mbox series

[GIT,PULL] Bitmain changes for v5.4

Message ID 20190803124404.GA11140@Mani-XPS-13-9360 (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [GIT,PULL] Bitmain changes for v5.4 | expand

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/linux-bitmain.git tags/bitmain-soc-5.4

Message

Manivannan Sadhasivam Aug. 3, 2019, 12:44 p.m. UTC
Hi Arnd, Olof,

Please consider pulling the Bitmain SoC changes for v5.4. These changes
are supposed to be pulled in for 5.3 but I was waiting for the common
clock driver to be reviewed (still not), hence missing the timeline.
Details of the changes are in the signed tag.

Thanks,
Mani

---

The following changes since commit 609488bc979f99f805f34e9a32c1e3b71179d10b:

  Linux 5.3-rc2 (2019-07-28 12:47:02 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/linux-bitmain.git tags/bitmain-soc-5.4

for you to fetch changes up to ca33f735b1195e9bafaa66f24dec40ea666e9840:

  arm64: dts: bitmain: Modify pin controller memory map (2019-08-03 17:51:21 +0530)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bitmain SoC changes for v5.4:

Most of the basic infrastructure is completed for BM1880 SoC except
common clock support. We are still couple of patchset away from
booting a distro from eMMC/SD with mainline. Below are the changes
for this cycle:

- Added Reset controller support to BM1880 SoC based on reset-simple
  driver.
- Modified pinctrl memory map for BM1880 SoC. The initial pinctrl support
  included the PWM registers as a part of the pinctrl memory map. But this
  turned out to be useless as PWM registers are not handling any pin muxing
  at all. So removed the PWM registers from pinctrl memory map.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Manivannan Sadhasivam (2):
      arm64: dts: bitmain: Add reset controller support for BM1880 SoC
      arm64: dts: bitmain: Modify pin controller memory map

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/bitmain/bm1880.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Sept. 4, 2019, 12:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 2:44 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>
> Please consider pulling the Bitmain SoC changes for v5.4. These changes
> are supposed to be pulled in for 5.3 but I was waiting for the common
> clock driver to be reviewed (still not), hence missing the timeline.
> Details of the changes are in the signed tag.

I just found this while going through old emails, it seems I never pulled it
so far and did that now.

Please note that our address has changed, and new pull requests and
patches should go to soc@kernel.org so they end up in the patchwork
at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/ where you can
see the status.

Sorry for missing this earlier.

      Arnd
Manivannan Sadhasivam Sept. 4, 2019, 4:33 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Arnd,

On 4 September 2019 6:17:59 PM IST, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 2:44 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
><manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>>
>> Please consider pulling the Bitmain SoC changes for v5.4. These
>changes
>> are supposed to be pulled in for 5.3 but I was waiting for the common
>> clock driver to be reviewed (still not), hence missing the timeline.
>> Details of the changes are in the signed tag.
>
>I just found this while going through old emails, it seems I never
>pulled it
>so far and did that now.
>
>Please note that our address has changed, and new pull requests and
>patches should go to soc@kernel.org so they end up in the patchwork
>at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/ where you can
>see the status.
>

Okay, will use this address for future PR's. 

Thanks, 
Mani

>Sorry for missing this earlier.
>
>      Arnd