Message ID | 157952560001.1683545.16757917515390545122.stgit@toke.dk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | tools: Use consistent libbpf include paths everywhere | expand |
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:08 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote: > > We are currently being somewhat inconsistent with the libbpf include paths, > which makes it difficult to move files from the kernel into an external > libbpf-using project without adjusting include paths. > > Having the bpf/ subdir of $INCLUDEDIR in the include path has never been a > requirement for building against libbpf before, and indeed the libbpf pkg-config > file doesn't include it. So let's make all libbpf includes across the kernel > tree use the bpf/ prefix in their includes. Since bpftool skeleton generation > emits code with a libbpf include, this also ensures that those can be used in > existing external projects using the regular pkg-config include path. > > This turns out to be a somewhat invasive change in the number of files touched; > however, the actual changes to files are fairly trivial (most of them are simply > made with 'sed'). The series is split to make the change for one tool subdir at > a time, while trying not to break the build along the way. It is structured like > this: > > - Patch 1-3: Trivial fixes to Makefiles for issues I discovered while changing > the include paths. > > - Patch 4-8: Change the include directives to use the bpf/ prefix, and updates > Makefiles to make sure tools/lib/ is part of the include path, but without > removing tools/lib/bpf > > - Patch 9-11: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include paths to make sure we don't > inadvertently re-introduce includes without the bpf/ prefix. > > Changelog: > > v5: > - Combine the libbpf build rules in selftests Makefile (using Andrii's > suggestion for a make rule). > - Re-use self-tests libbpf build for runqslower (new patch 10) > - Formatting fixes > > v4: > - Move runqslower error on missing BTF into make rule > - Make sure we don't always force a rebuild selftests > - Rebase on latest bpf-next (dropping patch 11) > > v3: > - Don't add the kernel build dir to the runqslower Makefile, pass it in from > selftests instead. > - Use libbpf's 'make install_headers' in selftests instead of trying to > generate bpf_helper_defs.h in-place (to also work on read-only filesystems). > - Use a scratch builddir for both libbpf and bpftool when building in selftests. > - Revert bpf_helpers.h to quoted include instead of angled include with a bpf/ > prefix. > - Fix a few style nits from Andrii > > v2: > - Do a full cleanup of libbpf includes instead of just changing the > bpf_helper_defs.h include. > > --- > Looks good, it's a clear improvement on what we had before, thanks! It doesn't re-build bpftool when bpftool sources changes, but I think it was like that even before, so no need to block on that. Would be nice to have a follow up fixing that, though. $(wildcard $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/*.[ch] $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/Makefile) should do it, same as for libbpf. So, for the series: Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (11): > samples/bpf: Don't try to remove user's homedir on clean > tools/bpf/runqslower: Fix override option for VMLINUX_BTF > selftests: Pass VMLINUX_BTF to runqslower Makefile > tools/runqslower: Use consistent include paths for libbpf > selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf > bpftool: Use consistent include paths for libbpf > perf: Use consistent include paths for libbpf > samples/bpf: Use consistent include paths for libbpf > tools/runqslower: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include path > runsqslower: Support user-specified libbpf include and object paths > selftests: Refactor build to remove tools/lib/bpf from include path > > [...]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 2:21 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:08 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > We are currently being somewhat inconsistent with the libbpf include paths, > > which makes it difficult to move files from the kernel into an external > > libbpf-using project without adjusting include paths. > > > > Having the bpf/ subdir of $INCLUDEDIR in the include path has never been a > > requirement for building against libbpf before, and indeed the libbpf pkg-config > > file doesn't include it. So let's make all libbpf includes across the kernel > > tree use the bpf/ prefix in their includes. Since bpftool skeleton generation > > emits code with a libbpf include, this also ensures that those can be used in > > existing external projects using the regular pkg-config include path. > > > > This turns out to be a somewhat invasive change in the number of files touched; > > however, the actual changes to files are fairly trivial (most of them are simply > > made with 'sed'). The series is split to make the change for one tool subdir at > > a time, while trying not to break the build along the way. It is structured like > > this: > > > > - Patch 1-3: Trivial fixes to Makefiles for issues I discovered while changing > > the include paths. > > > > - Patch 