Message ID | 20190623151313.970-1-tranmanphong@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cleanup cppcheck signed shifting errors | expand |
There are errors with cppcheck "Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour errors" This is just a mirror changing. V2: Using BIT() macro instead of (1UL << nr) Phong Tran (15): arm: perf: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: davinci: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: ep93xx: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: exynos: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: footbridge: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: imx: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: ks8695: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: mmp: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: omap2: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: orion5x: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: pxa: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: vexpress: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: mm: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors ARM: bpf: cleanup cppcheck shifting error ARM: vfp: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 6 +- arch/arm/mach-davinci/ddr2.h | 6 +- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/soc.h | 132 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h | 64 +++++++++--------- arch/arm/mach-ks8695/regs-pci.h | 4 +- arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-mmp2.h | 40 +++++------ arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.h | 76 ++++++++++----------- arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c | 8 +-- arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c | 4 +- arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 12 ++-- arch/arm/mm/fault.h | 6 +- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 2 +- arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h | 8 +-- 16 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:50:50PM +0700, Phong Tran wrote: > There are errors with cppcheck > > "Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour errors" > > This is just a mirror changing. "mirror" ? Apart from that and the extra unnecessary parens (which ought to be cleaned up) this looks fine to me. When there's too many parens next to each other, it makes reading the expression more difficult - and that is definitely bad, so please avoid unecessary parens where possible. Thanks. > > V2: Using BIT() macro instead of (1UL << nr) > > Phong Tran (15): > arm: perf: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: davinci: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: ep93xx: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: exynos: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: footbridge: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: imx: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: ks8695: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: mmp: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: omap2: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: orion5x: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: pxa: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: vexpress: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: mm: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > ARM: bpf: cleanup cppcheck shifting error > ARM: vfp: cleanup cppcheck shifting errors > > arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/ddr2.h | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/soc.h | 132 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/iomux-mx3.h | 64 +++++++++--------- > arch/arm/mach-ks8695/regs-pci.h | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-mmp2.h | 40 +++++------ > arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.h | 76 ++++++++++----------- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-orion5x/pci.c | 8 +-- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 12 ++-- > arch/arm/mm/fault.h | 6 +- > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/vfp/vfpinstr.h | 8 +-- > 16 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0 > >
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:50:50PM +0700, Phong Tran wrote: > There are errors with cppcheck > > "Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour errors" As I've already told you; your checker is bad. That is not in face undefined behaviour in the kernel. That's not to say you shouldn't clean up the code, but don't give broken checkout output as a reason.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 05:27:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:50:50PM +0700, Phong Tran wrote: > > There are errors with cppcheck > > > > "Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour errors" > > As I've already told you; your checker is bad. That is not in face Bah, fact, typing hard. > undefined behaviour in the kernel. > > That's not to say you shouldn't clean up the code, but don't give broken > checkout output as a reason.