diff mbox series

[1/3] s390x: Properly fetch and test the short psw on diag308 subc 0/1

Message ID 20191129142025.21453-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series s390x: Increase architectural compliance | expand

Commit Message

Janosch Frank Nov. 29, 2019, 2:20 p.m. UTC 
We need to actually fetch the cpu mask and set it. As we invert the
short psw indication in the mask, SIE will report a specification
exception, if it wasn't present in the reset psw.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 target/s390x/cpu.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Cornelia Huck Dec. 2, 2019, 9:13 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:20:23 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> We need to actually fetch the cpu mask and set it. As we invert the
> short psw indication in the mask, SIE will report a specification
> exception, if it wasn't present in the reset psw.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  target/s390x/cpu.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks, applied.
Cornelia Huck Dec. 18, 2019, 4:55 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:20:23 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> We need to actually fetch the cpu mask and set it. As we invert the
> short psw indication in the mask, SIE will report a specification
> exception, if it wasn't present in the reset psw.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  target/s390x/cpu.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks, requeued.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index bd39cb54b7..829ce6ad54 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -76,8 +76,16 @@  static bool s390_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
 static void s390_cpu_load_normal(CPUState *s)
 {
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(s);
-    cpu->env.psw.addr = ldl_phys(s->as, 4) & PSW_MASK_ESA_ADDR;
-    cpu->env.psw.mask = PSW_MASK_32 | PSW_MASK_64;
+    uint64_t spsw = ldq_phys(s->as, 0);
+
+    cpu->env.psw.mask = spsw & 0xffffffff80000000ULL;
+    /*
+     * Invert short psw indication, so SIE will report a specification
+     * exception if it was not set.
+     */
+    cpu->env.psw.mask ^= PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW;
+    cpu->env.psw.addr = spsw & 0x7fffffffULL;
+
     s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index d2af13b345..d5e18b096e 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_s390_cpu;
 #define PSW_MASK_EXT            0x0100000000000000ULL
 #define PSW_MASK_KEY            0x00F0000000000000ULL
 #define PSW_SHIFT_KEY           52
+#define PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW       0x0008000000000000ULL
 #define PSW_MASK_MCHECK         0x0004000000000000ULL
 #define PSW_MASK_WAIT           0x0002000000000000ULL
 #define PSW_MASK_PSTATE         0x0001000000000000ULL