| Message ID | 20200201152851.82867-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | s390x: smp: Improve smp code and reset checks | expand |
On 01/02/2020 16.28, Janosch Frank wrote: > Instead of "smp: ecall: ecall" we now get "smp: ecall: received". > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> > --- > s390x/smp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c > index e37eb56..93a9594 100644 > --- a/s390x/smp.c > +++ b/s390x/smp.c > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ecall(void) > load_psw_mask(mask); > set_flag(1); > while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); } > - report(1, "ecall"); > + report(1, "received"); > set_flag(1); > } > > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void emcall(void) > load_psw_mask(mask); > set_flag(1); > while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); } > - report(1, "ecall"); > + report(1, "received"); > set_flag(1); > } Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:28:46 -0500 Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Instead of "smp: ecall: ecall" we now get "smp: ecall: received". > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> > --- > s390x/smp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c index e37eb56..93a9594 100644 --- a/s390x/smp.c +++ b/s390x/smp.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ecall(void) load_psw_mask(mask); set_flag(1); while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); } - report(1, "ecall"); + report(1, "received"); set_flag(1); } @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void emcall(void) load_psw_mask(mask); set_flag(1); while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); } - report(1, "ecall"); + report(1, "received"); set_flag(1); }
Instead of "smp: ecall: ecall" we now get "smp: ecall: received". Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> --- s390x/smp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)