Message ID | 20190516161403.79053-1-farman@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | s390: vfio-ccw fixes | expand |
On 05/16/2019 12:14 PM, Eric Farman wrote: > Here are the remaining patches in my fixes series, to handle the more > involved scenario of channel programs that do not move any actual data > to/from the device. They were reordered per feedback from v2, which > means they received minor massaging because of overlapping code and > some cleanup to the commit messages. > > They are based on Conny's vfio-ccw tree. :) > > Changelog: > v2 -> v3: > - Patches 1-4: > - [Farhan] Added r-b > - [Cornelia] Queued to vfio-ccw, dropped from this version > - Patches 5/6: > - [Cornelia/Farhan] Swapped the order of these patches, minor > rework on the placement of bytes/idaw_nr variables and the > commit messages that resulted. > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10944075/ > v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10928799/ > > Eric Farman (3): > s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers > s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw > s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes > > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> for the series. Thanks Farhan
On Wed, 22 May 2019 08:20:43 -0400 Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On 05/16/2019 12:14 PM, Eric Farman wrote: > > Here are the remaining patches in my fixes series, to handle the more > > involved scenario of channel programs that do not move any actual data > > to/from the device. They were reordered per feedback from v2, which > > means they received minor massaging because of overlapping code and > > some cleanup to the commit messages. > > > > They are based on Conny's vfio-ccw tree. :) > > > > Changelog: > > v2 -> v3: > > - Patches 1-4: > > - [Farhan] Added r-b > > - [Cornelia] Queued to vfio-ccw, dropped from this version > > - Patches 5/6: > > - [Cornelia/Farhan] Swapped the order of these patches, minor > > rework on the placement of bytes/idaw_nr variables and the > > commit messages that resulted. > > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10944075/ > > v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10928799/ > > > > Eric Farman (3): > > s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers > > s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw > > s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes > > > > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > > Acked-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> for the series. Thank you!
On Thu, 16 May 2019 18:14:00 +0200 Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Here are the remaining patches in my fixes series, to handle the more > involved scenario of channel programs that do not move any actual data > to/from the device. They were reordered per feedback from v2, which > means they received minor massaging because of overlapping code and > some cleanup to the commit messages. > > They are based on Conny's vfio-ccw tree. :) > > Changelog: > v2 -> v3: > - Patches 1-4: > - [Farhan] Added r-b > - [Cornelia] Queued to vfio-ccw, dropped from this version > - Patches 5/6: > - [Cornelia/Farhan] Swapped the order of these patches, minor > rework on the placement of bytes/idaw_nr variables and the > commit messages that resulted. > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10944075/ > v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10928799/ > > Eric Farman (3): > s390/cio: Don't pin vfio pages for empty transfers > s390/cio: Allow zero-length CCWs in vfio-ccw > s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes > > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > Thanks, applied.