| Message ID | 1559754961-26783-6-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add minimal boot support for IPQ6018 | expand |
On 05/06/2019 18:16, Sricharan R wrote: > Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > CP01 evaluation board. > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 35 ++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 267 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > index 21d548f..ac22dbb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8016-sbc.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8096-db820c.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq8074-hk01.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-mtp.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8992-bullhead-rev-101.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8994-angler-rev-101.dtb > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ac7cb22 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * IPQ6018 CP01 board device tree source > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +/dts-v1/; > + > +#include "ipq6018.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + #address-cells = <0x2>; > + #size-cells = <0x2>; > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018/AP-CP01-C1"; > + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-cp01", "qcom,ipq6018"; > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > +}; > + > +&tlmm { > + uart_pins: uart_pins { > + mux { > + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; > + function = "blsp2_uart"; > + drive-strength = <8>; > + bias-pull-down; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > +&blsp1_uart3 { > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart_pins>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + status = "ok"; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..79cccdd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * IPQ6018 SoC device tree source > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h> > + > +/ { > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018"; > + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018"; > + > + chosen { > + bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 rw init=/init"; > + bootargs-append = " swiotlb=1 clk_ignore_unused"; > + }; > + > + reserved-memory { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ranges; > + > + tz:tz@48500000 { > + no-map; > + reg = <0x0 0x48500000 0x0 0x00200000>; > + }; > + }; > + > + soc: soc { > + #address-cells = <0x1>; > + #size-cells = <0x1>; > + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; > + dma-ranges; > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > + > + intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 { > + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <0x3>; > + reg = <0xb000000 0x1000>, <0xb002000 0x1000>; Where are the rest of the GICv2 MMIO regions, such as GICV and GICH? And the maintenance interrupt? > + }; > + > + timer { > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; The fact that you expose the EL2 timer interrupt would tend to confirm the idea that this system supports virtualization... Hence my questions above. Thanks, M.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > CP01 evaluation board. > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > > + clocks { > + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <32000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for the IPQ6018. (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). Cheers, Christian
Hi Marc, On 6/5/2019 10:56 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 05/06/2019 18:16, Sricharan R wrote: >> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >> CP01 evaluation board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 35 ++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 267 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> index 21d548f..ac22dbb 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8016-sbc.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8096-db820c.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq8074-hk01.dtb >> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-mtp.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8992-bullhead-rev-101.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8994-angler-rev-101.dtb >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..ac7cb22 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * IPQ6018 CP01 board device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +/dts-v1/; >> + >> +#include "ipq6018.dtsi" >> + >> +/ { >> + #address-cells = <0x2>; >> + #size-cells = <0x2>; >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018/AP-CP01-C1"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-cp01", "qcom,ipq6018"; >> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; >> +}; >> + >> +&tlmm { >> + uart_pins: uart_pins { >> + mux { >> + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; >> + function = "blsp2_uart"; >> + drive-strength = <8>; >> + bias-pull-down; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> +&blsp1_uart3 { >> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart_pins>; >> + pinctrl-names = "default"; >> + status = "ok"; >> +}; >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..79cccdd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * IPQ6018 SoC device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h> >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018"; >> + >> + chosen { >> + bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 rw init=/init"; >> + bootargs-append = " swiotlb=1 clk_ignore_unused"; >> + }; >> + >> + reserved-memory { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + ranges; >> + >> + tz:tz@48500000 { >> + no-map; >> + reg = <0x0 0x48500000 0x0 0x00200000>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + soc: soc { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; >> + dma-ranges; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + >> + intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x3>; >> + reg = <0xb000000 0x1000>, <0xb002000 0x1000>; > > Where are the rest of the GICv2 MMIO regions, such as GICV and GICH? And > the maintenance interrupt? > GICH - 0xB001000 -- 0xB002000 GICV - 0xB004000 -- 0xB005000 Will add this and the PPI as well. Regards, Sricharan >> + }; >> + >> + timer { >> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; >> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > > The fact that you expose the EL2 timer interrupt would tend to confirm > the idea that this system supports virtualization... Hence my questions > above. > > Thanks, > > M. >
