Message ID | 20191204155938.2279686-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation | expand |
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:59:13AM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > Many changes compared to version 6, so I decided to send it out now. > James Morse raised an important issue to which I do not have a solution > yet. But would like to discuss it. Thanks. In the meantime, I've queued the first 10 patches of the series since they look like sensible cleanup, they've been reviewed and it saves you from having to repost them when you make changes to the later stuff. Will
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:32 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:59:13AM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > Many changes compared to version 6, so I decided to send it out now. > > James Morse raised an important issue to which I do not have a solution > > yet. But would like to discuss it. > > Thanks. In the meantime, I've queued the first 10 patches of the series > since they look like sensible cleanup, they've been reviewed and it saves > you from having to repost them when you make changes to the later stuff. Great, thank you! Pasha
Hi Pavel, On 08/01/2020 17:59, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:32 PM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:59:13AM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote: >>> Many changes compared to version 6, so I decided to send it out now. >>> James Morse raised an important issue to which I do not have a solution >>> yet. But would like to discuss it. (Christmas was badly timed relative to my holiday, so its taken a while for me to catch up) The memory out of range of the idmap? I've posted an RFC here[0] that makes hibernate idmap is ttbr0 page. This should let you reuse that code and test it without a machine with a funny memory layout. Thanks, James [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200115143322.214247-1-james.morse@arm.com/