mbox series

[0/3] zfcp: fixes for the zFCP device driver

Message ID cover.1562098940.git.bblock@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series zfcp: fixes for the zFCP device driver | expand

Message

Benjamin Block July 2, 2019, 9:01 p.m. UTC
Hello James and Martin,

here are some fixes for the zFCP device driver. I am rather certain this
won't fit into this rc-cycle anymore.. I just found these last week and
with internal reviews and tests I was regrettably not able to post these
any sooner.

So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear to
me.

The first patch is the "most urgent" of the three, although nothing
too terrible happens if we hit it.

Reviews are welcome from everyone, obviously.

Benjamin Block (3):
  zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing seqno
    errors
  zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing wrong
    traces
  zfcp: fix GCC compiler warning emitted with -Wmaybe-uninitialized

 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c |  7 +++++
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Martin K. Petersen July 12, 2019, 1:06 a.m. UTC | #1
Benjamin,

> So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
> them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear
> to me.

A fix is a fix. Applied the series to 5.3/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
Benjamin Block July 12, 2019, 1:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:06:08PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Benjamin,
> 
> > So please consider them for the next cycle. Or should I not have send
> > them in that case? Sorry, this step of the process was a bit unclear
> > to me.
> 
> A fix is a fix. Applied the series to 5.3/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
> 

Thanks Martin.