| Message ID | 157982505923.2765631.10587375380960098225.stgit@magnolia (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | xfs_repair: do not trash valid root dirs | expand |
On 1/23/20 6:17 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > xfs_repair has a very old check that evidently excuses the AG 0 inode > btrees pointing to blocks that are already marked XR_E_INUSE_FS* (e.g. > AG headers). mkfs never formats filesystems that way and it looks like > an error, so purge the check. After this, we always complain if inodes > overlap with AG headers because that should never happen. I peered back into the mists of time to see if I could find any reason for this exception, and I couldn't. Only question is why you removed the - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); assert, that's still a valid assert, no? > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > --- > repair/globals.c | 1 - > repair/globals.h | 1 - > repair/scan.c | 19 ------------------- > repair/xfs_repair.c | 7 ------- > 4 files changed, 28 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/repair/globals.c b/repair/globals.c > index dcd79ea4..8a60e706 100644 > --- a/repair/globals.c > +++ b/repair/globals.c > @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ int lost_gquotino; > int lost_pquotino; > > xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; > -xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; > xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; > xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; > xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; > diff --git a/repair/globals.h b/repair/globals.h > index 008bdd90..2ed5c894 100644 > --- a/repair/globals.h > +++ b/repair/globals.h > @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ extern int lost_gquotino; > extern int lost_pquotino; > > extern xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; > -extern xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; > extern xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; > extern xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; > extern xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; > diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c > index c383f3aa..05707dd2 100644 > --- a/repair/scan.c > +++ b/repair/scan.c > @@ -1645,13 +1645,6 @@ scan_single_ino_chunk( > break; > case XR_E_INUSE_FS: > case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: > - if (agno == 0 && > - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && > - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { > - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); > - break; > - } > - /* fall through */ > default: > /* XXX - maybe should mark block a duplicate */ > do_warn( > @@ -1782,18 +1775,6 @@ _("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\ > break; > case XR_E_INUSE_FS: > case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: > - if (agno == 0 && > - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && > - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { > - do_warn( > -_("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), > - agno, agbno, mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock); > - > - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); > - suspect++; > - break; > - } > - /* fall through */ > default: > do_warn( > _("inode chunk claims used block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), > diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c > index 9295673d..3e9059f3 100644 > --- a/repair/xfs_repair.c > +++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c > @@ -460,13 +460,6 @@ calc_mkfs(xfs_mount_t *mp) > first_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno); > } > > - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); > - > - if (M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 1) > - last_prealloc_ino = first_prealloc_ino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK; > - else > - last_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno + 1); > - > /* > * now the first 3 inodes in the system > */ >
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:38:52PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/23/20 6:17 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > > > xfs_repair has a very old check that evidently excuses the AG 0 inode > > btrees pointing to blocks that are already marked XR_E_INUSE_FS* (e.g. > > AG headers). mkfs never formats filesystems that way and it looks like > > an error, so purge the check. After this, we always complain if inodes > > overlap with AG headers because that should never happen. > > I peered back into the mists of time to see if I could find any reason for > this exception, and I couldn't. > > Only question is why you removed the > > - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); > > assert, that's still a valid assert, no? The superblock validation routines are supposed to reject all the combinations that can result in ialloc_blks being zero. That said, I can't think of a reason to remove the assert. If you want me to put it back, it I can... or pretty-please put it back in for me? :) --D > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > > --- > > repair/globals.c | 1 - > > repair/globals.h | 1 - > > repair/scan.c | 19 ------------------- > > repair/xfs_repair.c | 7 ------- > > 4 files changed, 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/repair/globals.c b/repair/globals.c > > index dcd79ea4..8a60e706 100644 > > --- a/repair/globals.c > > +++ b/repair/globals.c > > @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ int lost_gquotino; > > int lost_pquotino; > > > > xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; > > -xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; > > xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; > > xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; > > xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; > > diff --git a/repair/globals.h b/repair/globals.h > > index 008bdd90..2ed5c894 100644 > > --- a/repair/globals.h > > +++ b/repair/globals.h > > @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ extern int lost_gquotino; > > extern