Message ID | 20200117165330.17015-3-daniel.diaz@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS | expand |
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:55 AM Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> wrote: > > During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and > LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading > to defaults which were not necessarily correct. > > OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem: > ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS? > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> > --- Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile > index e2fd6f8d579c..f1740113d5dc 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ $(notdir $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) \ > $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS)): %: $(OUTPUT)/% ; > > $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read: urandom_read.c > - $(CC) -o $@ $< -Wl,--build-id > + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $< $(LDLIBS) -Wl,--build-id > > $(OUTPUT)/test_stub.o: test_stub.c > $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $< > -- > 2.20.1 >
Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:55 AM Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and > > LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading > > to defaults which were not necessarily correct. > > > > OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem: > > ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS? > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> > > --- > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
On 1/17/20 5:53 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote: > During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and > LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading > to defaults which were not necessarily correct. > > OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem: > ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS? > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index e2fd6f8d579c..f1740113d5dc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ $(notdir $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) \ $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS)): %: $(OUTPUT)/% ; $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read: urandom_read.c - $(CC) -o $@ $< -Wl,--build-id + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $< $(LDLIBS) -Wl,--build-id $(OUTPUT)/test_stub.o: test_stub.c $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading to defaults which were not necessarily correct. OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem: ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS? Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)