
> Thanks,
> Fab
>
> > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> > Sent: 14 May 2019 01:28
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> > > > on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> > >
> > > Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response to
> > > patches.
> >
> > There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the CIP kernel maintenance rules.
> > If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >   Nobuhiro
> _______________________________________________
> cip-dev mailing list
> cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
> https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev



--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
Fabrizio Castro May 15, 2019, 12:56 p.m. UTC | #6 
Hello Nobuhiro-san,

Thank you for your feedback!

> From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> Sent: 14 May 2019 14:28
> Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 2019年5月14日(火) 19:12 Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>:
> >
> > Thank you guys for your help!
> >
> > I think for the future we would need to agree on a format we are all comfortable with
> > when backporting a patch from mainline is not an option.
> >
> > Do you have any suggestions?
> 
> I think it is enough to write down a note why each commit is not
> backported from the linux kernel.
> CIP has an "upstream first" policy, so if we can not choice this
> policy, it is better to include a
> reason to commit message, I think.
> For example, 'We can not backport a patch because the clock framework
> is different in 4.4, so we
> need to create a new patch.'
> 
> How is this?

It sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Fab

> 
> Best regards,
>   Nobuhiro
> 
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fab
> >
> > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> > > Sent: 14 May 2019 01:28
> > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave, based
> > > > > on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response to
> > > > patches.
> > >
> > > There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the CIP kernel maintenance rules.
> > > If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >   Nobuhiro
> > _______________________________________________
> > cip-dev mailing list
> > cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
> > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>    iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
>    GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu May 16, 2019, 12:20 a.m. UTC | #7 
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabrizio Castro [mailto:fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:57 PM
> To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> Cc: iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○ＳＷＣ□ＯＳＴ)
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>;
> cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>
> Subject: RE: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the
> iwg23s
> 
> Hello Nobuhiro-san,
> 
> Thank you for your feedback!
> 
> > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> > Sent: 14 May 2019 14:28
> > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the
> > iwg23s
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2019年5月14日(火) 19:12 Fabrizio Castro
> <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>:
> > >
> > > Thank you guys for your help!
> > >
> > > I think for the future we would need to agree on a format we are all
> > > comfortable with when backporting a patch from mainline is not an
> option.
> > >
> > > Do you have any suggestions?
> >
> > I think it is enough to write down a note why each commit is not
> > backported from the linux kernel.
> > CIP has an "upstream first" policy, so if we can not choice this
> > policy, it is better to include a reason to commit message, I think.
> > For example, 'We can not backport a patch because the clock framework
> > is different in 4.4, so we need to create a new patch.'
> >
> > How is this?
> 
> It sounds good to me.

Thanks.
Could you add a comment to the targeted patch and resend it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Fab

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

> 
> >
> > Best regards,
> >   Nobuhiro
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Fab
> > >
> > > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> > > > Sent: 14 May 2019 01:28
> > > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for
> > > > the iwg23s
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave,
> > > > > > based on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response
> > > > > to patches.
> > > >
> > > > There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the
> CIP kernel maintenance rules.
> > > > If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >   Nobuhiro
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
> > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> >    iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
> >    GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
Fabrizio Castro May 16, 2019, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #8 
Hello Iwamatsu-san,

> From: nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> Sent: 16 May 2019 01:20
> Subject: RE: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the iwg23s
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fabrizio Castro [mailto:fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:57 PM
> > To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> > Cc: iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○ＳＷＣ□ＯＳＴ)
> > <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>; Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>;
> > cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org; Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>
> > Subject: RE: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the
> > iwg23s
> >
> > Hello Nobuhiro-san,
> >
> > Thank you for your feedback!
> >
> > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>
> > > Sent: 14 May 2019 14:28
> > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for the
> > > iwg23s
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2019年5月14日(火) 19:12 Fabrizio Castro
> > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you guys for your help!
> > > >
> > > > I think for the future we would need to agree on a format we are all
> > > > comfortable with when backporting a patch from mainline is not an
> > option.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any suggestions?
> > >
> > > I think it is enough to write down a note why each commit is not
> > > backported from the linux kernel.
> > > CIP has an "upstream first" policy, so if we can not choice this
> > > policy, it is better to include a reason to commit message, I think.
> > > For example, 'We can not backport a patch because the clock framework
> > > is different in 4.4, so we need to create a new patch.'
> > >
> > > How is this?
> >
> > It sounds good to me.
> 
> Thanks.
> Could you add a comment to the targeted patch and resend it?

Will resend the whole thing for simplicity.

Thanks,
Fab

> >
> > Thanks,
> > Fab
> 
> Best regards,
>   Nobuhiro
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >   Nobuhiro
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Fab
> > > >
> > > > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> > > > > Sent: 14 May 2019 01:28
> > > > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.4.y 00/52] Add basic support for
> > > > > the iwg23s
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This series adds basic support for the iwg23s from iWave,
> > > > > > > based on the RZ/G1C (a.k.a. r8a77470).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks, applied. Minor comments were sent in replies to response
> > > > > > to patches.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are patches in this patch series that is not match to the
> > CIP kernel maintenance rules.
> > > > > If we include these, I think that the commit message is not enough.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >   Nobuhiro
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cip-dev mailing list
> > > > cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org
> > > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> > >    iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
> > >    GPG ID: 40AD1FA6