On Wed 05 Jun 10:16 PDT 2019, Sricharan R wrote: > Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > CP01 evaluation board. > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> Please fix the order of these (or add a Co-developed-by). > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 35 ++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 267 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > index 21d548f..ac22dbb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8016-sbc.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8096-db820c.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq8074-hk01.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb Sort order. > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-mtp.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8992-bullhead-rev-101.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8994-angler-rev-101.dtb > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ac7cb22 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * IPQ6018 CP01 board device tree source > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +/dts-v1/; > + > +#include "ipq6018.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + #address-cells = <0x2>; > + #size-cells = <0x2>; This is a count, write it in base 10.. > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018/AP-CP01-C1"; > + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-cp01", "qcom,ipq6018"; > + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; Changing #address-cells, #size-cells and interrupt-parent will break the dtsi, so I think you should specify them there. > +}; > + > +&tlmm { Please sort your nodes based on address, then node name, then label. > + uart_pins: uart_pins { > + mux { > + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; > + function = "blsp2_uart"; > + drive-strength = <8>; > + bias-pull-down; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > +&blsp1_uart3 { > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart_pins>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + status = "ok"; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..79cccdd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * IPQ6018 SoC device tree source > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h> > + > +/ { > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018"; > + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018"; No need for model and compatible in the dtsi, these should always be specified by the including file. > + > + chosen { > + bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 rw init=/init"; Do you really need console? Can't you use stdout-path? And there's no need to specify init=/init. > + bootargs-append = " swiotlb=1 clk_ignore_unused"; I'm hoping that you will work on removing the need for clk_ignore_unused. > + }; > + > + reserved-memory { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ranges; > + > + tz:tz@48500000 { Space after : > + no-map; > + reg = <0x0 0x48500000 0x0 0x00200000>; I would prefer to have the reg first in these nodes, then the region's properties. > + }; > + }; > + > + soc: soc { > + #address-cells = <0x1>; > + #size-cells = <0x1>; > + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; > + dma-ranges; > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > + > + intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 { As described above, please sort your nodes based on address, node name and lastly label name. > + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <0x3>; > + reg = <0xb000000 0x1000>, <0xb002000 0x1000>; > + }; > + > + timer { > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > + <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > + }; > + > + timer@b120000 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer-mem"; > + reg = <0xb120000 0x1000>; Please pad addresses in reg to 8 digits, to make them faster to compare. > + clock-frequency = <19200000>; > + > + frame@b120000 { > + frame-number = <0>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > + <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb121000 0x1000>, > + <0xb122000 0x1000>; > + }; > + > + frame@b123000 { > + frame-number = <1>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb123000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + frame@b124000 { > + frame-number = <2>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb124000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + frame@b125000 { > + frame-number = <3>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb125000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + frame@b126000 { > + frame-number = <4>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb126000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + frame@b127000 { > + frame-number = <5>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb127000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + frame@b128000 { > + frame-number = <6>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + reg = <0xb128000 0x1000>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + }; > + > + gcc: gcc@1800000 { > + compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq6018"; > + reg = <0x1800000 0x80000>; > + #clock-cells = <0x1>; This is a count, use base 10. > + #reset-cells = <0x1>; > + }; > + > + blsp1_uart3: serial@78b1000 { > + compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.4", "qcom,msm-uartdm"; > + reg = <0x78b1000 0x200>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 306 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_UART3_APPS_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core", "iface"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + tlmm: pinctrl@1000000 { > + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pinctrl"; > + reg = <0x1000000 0x300000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0xd0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; > + gpio-controller; > + #gpio-cells = <0x2>; gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 80>; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <0x2>; > + > + uart_pins: uart_pins { > + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; > + function = "blsp2_uart"; > + drive-strength = <8>; > + bias-pull-down; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > + psci: psci { > + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0"; > + method = "smc"; > + }; > + > + cpus: cpus { > + #address-cells = <0x1>; > + #size-cells = <0x0>; > + > + CPU0: cpu@0 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + reg = <0x0>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; > + }; > + > + CPU1: cpu@1 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + reg = <0x1>; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; > + }; > + > + CPU2: cpu@2 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + reg = <0x2>; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; > + }; > + > + CPU3: cpu@3 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + reg = <0x3>; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; > + }; > + > + L2_0: l2-cache { > + compatible = "cache"; > + cache-level = <0x2>; > + }; > + }; > + > + pmuv8: pmu { > + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | > + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; > + }; > + > + clocks { > + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { Don't use _ in the node names. > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <32000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + xo: xo { > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + bias_pll_cc_clk { Please give this a label and reference it from the node that uses it (regardless of the implementation matching by clock name). > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <300000000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk { > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <416500000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk { This should come from the PHY. > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <125000000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; Regards, Bjorn
Hi Christian, On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >> CP01 evaluation board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> >> + clocks { >> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <32000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + > Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk > on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. > From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK > declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and > datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for > the IPQ6018. > (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). > What exactly is the issue that you faced ? Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. Regards, Sricharan