4-8: Change the include directives to use the bpf/ prefix, and updates > > Makefiles to make sure tools/lib/ is part of the include path, but without > > removing tools/lib/bpf > > > > - Patch 9-11: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include paths to make sure we don't > > inadvertently re-introduce includes without the bpf/ prefix. > > > > Changelog: > > > > v5: > > - Combine the libbpf build rules in selftests Makefile (using Andrii's > > suggestion for a make rule). > > - Re-use self-tests libbpf build for runqslower (new patch 10) > > - Formatting fixes > > > > v4: > > - Move runqslower error on missing BTF into make rule > > - Make sure we don't always force a rebuild selftests > > - Rebase on latest bpf-next (dropping patch 11) > > > > v3: > > - Don't add the kernel build dir to the runqslower Makefile, pass it in from > > selftests instead. > > - Use libbpf's 'make install_headers' in selftests instead of trying to > > generate bpf_helper_defs.h in-place (to also work on read-only filesystems). > > - Use a scratch builddir for both libbpf and bpftool when building in selftests. > > - Revert bpf_helpers.h to quoted include instead of angled include with a bpf/ > > prefix. > > - Fix a few style nits from Andrii > > > > v2: > > - Do a full cleanup of libbpf includes instead of just changing the > > bpf_helper_defs.h include. > > > > --- > > > > Looks good, it's a clear improvement on what we had before, thanks! > > It doesn't re-build bpftool when bpftool sources changes, but I think > it was like that even before, so no need to block on that. Would be > nice to have a follow up fixing that, though. $(wildcard > $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/*.[ch] $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/Makefile) should do it, same as > for libbpf. > > So, for the series: > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> > Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Applied. Thanks
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:08 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> We are currently being somewhat inconsistent with the libbpf include paths, >> which makes it difficult to move files from the kernel into an external >> libbpf-using project without adjusting include paths. >> >> Having the bpf/ subdir of $INCLUDEDIR in the include path has never been a >> requirement for building against libbpf before, and indeed the libbpf pkg-config >> file doesn't include it. So let's make all libbpf includes across the kernel >> tree use the bpf/ prefix in their includes. Since bpftool skeleton generation >> emits code with a libbpf include, this also ensures that those can be used in >> existing external projects using the regular pkg-config include path. >> >> This turns out to be a somewhat invasive change in the number of files touched; >> however, the actual changes to files are fairly trivial (most of them are simply >> made with 'sed'). The series is split to make the change for one tool subdir at >> a time, while trying not to break the build along the way. It is structured like >> this: >> >> - Patch 1-3: Trivial fixes to Makefiles for issues I discovered while changing >> the include paths. >> >> - Patch 4-8: Change the include directives to use the bpf/ prefix, and updates >> Makefiles to make sure tools/lib/ is part of the include path, but without >> removing tools/lib/bpf >> >> - Patch 9-11: Remove tools/lib/bpf from include paths to make sure we don't >> inadvertently re-introduce includes without the bpf/ prefix. >> >> Changelog: >> >> v5: >> - Combine the libbpf build rules in selftests Makefile (using Andrii's >> suggestion for a make rule). >> - Re-use self-tests libbpf build for runqslower (new patch 10) >> - Formatting fixes >> >> v4: >> - Move runqslower error on missing BTF into make rule >> - Make sure we don't always force a rebuild selftests >> - Rebase on latest bpf-next (dropping patch 11) >> >> v3: >> - Don't add the kernel build dir to the runqslower Makefile, pass it in from >> selftests instead. >> - Use libbpf's 'make install_headers' in selftests instead of trying to >> generate bpf_helper_defs.h in-place (to also work on read-only filesystems). >> - Use a scratch builddir for both libbpf and bpftool when building in selftests. >> - Revert bpf_helpers.h to quoted include instead of angled include with a bpf/ >> prefix. >> - Fix a few style nits from Andrii >> >> v2: >> - Do a full cleanup of libbpf includes instead of just changing the >> bpf_helper_defs.h include. >> >> --- >> > > Looks good, it's a clear improvement on what we had before, thanks! > > It doesn't re-build bpftool when bpftool sources changes, but I think > it was like that even before, so no need to block on that. Would be > nice to have a follow up fixing that, though. $(wildcard > $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/*.[ch] $(BPFTOOL_DIR)/Makefile) should do it, same as > for libbpf. Yeah, I did realise there was some potential for improvement for bpftool as well, but I got enough of Makefiles for now :) I'll see if I can't circle back to this at some point... > So, for the series: > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> > Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Thanks! -Toke