Message ID | 20190903145536.3390-1-dja@axtens.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory | expand |
Hi Daniel, Are any other patches required prior to this series ? I have tried to apply it on later powerpc/merge branch without success: [root@localhost linux-powerpc]# git am /root/Downloads/kasan-support-backing-vmalloc-space-with-real-shadow-memory\(1\).patch Applying: kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory .git/rebase-apply/patch:389: trailing whitespace. * (1) (2) (3) error: patch failed: lib/Kconfig.kasan:142 error: lib/Kconfig.kasan: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001 kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory The copy of the patch that failed is found in: .git/rebase-apply/patch When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". [root@localhost linux-powerpc]# git am -3 /root/Downloads/kasan-support-backing-vmalloc-space-with-real-shadow-memory\(1\).patch Applying: kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (include/linux/vmalloc.h). error: could not build fake ancestor Patch failed at 0001 kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory The copy of the patch that failed is found in: .git/rebase-apply/patch When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". Christophe On 09/03/2019 02:55 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Currently, vmalloc space is backed by the early shadow page. This > means that kasan is incompatible with VMAP_STACK. > > This series provides a mechanism to back vmalloc space with real, > dynamically allocated memory. I have only wired up x86, because that's > the only currently supported arch I can work with easily, but it's > very easy to wire up other architectures, and it appears that there is > some work-in-progress code to do this on arm64 and s390. > > This has been discussed before in the context of VMAP_STACK: > - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202009 > - https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/22/198 > - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/19/822 > > In terms of implementation details: > > Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full > page of shadow space. Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would > therefore be wasteful. Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings > use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to > KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE. > > Instead, share backing space across multiple mappings. Allocate a > backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of > the shadow region. This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings > later on. > > We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow > memory. > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190725055503.19507-1-dja@axtens.net/ > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190729142108.23343-1-dja@axtens.net/ > Address review comments: > - Patch 1: use kasan_unpoison_shadow's built-in handling of > ranges that do not align to a full shadow byte > - Patch 3: prepopulate pgds rather than faulting things in > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190731071550.31814-1-dja@axtens.net/ > Address comments from Mark Rutland: > - kasan_populate_vmalloc is a better name > - handle concurrency correctly > - various nits and cleanups > - relax module alignment in KASAN_VMALLOC case > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190815001636.12235-1-dja@axtens.net/ > Changes to patch 1 only: > - Integrate Mark's rework, thanks Mark! > - handle the case where kasan_populate_shadow might fail > - poision shadow on free, allowing the alloc path to just > unpoision memory that it uses > v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190830003821.10737-1-dja@axtens.net/ > Address comments from Christophe Leroy: > - Fix some issues with my descriptions in commit messages and docs > - Dynamically free unused shadow pages by hooking into the vmap book-keeping > - Split out the test into a separate patch > - Optional patch to track the number of pages allocated > - minor checkpatch cleanups > v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190902112028.23773-1-dja@axtens.net/ > Properly guard freeing pages in patch 1, drop debugging code. > v7: Add a TLB flush on freeing, thanks Mark Rutland. > Explain more clearly how I think freeing is concurrency-safe. > > Daniel Axtens (5): > kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory > kasan: add test for vmalloc > fork: support VMAP_STACK with KASAN_VMALLOC > x86/kasan: support KASAN_VMALLOC > kasan debug: track pages allocated for vmalloc shadow > > Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 63 ++++++++ > arch/Kconfig | 9 +- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 60 ++++++++ > include/linux/kasan.h | 31 ++++ > include/linux/moduleloader.h | 2 +- > include/linux/vmalloc.h | 12 ++ > kernel/fork.c | 4 + > lib/Kconfig.kasan | 16 +++ > lib/test_kasan.c | 26 ++++ > mm/kasan/common.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/kasan/generic_report.c | 3 + > mm/kasan/kasan.h | 1 + > mm/vmalloc.c | 45 +++++- > 14 files changed, 497 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >
Hi Christophe, > Are any other patches required prior to this series ? I have tried to > apply it on later powerpc/merge branch without success: It applies on the latest linux-next. I didn't base it on powerpc/* because it's generic. Regards, Daniel
Le 11/09/2019 à 13:20, Daniel Axtens a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > >> Are any other patches required prior to this series ? I have tried to >> apply it on later powerpc/merge branch without success: > > It applies on the latest linux-next. I didn't base it on powerpc/* > because it's generic. > Ok, thanks. I backported it to powerpc/merge and I'm testing it on PPC32 with VMAP_STACK. Got a few challenges but it is working now. Christophe