Message ID | 1564982518-32163-11-git-send-email-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6358 | expand |
Hi, The subject should be: "rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC" On 05/08/2019 13:21:58+0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote: > From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com> > > This add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC. Driver using > compatible data to store different RTC_WRTGR address offset. > > Review-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c > index 828def7..e23c215 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include <linux/irqdomain.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h> > @@ -19,7 +20,8 @@ > #define RTC_BBPU 0x0000 > #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY BIT(6) > > -#define RTC_WRTGR 0x003c > +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6358 0x3a > +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6397 0x3c > > #define RTC_IRQ_STA 0x0002 > #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL BIT(0) > @@ -63,6 +65,10 @@ > #define RTC_NUM_YEARS 128 > #define RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET (RTC_MIN_YEAR - RTC_BASE_YEAR) > > +struct mtk_rtc_compatible { I would name that struct mtk_rtc_data > + u32 wrtgr_addr; and this member should be wrtgr_offset or simply wrtgr. > +}; > + > struct mt6397_rtc { > struct device *dev; > struct rtc_device *rtc_dev; > @@ -70,7 +76,25 @@ struct mt6397_rtc { > struct regmap *regmap; > int irq; > u32 addr_base; > + const struct mtk_rtc_compatible *dev_comp; > +}; > + > +static const struct mtk_rtc_compatible mt6358_rtc_compat = { > + .wrtgr_addr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6358, > +}; > + > +static const struct mtk_rtc_compatible mt6397_rtc_compat = { > + .wrtgr_addr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6397, > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc", > + .data = (void *)&mt6358_rtc_compat, }, > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", > + .data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_compat, }, > + {} > }; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match); > > static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc) > { > @@ -78,7 +102,8 @@ static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc) > int ret; > u32 data; > > - ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_WRTGR, 1); > + ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, > + rtc->addr_base + rtc->dev_comp->wrtgr_addr, 1); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > @@ -324,6 +349,7 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct resource *res; > struct mt6397_chip *mt6397_chip = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > struct mt6397_rtc *rtc; > + const struct of_device_id *of_id; > int ret; > > rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct mt6397_rtc), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -333,6 +359,13 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > rtc->addr_base = res->start; > > + of_id = of_match_device(mt6397_rtc_of_match, &pdev->dev); > + if (!of_id) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to probe of_node\n"); > + return -EINVAL; This will never happen because probe would not be called if there is no match. You could also use of_device_get_match_data to avoid having to move the of_device_id table. > + } > + rtc->dev_comp = of_id->data; > + > rtc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > if (rtc->irq < 0) > return rtc->irq; > @@ -408,12 +441,6 @@ static int mt6397_rtc_resume(struct device *dev) > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_rtc_suspend, > mt6397_rtc_resume); > > -static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = { > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", }, > - { } > -}; > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match); > - > static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "mt6397-rtc", > -- > 2.6.4 >
Hi Belloni, On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 09:23 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > The subject should be: > > "rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC" Will be changed at next patch. > > +struct mtk_rtc_compatible { > > I would name that struct mtk_rtc_data > > > + u32 wrtgr_addr; > > and this member should be wrtgr_offset or simply wrtgr. > Will be changed at next patch. > > > > + of_id = of_match_device(mt6397_rtc_of_match, &pdev->dev); > > + if (!of_id) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to probe of_node\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > This will never happen because probe would not be called if there is no > match. You could also use of_device_get_match_data to avoid having to > move the of_device_id table. > Will use of_device_get_match_data() function instead of of_match_device() function.
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c index 828def7..e23c215 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h> @@ -19,7 +20,8 @@ #define RTC_BBPU 0x0000 #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY BIT(6) -#define RTC_WRTGR 0x003c +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6358 0x3a +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6397 0x3c #define RTC_IRQ_STA 0x0002 #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL BIT(0) @@ -63,6 +65,10 @@ #define RTC_NUM_YEARS 128 #define RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET (RTC_MIN_YEAR - RTC_BASE_YEAR) +struct mtk_rtc_compatible { + u32 wrtgr_addr; +}; + struct mt6397_rtc { struct device *dev; struct rtc_device *rtc_dev; @@ -70,7 +76,25 @@ struct mt6397_rtc { struct regmap *regmap; int irq; u32 addr_base; + const struct mtk_rtc_compatible *dev_comp; +}; + +static const struct mtk_rtc_compatible mt6358_rtc_compat = { + .wrtgr_addr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6358, +}; + +static const struct mtk_rtc_compatible mt6397_rtc_compat = { + .wrtgr_addr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6397, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc", + .data = (void *)&mt6358_rtc_compat, }, + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", + .data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_compat, }, + {} }; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match); static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc) { @@ -78,7 +102,8 @@ static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc) int ret; u32 data; - ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_WRTGR, 1); + ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, + rtc->addr_base + rtc->dev_comp->wrtgr_addr, 1); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -324,6 +349,7 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct resource *res; struct mt6397_chip *mt6397_chip = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct mt6397_rtc *rtc; + const struct of_device_id *of_id; int ret; rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct mt6397_rtc), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -333,6 +359,13 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); rtc->addr_base = res->start; + of_id = of_match_device(mt6397_rtc_of_match, &pdev->dev); + if (!of_id) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to probe of_node\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + rtc->dev_comp = of_id->data; + rtc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (rtc->irq < 0) return rtc->irq; @@ -408,12 +441,6 @@ static int mt6397_rtc_resume(struct device *dev) static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_rtc_suspend, mt6397_rtc_resume); -static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = { - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", }, - { } -}; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match); - static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = { .driver = { .name = "mt6397-rtc",