Message ID | cover.1568187525.git.lukas@wunner.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Speed up SPI simplex transfers on Raspberry Pi | expand |
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:15:30PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > Extend the BCM2835 SPI driver to handle simplex transfers internally, > thereby reducing their latency and CPU usage and obviating the need to > have the SPI core convert to full-duplex via SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX/RX. Whatever you're doing to send these is still not sending the patches in order: 779 N T 09/11 Lukas Wunner (1.6K) [PATCH v2 00/10] Speed up SPI simplex t 780 N T 09/11 Lukas Wunner (2.1K) ├─>[PATCH v2 02/10] dmaengine: bcm2835: 781 N T 09/11 Lukas Wunner (1.3K) ├─>[PATCH v2 01/10] dmaengine: bcm2835: 782 N T 09/11 Lukas Wunner (2.6K) ├─>[PATCH v2 03/10] spi: Guarantee cac
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:47:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:15:30PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > Extend the BCM2835 SPI driver to handle simplex transfers internally, > > thereby reducing their latency and CPU usage and obviating the need to > > have the SPI core convert to full-duplex via SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX/RX. > > Whatever you're doing to send these is still not sending the > patches in order: I use "git format-patch --thread=shallow", then use a Perl script to change the Date: header and send out the raw messages with msmtp. I suspect the incorrect order may be because all messages use the same Date: header and you're using "sort_aux=date-sent" in Mutt. I'll change my workflow to use incremental Date: headers. Sorry for the inconvenience. You can work around the incorrect order by limiting to messages from me (type "l", enter "~f lukas@wunner.de"), then ordering by subject (type "o", then "s"). Thanks, Lukas
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 01:43:52PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > I use "git format-patch --thread=shallow", then use a Perl script > to change the Date: header and send out the raw messages with msmtp. Sounds like your perl script could just be git send-email? > I suspect the incorrect order may be because all messages use the > same Date: header and you're using "sort_aux=date-sent" in Mutt. or that the messages are getting reordered in transit by the intervening MTAs and it's falling back on delivery order lacking any other information.