mbox series

[0/4] i2c: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request

Message ID 20191113092235.30440-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series i2c: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request | expand

Message

Peter Ujfalusi Nov. 13, 2019, 9:22 a.m. UTC 
Hi,

I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
is just:
#define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
	dma_request_chan(dev, name)

Regards,
Peter
---
Peter Ujfalusi (4):
  i2c: at91: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
  i2c: qup: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
  i2c: sh_mobile: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
  i2c: tegra: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c         | 4 ++--
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c       | 4 ++--
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Vinod Koul Nov. 14, 2019, 4:34 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 13-11-19, 11:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
> is just:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> 	dma_request_chan(dev, name)

Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Wolfram Sang Nov. 14, 2019, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:22:31AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
> is just:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> 	dma_request_chan(dev, name)
> 
> Regards,
> Peter

Applied to for-next, thanks!