@@ -2194,10 +2194,8 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
* core function of the snapshot creation.
*/
ret = create_pending_snapshots(trans);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_reloc;
/*
* We insert the dir indexes of the snapshots and update the inode
@@ -2210,16 +2208,12 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
* the nodes and leaves.
*/
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_reloc;
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, (unsigned long)-1);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_reloc;
/*
* make sure none of the code above managed to slip in a
@@ -2245,11 +2239,8 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
mutex_lock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
ret = commit_fs_roots(trans);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_tree_log;
/*
* Since the transaction is done, we can apply the pending changes
@@ -2267,29 +2258,20 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
* new delayed refs. Must handle them or qgroup can be wrong.
*/
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, (unsigned long)-1);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_tree_log;
/*
* Since fs roots are all committed, we can get a quite accurate
* new_roots. So let's do quota accounting.
*/
ret = btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(trans);
- if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto unlock_tree_log;
ret = commit_cowonly_roots(trans);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_tree_log;
/*
* The tasks which save the space cache and inode cache may also
@@ -2297,9 +2279,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
*/
if (TRANS_ABORTED(cur_trans)) {
ret = cur_trans->aborted;
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
- goto scrub_continue;
+ goto unlock_tree_log;
}
btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(fs_info);
@@ -2346,6 +2326,10 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
if (ret) {
btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, ret,
"Error while writing out transaction");
+ /*
+ * reloc_mutex has been unlocked, tree_log_mutex is still held
+ * but we can't jump to unlock_tree_log causing double unlock
+ */
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
goto scrub_continue;
}
@@ -2394,6 +2378,10 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
return ret;
+unlock_tree_log:
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->tree_log_mutex);
+unlock_reloc:
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
scrub_continue:
btrfs_scrub_continue(fs_info);
cleanup_transaction:
The tree_log_mutex and reloc_mutex locks are properly nested so we can simplify error handling and add labels for them. This reduces line count of the function. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> --- v2: - fixed label after commit_fs_roots, to point to unlock_tree_log - added comment after btrfs_handle_fs_error and keep the locks as is fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)