Message ID | 20200121134510.3893487-1-heiko@sntech.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: dts: rockchip: fix px30 lvds ports | expand |
Hi Heiko, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote on Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:45:10 +0100: > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> > > The lvds controller has two ports. port@0 for the connection > to the display controller(s) and port@1 for the connection to > the panel, so should have a ports node covering the port@x nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > index 9b1c92132007..37e014444214 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > @@ -421,19 +421,24 @@ lvds: lvds { > rockchip,output = "lvds"; > status = "disabled"; > > - port@0 { > - reg = <0>; > + ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > > - lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { > + port@0 { > reg = <0>; > - remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; > - }; > - > - lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { > - reg = <1>; > - remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { > + reg = <0>; > + remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; > + }; > + > + lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { > + reg = <1>; > + remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; > + }; > }; > }; > }; I don't know the exact rule but this seems cleaner indeed. Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Thanks, Miquèl
On 21/01/2020 1:45 pm, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> > > The lvds controller has two ports. port@0 for the connection > to the display controller(s) and port@1 for the connection to > the panel, so should have a ports node covering the port@x nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > index 9b1c92132007..37e014444214 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi > @@ -421,19 +421,24 @@ lvds: lvds { > rockchip,output = "lvds"; > status = "disabled"; FWIW, the main node's "#{address,size}-cells" properties above here should now be unnecessary too. Robin. > > - port@0 { > - reg = <0>; > + ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > > - lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { > + port@0 { > reg = <0>; > - remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; > - }; > - > - lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { > - reg = <1>; > - remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { > + reg = <0>; > + remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; > + }; > + > + lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { > + reg = <1>; > + remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; > + }; > }; > }; > }; >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi index 9b1c92132007..37e014444214 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi @@ -421,19 +421,24 @@ lvds: lvds { rockchip,output = "lvds"; status = "disabled"; - port@0 { - reg = <0>; + ports { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { + port@0 { reg = <0>; - remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; - }; - - lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { - reg = <1>; - remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + lvds_vopb_in: endpoint@0 { + reg = <0>; + remote-endpoint = <&vopb_out_lvds>; + }; + + lvds_vopl_in: endpoint@1 { + reg = <1>; + remote-endpoint = <&vopl_out_lvds>; + }; }; }; };