| Message ID | 20191008113523.13601-2-andrew@aj.id.au (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | clk: aspeed: Expose RMII RCLK gate for MACs 1-2 on AST2500 | expand |
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 11:34, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote: > > The AST2500 has an explicit gate for the RMII RCLK for each of the two > MACs. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> > --- > include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > index f43738607d77..64e245fb113f 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ > #define ASPEED_CLK_BCLK 33 > #define ASPEED_CLK_MPLL 34 > #define ASPEED_CLK_24M 35 > +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC1RCLK 36 > +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC2RCLK 37 Calling these ASPEED_CLK_GATE breaks the pattern the rest of the driver has in using that name for the clocks that are registered as struct aspeed_clk_gate clocks. Do you think we should drop the GATE_ to match the existing clocks? > > #define ASPEED_RESET_XDMA 0 > #define ASPEED_RESET_MCTP 1 > -- > 2.20.1 >
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, at 23:07, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 11:34, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote: > > > > The AST2500 has an explicit gate for the RMII RCLK for each of the two > > MACs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> > > --- > > include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > > index f43738607d77..64e245fb113f 100644 > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h > > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ > > #define ASPEED_CLK_BCLK 33 > > #define ASPEED_CLK_MPLL 34 > > #define ASPEED_CLK_24M 35 > > +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC1RCLK 36 > > +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC2RCLK 37 > > Calling these ASPEED_CLK_GATE breaks the pattern the rest of the > driver has in using that name for the clocks that are registered as > struct aspeed_clk_gate clocks. > > Do you think we should drop the GATE_ to match the existing clocks? I named them that way because the bits in question do just gate the clocks, but I've renamed them to keep the pattern. Will send a v2. Andrew
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h index f43738607d77..64e245fb113f 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ #define ASPEED_CLK_BCLK 33 #define ASPEED_CLK_MPLL 34 #define ASPEED_CLK_24M 35 +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC1RCLK 36 +#define ASPEED_CLK_GATE_MAC2RCLK 37 #define ASPEED_RESET_XDMA 0 #define ASPEED_RESET_MCTP 1
The AST2500 has an explicit gate for the RMII RCLK for each of the two MACs. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> --- include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)