diff mbox series

[v1,1/2] block: bypass blk_set_runtime_active for uninitialized q->dev

Message ID 1568183562-18241-2-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v1,1/2] block: bypass blk_set_runtime_active for uninitialized q->dev | expand

Commit Message

Stanley Chu Sept. 11, 2019, 6:32 a.m. UTC
Some devices may skip blk_pm_runtime_init() and have null pointer
in its request_queue->dev. For example, SCSI devices of UFS Well-Known
LUNs.

Currently the null pointer is checked by the user of
blk_set_runtime_active(), i.e., scsi_dev_type_resume(). It is better to
check it by blk_set_runtime_active() itself instead of by its users.

Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
---
 block/blk-pm.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Jens Axboe Sept. 11, 2019, 10:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/11/19 12:32 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Some devices may skip blk_pm_runtime_init() and have null pointer
> in its request_queue->dev. For example, SCSI devices of UFS Well-Known
> LUNs.
> 
> Currently the null pointer is checked by the user of
> blk_set_runtime_active(), i.e., scsi_dev_type_resume(). It is better to
> check it by blk_set_runtime_active() itself instead of by its users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-pm.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-pm.c b/block/blk-pm.c
> index 0a028c189897..56ed94f7a2a3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-pm.c
> +++ b/block/blk-pm.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_post_runtime_resume);
>    */
>   void blk_set_runtime_active(struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> +	if (!q->dev)
> +		return;
> +
>   	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
>   	q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
>   	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);

I'd prefer just doing:

	if (q->dev) {
		...
	}

instead. Other than that little complaint, looks good to me.
Stanley Chu Sept. 12, 2019, 8:33 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jens,

> >   void blk_set_runtime_active(struct request_queue *q)
> >   {
> > +	if (!q->dev)
> > +		return;
> > +
> >   	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> >   	q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
> >   	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);
> 
> I'd prefer just doing:
> 
> 	if (q->dev) {
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> instead. Other than that little complaint, looks good to me.
> 

OK! I will change it in v2.

Thanks,
Stanley
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/blk-pm.c b/block/blk-pm.c
index 0a028c189897..56ed94f7a2a3 100644
--- a/block/blk-pm.c
+++ b/block/blk-pm.c
@@ -207,6 +207,9 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_post_runtime_resume);
  */
 void blk_set_runtime_active(struct request_queue *q)
 {
+	if (!q->dev)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 	q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);