Message ID | 20190708125554.3863901-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] net/mlx5e: xsk: dynamically allocate mlx5e_channel_param | expand |
On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The structure is too large to put on the stack, resulting in a > warning on 32-bit ARM: > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c:59:5: error: stack frame size of 1344 bytes in function > 'mlx5e_open_xsk' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] > > Use kzalloc() instead. > > Fixes: a038e9794541 ("net/mlx5e: Add XSK zero-copy support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c | 25 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c > index aaffa6f68dc0..db9bbec68dbf 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c > @@ -60,24 +60,28 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, > struct mlx5e_xsk_param *xsk, struct xdp_umem *umem, > struct mlx5e_channel *c) > { > - struct mlx5e_channel_param cparam = {}; > + struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam; > struct dim_cq_moder icocq_moder = {}; > int err; > > if (!mlx5e_validate_xsk_param(params, xsk, priv->mdev)) > return -EINVAL; > > - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam); > + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL); Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function to keep code uniform. > + if (!cparam) > + return -ENOMEM; > > - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam.rx_cq, &c->xskrq.cq); > + mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, cparam); > + > + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam->rx_cq, &c->xskrq.cq); > if (unlikely(err)) > - return err; > + goto err_kfree_cparam; > > - err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam.rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq); > + err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam->rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq); > if (unlikely(err)) > goto err_close_rx_cq; > > - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam.tx_cq, &c->xsksq.cq); > + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam->tx_cq, &c->xsksq.cq); > if (unlikely(err)) > goto err_close_rq; > > @@ -87,18 +91,18 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, > * is disabled and then reenabled, but the SQ continues receiving CQEs > * from the old UMEM. > */ > - err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam.xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, true); > + err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam->xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, true); > if (unlikely(err)) > goto err_close_tx_cq; > > - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam.icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq); > + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam->icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq); > if (unlikely(err)) > goto err_close_sq; > > /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be > * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU. > */ > - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq); > + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq); > if (unlikely(err)) > goto err_close_icocq; > Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path. Thanks! > @@ -123,6 +127,9 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, > err_close_rx_cq: > mlx5e_close_cq(&c->xskrq.cq); > > +err_kfree_cparam: > + kfree(cparam); > + > return err; > } > >
On 2019-07-08 18:16, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: > On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam); >> + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL); > > Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although > the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be > no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function > to keep code uniform. > >> /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be >> * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU. >> */ >> - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq); >> + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq); >> if (unlikely(err)) >> goto err_close_icocq; >> > > Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path. Arnd, I'm going to take over your patch and respin it, addressing my own comments, because it's been quite a while, and we want to have this fix. Thanks for spotting it.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:21 PM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com> wrote: > On 2019-07-08 18:16, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote: > > On 2019-07-08 15:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam); > >> + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Similar code in mlx5e_open_channels (en_main.c) uses kvzalloc. Although > > the struct is currently smaller than a page anyway, and there should be > > no difference in behavior now, I suggest using the same alloc function > > to keep code uniform. > > > >> /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be > >> * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU. > >> */ > >> - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq); > >> + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq); > >> if (unlikely(err)) > >> goto err_close_icocq; > >> > > > > Here is kfree missing. It's a memory leak in the good path. > > Arnd, I'm going to take over your patch and respin it, addressing my own > comments, because it's been quite a while, and we want to have this fix. > > Thanks for spotting it. Thanks for taking care of it now. I was planning to do a respin, but the reply got lost in the depth of my inbox so I forgot about it. Arnd
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c index aaffa6f68dc0..db9bbec68dbf 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c @@ -60,24 +60,28 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, struct mlx5e_xsk_param *xsk, struct xdp_umem *umem, struct mlx5e_channel *c) { - struct mlx5e_channel_param cparam = {}; + struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam; struct dim_cq_moder icocq_moder = {}; int err; if (!mlx5e_validate_xsk_param(params, xsk, priv->mdev)) return -EINVAL; - mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, &cparam); + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(*cparam), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cparam) + return -ENOMEM; - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam.rx_cq, &c->xskrq.cq); + mlx5e_build_xsk_cparam(priv, params, xsk, cparam); + + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->rx_cq_moderation, &cparam->rx_cq, &c->xskrq.cq); if (unlikely(err)) - return err; + goto err_kfree_cparam; - err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam.rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq); + err = mlx5e_open_rq(c, params, &cparam->rq, xsk, umem, &c->xskrq); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_close_rx_cq; - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam.tx_cq, &c->xsksq.cq); + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, params->tx_cq_moderation, &cparam->tx_cq, &c->xsksq.cq); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_close_rq; @@ -87,18 +91,18 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, * is disabled and then reenabled, but the SQ continues receiving CQEs * from the old UMEM. */ - err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam.xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, true); + err = mlx5e_open_xdpsq(c, params, &cparam->xdp_sq, umem, &c->xsksq, true); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_close_tx_cq; - err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam.icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq); + err = mlx5e_open_cq(c, icocq_moder, &cparam->icosq_cq, &c->xskicosq.cq); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_close_sq; /* Create a dedicated SQ for posting NOPs whenever we need an IRQ to be * triggered and NAPI to be called on the correct CPU. */ - err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam.icosq, &c->xskicosq); + err = mlx5e_open_icosq(c, params, &cparam->icosq, &c->xskicosq); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_close_icocq; @@ -123,6 +127,9 @@ int mlx5e_open_xsk(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5e_params *params, err_close_rx_cq: mlx5e_close_cq(&c->xskrq.cq); +err_kfree_cparam: + kfree(cparam); + return err; }
The structure is too large to put on the stack, resulting in a warning on 32-bit ARM: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c:59:5: error: stack frame size of 1344 bytes in function 'mlx5e_open_xsk' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=] Use kzalloc() instead. Fixes: a038e9794541 ("net/mlx5e: Add XSK zero-copy support") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/setup.c | 25 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)