Message ID | cover.1573750525.git.gayatri.kammela@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | x86/intel_pmc_core: Add Tiger Lake, Elkhart Lake | expand |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:02 PM Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Patch 1: Fix SoC naming inconsistency > Patch 2: Cleans up termination lines > Patch 3: Refactor driver for ease of adding new SoCs > Patch 4: Add debugfs entry for PCH IPs only if platform supports > Patch 5: Add Tiger Lake legacy support to pmc_core > Patch 6: Add Elkhart Lake legacy support to pmc_core > patch 7: Add Comet Lake legacy support to pmc_core > > All the information regarding the PCH IPs and names of IPs will be > available in Intel's Platform Controller Hub (PCH) External Design > Specification (EDS) document expected to be released in 2020 before > product launch. Thanks, though you forgot to fix all prefixes in the mails. We have platform/x86: $DRIVER_NAME: ... Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). > > Changes since v1: > 1) Added a patch that fixes the naming inconsistency. > 2) Fixed the prefix of all the patches. > > Changes since v2: > 1) Add Comet Lake legacy support to pmc_core up on Dell's request > > Gayatri Kammela (7): > x86/intel_pmc_core: Fix the SoC naming inconsistency > x86/intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma after the termination line > x86/intel_pmc_core: Create platform dependent pmc bitmap structs > x86/intel_pmc_core: Make debugfs entry for pch_ip_power_gating_status > conditional > platform/x86: Add Tiger Lake (TGL) platform support to intel_pmc_core > driver > platform/x86: Add Atom based Elkhart Lake (EHL) platform support to > intel_pmc_core driver > platform/x86: Add Comet Lake (CML) platform support to intel_pmc_core > driver > > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> > Cc: David E. Box <david.e.box@intel.com> > Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com> > Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > > -- > 2.17.1 >
> > All the information regarding the PCH IPs and names of IPs will be > > available in Intel's Platform Controller Hub (PCH) External Design > > Specification (EDS) document expected to be released in 2020 before > > product launch. > > Thanks, though you forgot to fix all prefixes in the mails. We have > platform/x86: $DRIVER_NAME: ... > Hi Andy! Sorry I think I misunderstood your comment last time. Just to make sure, the prefix should the pattern in this case "platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: " and should be same for all the patches in the series right? > Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). Sorry about that. I am planning on sending it a single patch excluding it from the series since we received a request from Dell. Please let me know if you think this patch should be included in the series.
> -----Original Message----- > From: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org <platform-driver-x86- > owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Kammela, Gayatri > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 12:11 PM > To: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: Platform Driver; Somayaji, Vishwanath; Darren Hart; Linux Kernel Mailing > List; Prestopine, Charles D; Peter Zijlstra; Pandruvada, Srinivas; Andy > Shevchenko; Liang, Kan; Box, David E; Bhardwaj, Rajneesh; Luck, Tony > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/7] x86/intel_pmc_core: Add Tiger Lake, Elkhart Lake > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > > > All the information regarding the PCH IPs and names of IPs will be > > > available in Intel's Platform Controller Hub (PCH) External Design > > > Specification (EDS) document expected to be released in 2020 before > > > product launch. > > > > Thanks, though you forgot to fix all prefixes in the mails. We have > > platform/x86: $DRIVER_NAME: ... > > > Hi Andy! Sorry I think I misunderstood your comment last time. Just to make > sure, the prefix should the pattern in this case > "platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: " and should be same for all the patches in the > series right? > > > Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). > Sorry about that. I am planning on sending it a single patch excluding it from the > series since we received a request from Dell. Please let me know if you think this > patch should be included in the series. Just to make it clear to those on the list - the request from Dell was off list and separately from my comment in adjusting the ordering. A convenient side effect is that it will take into consideration my comment too :)
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 06:11:16PM +0000, Kammela, Gayatri wrote: > > > All the information regarding the PCH IPs and names of IPs will be > > > available in Intel's Platform Controller Hub (PCH) External Design > > > Specification (EDS) document expected to be released in 2020 before > > > product launch. > > > > Thanks, though you forgot to fix all prefixes in the mails. We have > > platform/x86: $DRIVER_NAME: ... > > > Hi Andy! Sorry I think I misunderstood your comment last time. Just to make sure, the prefix should the pattern in this case > "platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: " and should be same for all the patches in the series right? I didn't deeply check myself, but sounds right. > > Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). > Sorry about that. I am planning on sending it a single patch excluding it from the series since we received a request from Dell. Please let me know if you think this patch should be included in the series. I think we keep good relationship with Dell.
> > > > > Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). > > Sorry about that. I am planning on sending it a single patch excluding > > it from the series since we received a request from Dell. Please let > > me know if you think this patch should be included in the series. > > Just to make it clear to those on the list - the request from Dell was off list > and separately from my comment in adjusting the ordering. A convenient > side effect is that it will take into consideration my comment too :) I have just sent v1 of Comet Lake patch in a new series. Thanks Mario!
> > Hi Andy! Sorry I think I misunderstood your comment last time. Just to > > make sure, the prefix should the pattern in this case > > "platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: " and should be same for all the patches in > the series right? > > I didn't deeply check myself, but sounds right. Thanks for confirming! > > > > Also consider Mario's comment (I didn't hear back from you on it). > > Sorry about that. I am planning on sending it a single patch excluding it from > the series since we received a request from Dell. Please let me know if you > think this patch should be included in the series. > > I think we keep good relationship with Dell. Yeah