Message ID | 20190515093420.GC3409@mwanda (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Eduardo Valentin |
Headers | show |
Series | thermal: mmio: remove some dead code | expand |
On 5/15/2019 12:34 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The platform_get_resource() function doesn't return error pointers, it > returns NULL. The way this is normally done, is that we pass the NULL > resource to devm_ioremap_resource() and then check for errors from that. > See the comment in front of devm_ioremap_resource() for more details. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: Talel Shenhar <talel@amazon.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > index de3cceea23bc..40524fa13533 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > @@ -53,13 +53,6 @@ static int thermal_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > > resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > - if (IS_ERR(resource)) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, > - "fail to get platform memory resource (%ld)\n", > - PTR_ERR(resource)); > - return PTR_ERR(resource); > - } > - > sensor->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, resource); > if (IS_ERR(sensor->mmio_base)) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap memory (%ld)\n",
hey Dan, Talel, On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:26:51PM +0300, Shenhar, Talel wrote: > > On 5/15/2019 12:34 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >The platform_get_resource() function doesn't return error pointers, it > >returns NULL. The way this is normally done, is that we pass the NULL > >resource to devm_ioremap_resource() and then check for errors from that. > >See the comment in front of devm_ioremap_resource() for more details. > > > >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > Acked-by: Talel Shenhar <talel@amazon.com> Cool. I will be collecting this. The only change I will do while applying this is that the subject will look like this: "thermal: thermal_mmio: remove some dead code" Just to match the file / driver name. > >--- > > drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c | 7 ------- > > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > >index de3cceea23bc..40524fa13533 100644 > >--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > >+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c > >@@ -53,13 +53,6 @@ static int thermal_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return -ENOMEM; > > resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > >- if (IS_ERR(resource)) { > >- dev_err(&pdev->dev, > >- "fail to get platform memory resource (%ld)\n", > >- PTR_ERR(resource)); > >- return PTR_ERR(resource); > >- } > >- > > sensor->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, resource); > > if (IS_ERR(sensor->mmio_base)) { > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap memory (%ld)\n",
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 07:09:03PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > hey Dan, Talel, > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:26:51PM +0300, Shenhar, Talel wrote: > > > > On 5/15/2019 12:34 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > >The platform_get_resource() function doesn't return error pointers, it > > >returns NULL. The way this is normally done, is that we pass the NULL > > >resource to devm_ioremap_resource() and then check for errors from that. > > >See the comment in front of devm_ioremap_resource() for more details. > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > Acked-by: Talel Shenhar <talel@amazon.com> > > Cool. I will be collecting this. The only change I will do while > applying this is that the subject will look like this: > "thermal: thermal_mmio: remove some dead code" > > Just to match the file / driver name. > I feel like it's duplicative to have "thermal" twice, but whatever. What I normally do is I copy-and-paste what other people use because the prefered format varies from subsystem to subsystem. Here the only previous patch was: 71aa3693493d thermal: Introduce Amazon's Annapurna Labs Thermal Driver This format was obviously even worse... I'm often the first person to send a patch for new drivers. It used to be common for people to not use a correct patch prefix for the patch which adds a driver. But what happened was people got annoyed with the prefixes I chose. And I was like, "Nah. Forget about it. I got here first and I claim this land for my ownself. Be grateful I didn't choose a snide or rude patch prefix because that's my authority as a prefix chooser." regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c index de3cceea23bc..40524fa13533 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c @@ -53,13 +53,6 @@ static int thermal_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENOMEM; resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - if (IS_ERR(resource)) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "fail to get platform memory resource (%ld)\n", - PTR_ERR(resource)); - return PTR_ERR(resource); - } - sensor->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, resource); if (IS_ERR(sensor->mmio_base)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to ioremap memory (%ld)\n",
The platform_get_resource() function doesn't return error pointers, it returns NULL. The way this is normally done, is that we pass the NULL resource to devm_ioremap_resource() and then check for errors from that. See the comment in front of devm_ioremap_resource() for more details. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- drivers/thermal/thermal_mmio.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)