On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: > >> > >> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > >> CP01 evaluation board. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >> > >> + clocks { > >> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <32000>; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > > Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk > > on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. > > From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK > > declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and > > datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for > > the IPQ6018. > > (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). > > > > What exactly is the issue that you faced ? > Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. We need just a confirmation. Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { | compatible = "fixed-clock"; | clock-frequency = <32768>; | #clock-cells = <0>; | }; <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz sleep clock." So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. Regards, Christian
Hi Bjorn, On 6/8/2019 9:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 05 Jun 10:16 PDT 2019, Sricharan R wrote: > >> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >> CP01 evaluation board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > > Please fix the order of these (or add a Co-developed-by). > ok >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 35 ++++ >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 267 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> index 21d548f..ac22dbb 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8016-sbc.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8096-db820c.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq8074-hk01.dtb >> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb > > Sort order. > ok >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-mtp.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8992-bullhead-rev-101.dtb >> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8994-angler-rev-101.dtb >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..ac7cb22 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * IPQ6018 CP01 board device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +/dts-v1/; >> + >> +#include "ipq6018.dtsi" >> + >> +/ { >> + #address-cells = <0x2>; >> + #size-cells = <0x2>; > > This is a count, write it in base 10.. > ok >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018/AP-CP01-C1"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-cp01", "qcom,ipq6018"; >> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; > > Changing #address-cells, #size-cells and interrupt-parent will break the > dtsi, so I think you should specify them there. > ok, will move it to the dtsi. >> +}; >> + >> +&tlmm { > > Please sort your nodes based on address, then node name, then label. > ok >> + uart_pins: uart_pins { >> + mux { >> + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; >> + function = "blsp2_uart"; >> + drive-strength = <8>; >> + bias-pull-down; >> + }; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> +&blsp1_uart3 { >> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart_pins>; >> + pinctrl-names = "default"; >> + status = "ok"; >> +}; >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..79cccdd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * IPQ6018 SoC device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h> >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018"; >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018"; > > No need for model and compatible in the dtsi, these should always be > specified by the including file. > ok, will move it to the dts. >> + >> + chosen { >> + bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 rw init=/init"; > > Do you really need console? Can't you use stdout-path? > ok, will change. > And there's no need to specify init=/init. > ok. >> + bootargs-append = " swiotlb=1 clk_ignore_unused"; > > I'm hoping that you will work on removing the need for > clk_ignore_unused. > hmm, should not be required even now. will remove that. >> + }; >> + >> + reserved-memory { >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + ranges; >> + >> + tz:tz@48500000 { > > Space after : > ok. >> + no-map; >> + reg = <0x0 0x48500000 0x0 0x00200000>; > > I would prefer to have the reg first in these nodes, then the region's > properties. > ok. >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + soc: soc { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x1>; >> + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; >> + dma-ranges; >> + compatible = "simple-bus"; >> + >> + intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 { > > As described above, please sort your nodes based on address, node name > and lastly label name. > ok. >> + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x3>; >> + reg = <0xb000000 0x1000>, <0xb002000 0x1000>; >> + }; >> + >> + timer { >> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; >> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, >> + <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; >> + }; >> + >> + timer@b120000 { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + ranges; >> + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer-mem"; >> + reg = <0xb120000 0x1000>; > > Please pad addresses in reg to 8 digits, to make them faster to compare. > ok. >> + clock-frequency = <19200000>; >> + >> + frame@b120000 { >> + frame-number = <0>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, >> + <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb121000 0x1000>, >> + <0xb122000 0x1000>; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b123000 { >> + frame-number = <1>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb123000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b124000 { >> + frame-number = <2>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb124000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b125000 { >> + frame-number = <3>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb125000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b126000 { >> + frame-number = <4>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb126000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b127000 { >> + frame-number = <5>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb127000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + frame@b128000 { >> + frame-number = <6>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + reg = <0xb128000 0x1000>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + gcc: gcc@1800000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq6018"; >> + reg = <0x1800000 0x80000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0x1>; > > This is a count, use base 10. > ok. >> + #reset-cells = <0x1>; >> + }; >> + >> + blsp1_uart3: serial@78b1000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.4", "qcom,msm-uartdm"; >> + reg = <0x78b1000 0x200>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 306 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_UART3_APPS_CLK>, >> + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>; >> + clock-names = "core", "iface"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + tlmm: pinctrl@1000000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pinctrl"; >> + reg = <0x1000000 0x300000>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0xd0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; >> + gpio-controller; >> + #gpio-cells = <0x2>; > > gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 80>; > ok. >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <0x2>; >> + >> + uart_pins: uart_pins { >> + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; >> + function = "blsp2_uart"; >> + drive-strength = <8>; >> + bias-pull-down; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + psci: psci { >> + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0"; >> + method = "smc"; >> + }; >> + >> + cpus: cpus { >> + #address-cells = <0x1>; >> + #size-cells = <0x0>; >> + >> + CPU0: cpu@0 { >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; >> + reg = <0x0>; >> + enable-method = "psci"; >> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; >> + }; >> + >> + CPU1: cpu@1 { >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; >> + enable-method = "psci"; >> + reg = <0x1>; >> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; >> + }; >> + >> + CPU2: cpu@2 { >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; >> + enable-method = "psci"; >> + reg = <0x2>; >> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; >> + }; >> + >> + CPU3: cpu@3 { >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; >> + enable-method = "psci"; >> + reg = <0x3>; >> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; >> + }; >> + >> + L2_0: l2-cache { >> + compatible = "cache"; >> + cache-level = <0x2>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + pmuv8: pmu { >> + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; >> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | >> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; >> + }; >> + >> + clocks { >> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > > Don't use _ in the node names. > ok. >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <32000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + xo: xo { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <24000000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + bias_pll_cc_clk { > > Please give this a label and reference it from the node that uses it > (regardless of the implementation matching by clock name). > ok, in that case, so might have to remove these for now, till we add the corresponding users. >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <300000000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk { >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >> + clock-frequency = <416500000>; >> + #clock-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk { > > This should come from the PHY. ok, will remove it here and add it later when adding USB node Regards, Sricharan
Quoting Sricharan R (2019-06-10 08:45:22) > On 6/8/2019 9:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Wed 05 Jun 10:16 PDT 2019, Sricharan R wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..79cccdd > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <32000>; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + xo: xo { > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + bias_pll_cc_clk { > > > > Please give this a label and reference it from the node that uses it > > (regardless of the implementation matching by clock name). > > > ok, in that case, so might have to remove these for now, till we add > the corresponding users. Yes, please remove them. They don't look like board clks, instead they're SoC level details that need to be created by some clk driver like GCC. > > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <300000000>; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk { > >> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >> + clock-frequency = <416500000>; > >> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> +
Hi Christian, On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >>>> CP01 evaluation board. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >>>> >>>> + clocks { >>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk >>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. >>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK >>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and >>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for >>> the IPQ6018. >>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). >>> >> >> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? >> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. > > We need just a confirmation. > > Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. > > | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > | compatible = "fixed-clock"; > | clock-frequency = <32768>; > | #clock-cells = <0>; > | }; > > <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> > > Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the > future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. > > For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external > oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". > Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec > depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. > (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same > in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". > > For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: > <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> > "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz > sleep clock." > > So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. > Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values > listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values > are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. > Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the ipq8074.dtsi as well Regards, Sricharan
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > >> Hi Christian, > >> > >> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > >>>> CP01 evaluation board. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >>>> > >>>> + clocks { > >>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; > >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >>>> + }; > >>>> + > >>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk > >>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. > >>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK > >>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and > >>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for > >>> the IPQ6018. > >>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). > >>> > >> > >> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? > >> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. > > > > We need just a confirmation. > > > > Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. > > > > | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > > | compatible = "fixed-clock"; > > | clock-frequency = <32768>; > > | #clock-cells = <0>; > > | }; > > > > <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> > > > > Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the > > future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. > > > > For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external > > oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". > > Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec > > depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. > > (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same > > in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". > > > > For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: > > <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> > > "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz > > sleep clock." > > > > So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. > > Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values > > listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values > > are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. > > > > Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived > from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. That's really valuable information to have. Thank you! > Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses > out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the > ipq8074.dtsi as well Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019), https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482 it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U) clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 [...] sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" (something like this:) clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 [...] gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be: clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xo 10 10 48000000 0 0 [...] gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 or am I missing/skipping over something important? Regards, Christian
