diff mbox series

clk: imx: pll14xx: initialize flags to 0

Message ID 1572938372-7006-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series clk: imx: pll14xx: initialize flags to 0 | expand

Commit Message

Peng Fan Nov. 5, 2019, 7:21 a.m. UTC 
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure, so flags
might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Marc Gonzalez Nov. 5, 2019, 9:47 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 05/11/2019 08:21, Peng Fan wrote:

> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
> imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure, so flags
> might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.

This is incorrect. When using an initializer list, struct members
not explicitly specified are initialized to 0.

https://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.7.9p19

> The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each
> initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any
> previously listed initializer for the same subobject; all
> subobjects that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized
> implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration.
(You might point out that the kernel is compiled with -std=gnu89 not C11,
but GCC's semantics are the same.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Designated-Inits.html#Designated-Inits

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
>  	.type = PLL_1443X,
>  	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
>  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
> +	.flags = 0,
>  };

What tree is this patch based on?

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4-rc1/source/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c#L65

Regards.
Peng Fan Nov. 5, 2019, 10:04 a.m. UTC | #2 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: pll14xx: initialize flags to 0
> 
> On 05/11/2019 08:21, Peng Fan wrote:
> 
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
> > imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure, so flags
> > might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.
> 
> This is incorrect. When using an initializer list, struct members not explicitly
> specified are initialized to 0.
> 
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https:%2F%2Fport70.net
> %2F~nsz%2Fc%2Fc11%2Fn1570.html%236.7.9p19&amp;data=02%7C01%7C
> peng.fan%40nxp.com%7Ca94356700d9c4f61614a08d761d53936%7C686ea1
> d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637085440717516996&amp;s
> data=cUQmXzdbaK6oZqWtJc3Vnh0FJBD1v1b%2FJqb4lRPis5w%3D&amp;rese
> rved=0
> 
> > The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each
> > initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any
> > previously listed initializer for the same subobject; all subobjects
> > that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized implicitly
> > the same as objects that have static storage duration.
> (You might point out that the kernel is compiled with -std=gnu89 not C11, but
> GCC's semantics are the same.)
> 
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gn
> u.org%2Fonlinedocs%2Fgcc%2FDesignated-Inits.html%23Designated-Inits&a
> mp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Ca94356700d9c4f61614a08d
> 761d53936%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637085
> 440717516996&amp;sdata=nsiLE%2B91lfZ15zJtvg8D8nJbIpKJkPyaoKBtmMoa
> AwQ%3D&amp;reserved=0

Thanks for the info.

My understanding is wrong.
The patch was initially try to address what [1] did.
In [1], static was discarded and moved to a common place.
So I thought flags should be initialized as 0.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
> >  	.type = PLL_1443X,
> >  	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
> >  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
> > +	.flags = 0,
> >  };
> 
> What tree is this patch based on?

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/log/?h=for-next

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=43cdaa1567ad3931fbde438853947d45238cc040

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.b
> ootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.4-rc1%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Fclk%2Fimx%2Fclk-p
> ll14xx.c%23L65&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Ca9435670
> 0d9c4f61614a08d761d53936%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C
> 0%7C1%7C637085440717516996&amp;sdata=fPeaCJQKsdWZKVG431KNL8v
> hqT0y2TUMMntf1C66YNg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Regards.
Marc Gonzalez Nov. 5, 2019, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #3 
On 05/11/2019 11:04, Peng Fan wrote:

> The patch was initially try to address what [1] did.
> In [1], static was discarded and moved to a common place.
> So I thought flags should be initialized as 0.

A small additional (pedantic) note :-)

Actually, in your case, imx_1443x_pll has "static storage duration".

The "static" keyword ("storage-class specifier") merely limits the
symbol's visibility outside a compilation unit.

Basically, static => "static storage duration"
But the reverse is not true, see 6.2.4p3

https://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.2.4
6.2.4 Storage durations of objects

Regards.
Abel Vesa Nov. 5, 2019, 11:39 a.m. UTC | #4 
On 19-11-05 07:21:08, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
> imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure, so flags
> might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>

> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
>  	.type = PLL_1443X,
>  	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
>  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
> +	.flags = 0,
>  };
>  
>  struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1416x_pll = {
>  	.type = PLL_1416X,
>  	.rate_table = imx_pll1416x_tbl,
>  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1416x_tbl),
> +	.flags = 0,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *imx_get_pll_settings(
> -- 
> 2.16.4
>
Ahmad Fatoum Nov. 5, 2019, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hello Peng,

On 11/5/19 8:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
> imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure,

They don't have a static in front of them, but they still have static
storage duration.

> so flags
> might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.

I fail to see how. Members not listed in the { initializer-list } are
implicitly initialized as if they were static objects, so flags should
already be zero.

(I assumed this patch is based on Shawn's imx-clk-5.5 tag)                                     

Cheers
Ahmad


> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
>  	.type = PLL_1443X,
>  	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
>  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
> +	.flags = 0,
>  };
>  
>  struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1416x_pll = {
>  	.type = PLL_1416X,
>  	.rate_table = imx_pll1416x_tbl,
>  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1416x_tbl),
> +	.flags = 0,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *imx_get_pll_settings(
>
Peng Fan Nov. 6, 2019, 1:18 a.m. UTC | #6 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: pll14xx: initialize flags to 0
> 
> Hello Peng,
> 
> On 11/5/19 8:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > init.flags is initialized with value from pll_clk->flags, however
> > imx_1443x_pll and imx_1416x_pll are not static structure,
> 
> They don't have a static in front of them, but they still have static storage
> duration.

Yes. I am wrong.

> 
> > so flags
> > might be random value. So let's initialize flags as 0 now.
> 
> I fail to see how. Members not listed in the { initializer-list } are implicitly
> initialized as if they were static objects, so flags should already be zero.

Understand.

> 
> (I assumed this patch is based on Shawn's imx-clk-5.5 tag)

Yes.

Drop this patch.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Cheers
> Ahmad
> 
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> > @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
> >  	.type = PLL_1443X,
> >  	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
> >  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
> > +	.flags = 0,
> >  };
> >
> >  struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1416x_pll = {
> >  	.type = PLL_1416X,
> >  	.rate_table = imx_pll1416x_tbl,
> >  	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1416x_tbl),
> > +	.flags = 0,
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *imx_get_pll_settings(
> >
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
> engutronix.de%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cd19f6f7
> 6f49e40ed516108d761eff88d%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C
> 0%7C1%7C637085555604797300&amp;sdata=MVUvIPUFpkhLj6KDs1Za2sBU
> FNPMrWvS9vA9BuxqQ3k%3D&amp;reserved=0  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
> |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:
> +49-5121-206917-5555 |
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
index fa76e04251c4..a7f1c1abe664 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
@@ -65,12 +65,14 @@  struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1443x_pll = {
 	.type = PLL_1443X,
 	.rate_table = imx_pll1443x_tbl,
 	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1443x_tbl),
+	.flags = 0,
 };
 
 struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx_1416x_pll = {
 	.type = PLL_1416X,
 	.rate_table = imx_pll1416x_tbl,
 	.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_pll1416x_tbl),
+	.flags = 0,
 };
 
 static const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *imx_get_pll_settings(