mbox series

[V4,0/4] Enable video on sc7180

Message ID 1579006416-11599-1-git-send-email-dikshita@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Enable video on sc7180 | expand

Message

Dikshita Agarwal Jan. 14, 2020, 12:53 p.m. UTC
Hello,

Changes since v3:

  - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.

  - renamed DT schema file.

v3 can be found at [1].
These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].

Thanks,
Dikshita

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/2/267
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=219021
[3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=214797
[4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/73
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=418681
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=424054

Dikshita Agarwal (4):
  arm64: dts: sc7180: Add Venus video codec DT node
  dt-bindings: media: venus: Add sc7180 DT schema
  venus: core: add sc7180 DT compatible and resource struct
  arm64: dts: sc7180: Add Venus firmware subnode

 .../bindings/media/qcom,sc7180-venus.yaml          | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts            |   6 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi               |  36 ++++++
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c           |  45 +++++++
 4 files changed, 231 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7180-venus.yaml

Comments

Bjorn Andersson Feb. 3, 2020, 6:02 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Changes since v3:
> 
>   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> 
>   - renamed DT schema file.
> 
> v3 can be found at [1].
> These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> 
> Thanks,
> Dikshita
> 

Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks

Regards,
Bjorn

> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/2/267
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=219021
> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=214797
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/73
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=418681
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=424054
> 
> Dikshita Agarwal (4):
>   arm64: dts: sc7180: Add Venus video codec DT node
>   dt-bindings: media: venus: Add sc7180 DT schema
>   venus: core: add sc7180 DT compatible and resource struct
>   arm64: dts: sc7180: Add Venus firmware subnode
> 
>  .../bindings/media/qcom,sc7180-venus.yaml          | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts            |   6 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi               |  36 ++++++
>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c           |  45 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 231 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sc7180-venus.yaml
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
Matthias Kaehlcke Feb. 13, 2020, 6:53 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Bjorn,

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Changes since v3:
> > 
> >   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > 
> >   - renamed DT schema file.
> > 
> > v3 can be found at [1].
> > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Dikshita
> > 
> 
> Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks

I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
maybe you forget to push these?

Thanks

Matthias
Bjorn Andersson Feb. 13, 2020, 7:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Changes since v3:
> > > 
> > >   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > > 
> > >   - renamed DT schema file.
> > > 
> > > v3 can be found at [1].
> > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dikshita
> > > 
> > 
> > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks
> 
> I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
> 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
> maybe you forget to push these?
> 

Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I
rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted.

I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the
interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't
compile.

Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/
to get this settled.

Regards,
Bjorn
Matthias Kaehlcke Feb. 13, 2020, 7:34 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > 
> > > >   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > > > 
> > > >   - renamed DT schema file.
> > > > 
> > > > v3 can be found at [1].
> > > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dikshita
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks
> > 
> > I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
> > 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
> > maybe you forget to push these?
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I
> rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted.
> 
> I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the
> interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't
> compile.

Now that you say it, I also stumbled across this at some point ...

> Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/
> to get this settled.

Thanks for the clarification!
Matthias Kaehlcke Feb. 13, 2020, 7:57 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > 
> > > >   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > > > 
> > > >   - renamed DT schema file.
> > > > 
> > > > v3 can be found at [1].
> > > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dikshita
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks
> > 
> > I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
> > 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
> > maybe you forget to push these?
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I
> rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted.
> 
> I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the
> interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't
> compile.
> 
> Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/
> to get this settled.

Hm, there has been no response to the comments in more than a month, also
the series depends on another ('Split SDM845 interconnect nodes and
consolidate RPMh support' https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=238831),
even though that isn't mentioned anywhere.

IIUC the interconnect configuration isn't strictly required to get the
video codec to work. I wonder if it would make sense to respin this
series to remove the interconnect properties. They could be added in a
separate patch after the ICC support has landed.

Dikshita/Bjorn, what do you think?
Bjorn Andersson Feb. 13, 2020, 8:12 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu 13 Feb 11:57 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > > 
> > > > >   - addressed DT and DT schema review comments.
> > > > > 
> > > > >   - renamed DT schema file.
> > > > > 
> > > > > v3 can be found at [1].
> > > > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6].
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Dikshita
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks
> > > 
> > > I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in
> > > 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or
> > > maybe you forget to push these?
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I
> > rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted.
> > 
> > I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the
> > interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't
> > compile.
> > 
> > Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/
> > to get this settled.
> 
> Hm, there has been no response to the comments in more than a month, also
> the series depends on another ('Split SDM845 interconnect nodes and
> consolidate RPMh support' https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=238831),
> even though that isn't mentioned anywhere.
> 

Sibi is revisiting David's 845 series, so my expectation is that it will
land in this cycle.

> IIUC the interconnect configuration isn't strictly required to get the
> video codec to work. I wonder if it would make sense to respin this
> series to remove the interconnect properties. They could be added in a
> separate patch after the ICC support has landed.
> 
> Dikshita/Bjorn, what do you think?

That sounds likely. Dikshita, can you confirm that we can just omit the
interconnect lines from the patch and I'll just apply the patches again
without these (and you can follow up with adding interconnects later).

Regards,
Bjorn