int lost_pquotino; > > > > extern xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; > > -extern xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; > > extern xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; > > extern xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; > > extern xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; > > diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c > > index c383f3aa..05707dd2 100644 > > --- a/repair/scan.c > > +++ b/repair/scan.c > > @@ -1645,13 +1645,6 @@ scan_single_ino_chunk( > > break; > > case XR_E_INUSE_FS: > > case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: > > - if (agno == 0 && > > - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && > > - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { > > - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); > > - break; > > - } > > - /* fall through */ > > default: > > /* XXX - maybe should mark block a duplicate */ > > do_warn( > > @@ -1782,18 +1775,6 @@ _("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\ > > break; > > case XR_E_INUSE_FS: > > case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: > > - if (agno == 0 && > > - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && > > - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { > > - do_warn( > > -_("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), > > - agno, agbno, mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock); > > - > > - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); > > - suspect++; > > - break; > > - } > > - /* fall through */ > > default: > > do_warn( > > _("inode chunk claims used block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), > > diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c > > index 9295673d..3e9059f3 100644 > > --- a/repair/xfs_repair.c > > +++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c > > @@ -460,13 +460,6 @@ calc_mkfs(xfs_mount_t *mp) > > first_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno); > > } > > > > - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); > > - > > - if (M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 1) > > - last_prealloc_ino = first_prealloc_ino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK; > > - else > > - last_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno + 1); > > - > > /* > > * now the first 3 inodes in the system > > */ > >
On 1/30/20 2:26 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:38:52PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 1/23/20 6:17 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >>> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> >>> >>> xfs_repair has a very old check that evidently excuses the AG 0 inode >>> btrees pointing to blocks that are already marked XR_E_INUSE_FS* (e.g. >>> AG headers). mkfs never formats filesystems that way and it looks like >>> an error, so purge the check. After this, we always complain if inodes >>> overlap with AG headers because that should never happen. >> >> I peered back into the mists of time to see if I could find any reason for >> this exception, and I couldn't. >> >> Only question is why you removed the >> >> - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); >> >> assert, that's still a valid assert, no? > > The superblock validation routines are supposed to reject all the > combinations that can result in ialloc_blks being zero. > > That said, I can't think of a reason to remove the assert. If you want > me to put it back, it I can... or pretty-please put it back in for me? > :) Sure, I'll try to remember to do that with your blessing. It just didn't seem related to the rest of the patch, is all. If it's only there to protect the next calculations, and this is a spot that makes no sense to test it, I'm ok with dropping it too. Was just looking for a reason. -Eric
diff --git a/repair/globals.c b/repair/globals.c index dcd79ea4..8a60e706 100644 --- a/repair/globals.c +++ b/repair/globals.c @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ int lost_gquotino; int lost_pquotino; xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; -xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; diff --git a/repair/globals.h b/repair/globals.h index 008bdd90..2ed5c894 100644 --- a/repair/globals.h +++ b/repair/globals.h @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ extern int lost_gquotino; extern int lost_pquotino; extern xfs_agino_t first_prealloc_ino; -extern xfs_agino_t last_prealloc_ino; extern xfs_agblock_t bnobt_root; extern xfs_agblock_t bcntbt_root; extern xfs_agblock_t inobt_root; diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c index c383f3aa..05707dd2 100644 --- a/repair/scan.c +++ b/repair/scan.c @@ -1645,13 +1645,6 @@ scan_single_ino_chunk( break; case XR_E_INUSE_FS: case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: - if (agno == 0 && - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); - break; - } - /* fall through */ default: /* XXX - maybe should mark block a duplicate */ do_warn( @@ -1782,18 +1775,6 @@ _("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\ break; case XR_E_INUSE_FS: case XR_E_INUSE_FS1: - if (agno == 0 && - ino + j >= first_prealloc_ino && - ino + j < last_prealloc_ino) { - do_warn( -_("inode chunk claims untracked block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), - agno, agbno, mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock); - - set_bmap(agno, agbno, XR_E_INO); - suspect++; - break; - } - /* fall through */ default: do_warn( _("inode chunk claims used block, finobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb %d\n"), diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c index 9295673d..3e9059f3 100644 --- a/repair/xfs_repair.c +++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c @@ -460,13 +460,6 @@ calc_mkfs(xfs_mount_t *mp) first_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno); } - ASSERT(M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 0); - - if (M_IGEO(mp)->ialloc_blks > 1) - last_prealloc_ino = first_prealloc_ino + XFS_INODES_PER_CHUNK; - else - last_prealloc_ino = XFS_AGB_TO_AGINO(mp, fino_bno + 1); - /* * now the first 3 inodes in the system */