Message ID | 20190808023811.GA14001@embeddedor (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Commit | 1f7585f30a3af595ac07f610b807c738c9e3baab |
Headers | show |
Series | ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-through | expand |
Hi! On 08/08/2019 04:38, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm): > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do': > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may > fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state)); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here > case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: > ^~~~ > > Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is > modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c > index 1c9a4be8b503..1c05c5bf7e5c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t) > * FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly > * initialised state information on the first fault. > */ > + /* Fall through */ > > case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: > crunch_task_release(thread); >
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c index 1c9a4be8b503..1c05c5bf7e5c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t) * FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly * initialised state information on the first fault. */ + /* Fall through */ case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: crunch_task_release(thread);
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm): arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do': arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: ^~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)