Hi Christian, On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >>>> Hi Christian, >>>> >>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >>>>>> CP01 evaluation board. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >>>>>> >>>>>> + clocks { >>>>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; >>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; >>>>>> + }; >>>>>> + >>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk >>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. >>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK >>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and >>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for >>>>> the IPQ6018. >>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). >>>>> >>>> >>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? >>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. >>> >>> We need just a confirmation. >>> >>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. >>> >>> | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >>> | compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>> | clock-frequency = <32768>; >>> | #clock-cells = <0>; >>> | }; >>> >>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> >>> >>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the >>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. >>> >>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external >>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". >>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec >>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. >>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same >>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". >>> >>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: >>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> >>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz >>> sleep clock." >>> >>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. >>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values >>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values >>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. >>> >> >> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived >> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. > That's really valuable information to have. Thank you! > >> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses >> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the >> ipq8074.dtsi as well > > Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019), > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482 > > it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by > the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep > clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U) > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 > [...] > sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > > with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" > > (something like this:) > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 > [...] > gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0 > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > > but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an > external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk > should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be: > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > xo 10 10 48000000 0 0 > [...] > gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0 > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > or am I missing/skipping over something important? > Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000. That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will update you asap. Regards, Sricharan
Hello Sricharan, On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 4:42:11 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > >> Hi Christian, > >> > >> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: > >>>> Hi Christian, > >>>> > >>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and > >>>>>> CP01 evaluation board. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> > >>>>>> --- /dev/null > >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> + clocks { > >>>>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > >>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >>>>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; > >>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; > >>>>>> + }; > >>>>>> + > >>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk > >>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. > >>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK > >>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and > >>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for > >>>>> the IPQ6018. > >>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? > >>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. > >>> > >>> We need just a confirmation. > >>> > >>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. > >>> > >>> | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { > >>> | compatible = "fixed-clock"; > >>> | clock-frequency = <32768>; > >>> | #clock-cells = <0>; > >>> | }; > >>> > >>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> > >>> > >>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the > >>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. > >>> > >>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external > >>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". > >>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec > >>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. > >>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same > >>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". > >>> > >>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: > >>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> > >>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz > >>> sleep clock." > >>> > >>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. > >>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values > >>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values > >>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. > >>> > >> > >> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived > >> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. > > That's really valuable information to have. Thank you! > > > >> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses > >> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the > >> ipq8074.dtsi as well > > > > Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019), > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482 > > > > it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by > > the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep > > clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U) > > > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 > > [...] > > sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 > > > > with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" > > > > (something like this:) > > > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 > > [...] > > gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0 > > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 > > > > but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an > > external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk > > should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be: > > > > clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > xo 10 10 48000000 0 0 > > [...] > > gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0 > > gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 > > > > or am I missing/skipping over something important? > > > > Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks > like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000. > > That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise > information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will > update you asap. Thank you for looking this up! I'll definitely stick around for the final verdict. Also, I think the "xo" clk of your IPQ6018 dts should get the "always-on;" property (any maybe sleep_clk as well?). Paul discovered that the QSDK had this extra commit <https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1089385/> (Maybe the changeid can help you look it up internally) For IPQ4019, this enables the high resolution with a 1ns resolution instead of 10ms. (echo q > /proc/sysrq-trigger can be used to check this just look for the "resolution" value before and after.) Cheers, Christian
Hi Christian, On 6/20/2019 9:02 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > Hello Sricharan, > > On Wednesday, June 19, 2019 4:42:11 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >> On 6/15/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:48:48 AM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >>>> Hi Christian, >>>> >>>> On 6/10/2019 5:45 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:09:56 PM CEST Sricharan R wrote: >>>>>> Hi Christian, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/6/2019 2:11 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 7:16 PM Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC and >>>>>>>> CP01 evaluation board. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >>>>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> + clocks { >>>>>>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >>>>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>>>>>> + clock-frequency = <32000>; >>>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; >>>>>>>> + }; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>> Recently-ish, we ran into an issue with the clock-frequency of the sleep_clk >>>>>>> on older IPQ40XX (and IPQ806x) on the OpenWrt Github and ML. >>>>>>> From what I know, the external "32KHz" crystals have 32768 Hz, but the QSDK >>>>>>> declares them at 32000 Hz. Since you probably have access to the BOM and >>>>>>> datasheets. Can you please confirm what's the real clock frequency for >>>>>>> the IPQ6018. >>>>>>> (And maybe also for the sleep_clk of the IPQ4018 as well?). >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What exactly is the issue that you faced ? >>>>>> Looking in to the docs, it is <32000> only on ipq6018 and ipq40xx as well. >>>>> >>>>> We need just a confirmation. >>>>> >>>>> Then again, Currently the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is using 32768 Hz. >>>>> >>>>> | sleep_clk: sleep_clk { >>>>> | compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>>> | clock-frequency = <32768>; >>>>> | #clock-cells = <0>; >>>>> | }; >>>>> >>>>> <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi#L144> >>>>> >>>>> Which makes sense, because all previous Qualcomm Atheros MIPS and the >>>>> future IPQ8072 SoCs have been either using or deriving a 32768 Hz clock. >>>>> >>>>> For example: The AR9344 derives the clock from the 25MHz/40MHz external >>>>> oscillator. This is explained in "8.16.9 Derived RTC Clock (DERIVED_RTC_CLK)". >>>>> Which mentions that the "32KHz" clock interval is 30.5 usec / 30.48 usec >>>>> depending whenever the external reference crystal has 40MHz or 25MHz. >>>>> (1/30.5usec = 32.7868852 kilohertz!). The QCA9558 datasheet says the same >>>>> in "10.19.11 Derived RTC Clock". >>>>> >>>>> For IPQ8072: I point to the post by Sven Eckelmann on the OpenWrt ML: >>>>> <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-May/017131.html> >>>>> "I was only able to verify for IPQ8072 that it had a 32.768 KHz >>>>> sleep clock." >>>>> >>>>> So this is pretty much "why there is an issue", it's confusing. >>>>> Is possible can you please look if there are (fixed) divisors values >>>>> listed in the documentation or the registers and bits that the values >>>>> are stored in? Because then we could just calculate it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really sorry for the confusion. So looking little more, SLEEP_CLK is derived >>>> from an external 38.4MHZ crystal, it is 32.768 KHZ. >>> That's really valuable information to have. Thank you! >>> >>>> Somehow the clk freq plan etc seems to mention them only as .032 MHZ and misses >>>> out. That means i will correct the patch for 32768 and probably the >>>> ipq8074.dtsi as well >>> >>> Ok, there's one more issue that Paul found (at least with the IPQ4019), >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1099482 >>> >>> it seems that the "sleep_clk" node in the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi is not used by >>> the gcc-ipq4019.c clk driver. this causes both wifi rtc_clks and the usb sleep >>> clks to dangle in the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary (from a RT-AC58U) >>> >>> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 >>> [...] >>> sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 0 0 0 >>> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 >>> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 0 0 0 >>> >>> with his patch the /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary looks "better" >>> >>> (something like this:) >>> >>> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> xo 9 9 48000000 0 0 >>> [...] >>> gcc_sleep_clk_src 5 5 32000 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 >>> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 >>> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32000 0 0 >>> >>> but judging from your comment "SLEEP_CLK is derived from an >>> external 38.4MHZ crystal" the gcc_sleep_clk_src / sleep_clk >>> should have xo as the parent. so the ideal output should be: >>> >>> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate accuracy phase >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> xo 10 10 48000000 0 0 >>> [...] >>> gcc_sleep_clk 5 5 32768 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss5g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 >>> gcc_wcss2g_rtc_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 >>> gcc_usb3_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 >>> gcc_usb2_sleep_clk 1 1 32768 0 0 >>> >>> or am I missing/skipping over something important? >>> >> >> Sorry for the delayed response. So what i said above (32768 clk) looks >> like true only for ipq8074. For ipq4019, looks like 32000. >> >> That means, there is still some thing unclear. I am checking for precise >> information from HW team for ipq4019/8074/6018. Please hang on, will >> update you asap. > > Thank you for looking this up! I'll definitely stick around for the final > verdict. > So the HW guys responded and as per that, ipq4019/ipq6018 it is 32000. It is derived from a 48M wifi refclk 48M wifi ref clk -> [/2 divider] -> [/750 divider] -> sleep_clk (32000) In case of ipq8074, it is derived from the pmic and 32768. > Also, I think the "xo" clk of your IPQ6018 dts should get the > "always-on;" property (any maybe sleep_clk as well?). > > Paul discovered that the QSDK had this extra commit > <https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1089385/> > (Maybe the changeid can help you look it up internally) > > For IPQ4019, this enables the high resolution with a 1ns resolution > instead of 10ms. > ho ok, this patch is needed. Regards, Sricharan
