diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] mm/page_ext: support to record the last stack of page

Message ID 20190909085339.25350-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2,1/2] mm/page_ext: support to record the last stack of page | expand

Commit Message

Walter Wu Sept. 9, 2019, 8:53 a.m. UTC
KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
to see memory corruption caused by page.

What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).

Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
---
 mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

David Hildenbrand Sept. 9, 2019, 10:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On 09.09.19 10:53, Walter Wu wrote:
> KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> to see memory corruption caused by page.
> 
> What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
>  #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
>  	&page_idle_ops,
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> +	&page_stack_ops,
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  static unsigned long total_usage;
> 

Are you sure this patch compiles?

t460s: ~/git/linux virtio-mem $ git grep page_stack_ops
t460s: ~/git/linux virtio-mem $
Vlastimil Babka Sept. 9, 2019, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/9/19 10:53 AM, Walter Wu wrote:
> KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> to see memory corruption caused by page.
> 
> What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>

There's no point in separating this from patch 2 (and as David pointed 
out, doesn't compile).

> ---
>   mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
>   #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
>   	&page_idle_ops,
>   #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> +	&page_stack_ops,
> +#endif
>   };
>   
>   static unsigned long total_usage;
>
Walter Wu Sept. 10, 2019, 1:07 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 12:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.09.19 10:53, Walter Wu wrote:
> > KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> > to see memory corruption caused by page.
> > 
> > What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> > page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> > last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> > index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> > @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> >  	&page_idle_ops,
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > +	&page_stack_ops,
> > +#endif
> >  };
> >  
> >  static unsigned long total_usage;
> > 
> 
> Are you sure this patch compiles?
> 
This is patchsets, it need another patch2.
We have verified it by running KASAN UT on Qemu.
Kirill A. Shutemov Sept. 10, 2019, 9:31 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:07:49AM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 12:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 09.09.19 10:53, Walter Wu wrote:
> > > KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> > > to see memory corruption caused by page.
> > > 
> > > What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> > > page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> > > last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
> > >  #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > >  	&page_idle_ops,
> > >  #endif
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > > +	&page_stack_ops,
> > > +#endif
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static unsigned long total_usage;
> > > 
> > 
> > Are you sure this patch compiles?
> > 
> This is patchsets, it need another patch2.
> We have verified it by running KASAN UT on Qemu.

Any patchset must be bisectable: do not break anything in the middle of
patchset.
Walter Wu Sept. 10, 2019, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 12:31 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:07:49AM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 12:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 09.09.19 10:53, Walter Wu wrote:
> > > > KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> > > > to see memory corruption caused by page.
> > > > 
> > > > What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> > > > page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> > > > last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
> > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > > >  	&page_idle_ops,
> > > >  #endif
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > > > +	&page_stack_ops,
> > > > +#endif
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  static unsigned long total_usage;
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Are you sure this patch compiles?
> > > 
> > This is patchsets, it need another patch2.
> > We have verified it by running KASAN UT on Qemu.
> 
> Any patchset must be bisectable: do not break anything in the middle of
> patchset.
> 

Thanks your reminder.
I should explain complete message at commit log.
Our patchsets is below:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/104
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/123
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
--- a/mm/page_ext.c
+++ b/mm/page_ext.c
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@  static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
 #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
 	&page_idle_ops,
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
+	&page_stack_ops,
+#endif
 };
 
 static unsigned long total_usage;