Message ID | 20191229183341.14877-8-liuwe@microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | More Hyper-V infrastructure | expand |
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 18:35, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org> wrote: > > This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific > vcpu(s). > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@microsoft.com> > --- > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > index 67667936e9..da3a8cd85d 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info __read_mostly ms_hyperv; > void *hv_hypercall; > static struct page_info *hv_hypercall_page; > DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct hyperv_pcpu_page, hv_pcpu_input_arg); > +DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); > > static const struct hypervisor_ops ops; > const struct hypervisor_ops *__init hyperv_probe(void) > @@ -115,15 +116,26 @@ static void setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(void) > this_cpu(hv_pcpu_input_arg).mapping = mapping; > } > > +static void setup_vp_index(void) > +{ > + uint64_t vp_index_msr; > + > + rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX, vp_index_msr); > + > + this_cpu(hv_vp_index) = vp_index_msr; > +} Is it worth a separate function vs. bundling this into setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg()? Paul > + > static void __init setup(void) > { > setup_hypercall_page(); > setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(); > + setup_vp_index(); > } > > static void ap_setup(void) > { > setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(); > + setup_vp_index(); > } > > static const struct hypervisor_ops ops = { > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h > index 83f297468f..4b635829f3 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct hyperv_pcpu_page { > void *mapping; > }; > DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hyperv_pcpu_page, hv_pcpu_input_arg); > +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); > > const struct hypervisor_ops *hyperv_probe(void); > > -- > 2.20.1 >
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:11:39AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 18:35, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org> wrote: > > > > This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific > > vcpu(s). > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@microsoft.com> > > --- > > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > > index 67667936e9..da3a8cd85d 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info __read_mostly ms_hyperv; > > void *hv_hypercall; > > static struct page_info *hv_hypercall_page; > > DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct hyperv_pcpu_page, hv_pcpu_input_arg); > > +DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); > > > > static const struct hypervisor_ops ops; > > const struct hypervisor_ops *__init hyperv_probe(void) > > @@ -115,15 +116,26 @@ static void setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(void) > > this_cpu(hv_pcpu_input_arg).mapping = mapping; > > } > > > > +static void setup_vp_index(void) > > +{ > > + uint64_t vp_index_msr; > > + > > + rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX, vp_index_msr); > > + > > + this_cpu(hv_vp_index) = vp_index_msr; > > +} > > Is it worth a separate function vs. bundling this into > setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg()? My thinking is this may be called in the resume path; while setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg doesn't (because they just set aside a bunch of guest pages). That is just a precaution. I haven't found any text in TLFS that vp index will / can change after resume. This function can certainly be folded into the other if that's preferred. Wei.
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c index 67667936e9..da3a8cd85d 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info __read_mostly ms_hyperv; void *hv_hypercall; static struct page_info *hv_hypercall_page; DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct hyperv_pcpu_page, hv_pcpu_input_arg); +DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); static const struct hypervisor_ops ops; const struct hypervisor_ops *__init hyperv_probe(void) @@ -115,15 +116,26 @@ static void setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(void) this_cpu(hv_pcpu_input_arg).mapping = mapping; } +static void setup_vp_index(void) +{ + uint64_t vp_index_msr; + + rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX, vp_index_msr); + + this_cpu(hv_vp_index) = vp_index_msr; +} + static void __init setup(void) { setup_hypercall_page(); setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(); + setup_vp_index(); } static void ap_setup(void) { setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(); + setup_vp_index(); } static const struct hypervisor_ops ops = { diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h index 83f297468f..4b635829f3 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct hyperv_pcpu_page { void *mapping; }; DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hyperv_pcpu_page, hv_pcpu_input_arg); +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); const struct hypervisor_ops *hyperv_probe(void);
This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific vcpu(s). Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@microsoft.com> --- xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c | 12 ++++++++++++ xen/include/asm-x86/guest/hyperv.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)