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile index 21d548f..ac22dbb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8016-sbc.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += apq8096-db820c.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq8074-hk01.dtb +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += ipq6018-cp01-c1.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-mtp.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8992-bullhead-rev-101.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8994-angler-rev-101.dtb diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac7cb22 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * IPQ6018 CP01 board device tree source + * + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + */ + +/dts-v1/; + +#include "ipq6018.dtsi" + +/ { + #address-cells = <0x2>; + #size-cells = <0x2>; + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018/AP-CP01-C1"; + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-cp01", "qcom,ipq6018"; + interrupt-parent = <&intc>; +}; + +&tlmm { + uart_pins: uart_pins { + mux { + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; + function = "blsp2_uart"; + drive-strength = <8>; + bias-pull-down; + }; + }; +}; + +&blsp1_uart3 { + pinctrl-0 = <&uart_pins>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + status = "ok"; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 0000000..79cccdd --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * IPQ6018 SoC device tree source + * + * Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h> + +/ { + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ6018"; + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018"; + + chosen { + bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 rw init=/init"; + bootargs-append = " swiotlb=1 clk_ignore_unused"; + }; + + reserved-memory { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + tz:tz@48500000 { + no-map; + reg = <0x0 0x48500000 0x0 0x00200000>; + }; + }; + + soc: soc { + #address-cells = <0x1>; + #size-cells = <0x1>; + ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; + dma-ranges; + compatible = "simple-bus"; + + intc: interrupt-controller@b000000 { + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2"; + interrupt-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <0x3>; + reg = <0xb000000 0x1000>, <0xb002000 0x1000>; + }; + + timer { + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 3 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 4 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, + <GIC_PPI 1 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; + }; + + timer@b120000 { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges; + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer-mem"; + reg = <0xb120000 0x1000>; + clock-frequency = <19200000>; + + frame@b120000 { + frame-number = <0>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, + <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb121000 0x1000>, + <0xb122000 0x1000>; + }; + + frame@b123000 { + frame-number = <1>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb123000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + frame@b124000 { + frame-number = <2>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb124000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + frame@b125000 { + frame-number = <3>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb125000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + frame@b126000 { + frame-number = <4>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb126000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + frame@b127000 { + frame-number = <5>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb127000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + frame@b128000 { + frame-number = <6>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xb128000 0x1000>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + }; + + gcc: gcc@1800000 { + compatible = "qcom,gcc-ipq6018"; + reg = <0x1800000 0x80000>; + #clock-cells = <0x1>; + #reset-cells = <0x1>; + }; + + blsp1_uart3: serial@78b1000 { + compatible = "qcom,msm-uartdm-v1.4", "qcom,msm-uartdm"; + reg = <0x78b1000 0x200>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 306 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_UART3_APPS_CLK>, + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>; + clock-names = "core", "iface"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + tlmm: pinctrl@1000000 { + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pinctrl"; + reg = <0x1000000 0x300000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0xd0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; + gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <0x2>; + interrupt-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <0x2>; + + uart_pins: uart_pins { + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45"; + function = "blsp2_uart"; + drive-strength = <8>; + bias-pull-down; + }; + }; + }; + + psci: psci { + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0"; + method = "smc"; + }; + + cpus: cpus { + #address-cells = <0x1>; + #size-cells = <0x0>; + + CPU0: cpu@0 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; + reg = <0x0>; + enable-method = "psci"; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + + CPU1: cpu@1 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; + enable-method = "psci"; + reg = <0x1>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + + CPU2: cpu@2 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; + enable-method = "psci"; + reg = <0x2>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + + CPU3: cpu@3 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; + enable-method = "psci"; + reg = <0x3>; + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; + }; + + L2_0: l2-cache { + compatible = "cache"; + cache-level = <0x2>; + }; + }; + + pmuv8: pmu { + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>; + }; + + clocks { + sleep_clk: sleep_clk { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <32000>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + }; + + xo: xo { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <24000000>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + }; + + bias_pll_cc_clk { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <300000000>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + }; + + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <416500000>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + }; + + usb3phy_0_cc_pipe_clk { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <125000000>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + }; + }; +};