| Message ID | 1569493537-7612-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | power: reset: at91-poweroff: lookup for proper PMC DT node | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:25:37PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Driver has been enabled also for SAM9X60. At the moment the patch which did > this has been sent to mainline the PMC for SAM9X60 wasn't integrated. > SAM9X60 has a new PMC compatible (see commit 01e2113de9a5 > ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 pmc driver")). Do to this we have to > look for proper PMC compatible here, in SHDWC driver. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> > --- Thanks, queued. -- Sebastian > drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c > index e341cc5c0ea6..1c18f465a245 100644 > --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c > +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c > @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_shdwc_of_match[] = { > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_shdwc_of_match); > > +static const struct of_device_id at91_pmc_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" }, > + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmc" }, > + { /* Sentinel. */ } > +}; > + > static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct resource *res; > @@ -313,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > at91_shdwc_dt_configure(pdev); > > - np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-pmc"); > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, at91_pmc_ids); > if (!np) { > ret = -ENODEV; > goto clk_disable; > -- > 2.7.4 >
diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c index e341cc5c0ea6..1c18f465a245 100644 --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_shdwc_of_match[] = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_shdwc_of_match); +static const struct of_device_id at91_pmc_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc" }, + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmc" }, + { /* Sentinel. */ } +}; + static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct resource *res; @@ -313,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init at91_shdwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) at91_shdwc_dt_configure(pdev); - np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-pmc"); + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, at91_pmc_ids); if (!np) { ret = -ENODEV; goto clk_disable;
Driver has been enabled also for SAM9X60. At the moment the patch which did this has been sent to mainline the PMC for SAM9X60 wasn't integrated. SAM9X60 has a new PMC compatible (see commit 01e2113de9a5 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 pmc driver")). Do to this we have to look for proper PMC compatible here, in SHDWC driver. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> --- drivers/power/reset/at91-sama5d2_shdwc.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)