Message ID | 878skp97in.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: soc-pcm cleanup step5 | expand |
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 15:40 +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > > dpcm_fe_dai_close() and error case of dpcm_fe_dai_open() > need to do same cleanup operation. > To avoid duplicate code, this patch adds dpcm_fe_dai_clean() > and use it. > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> > --- > sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > index 3686dda097e2..d578dbdfa846 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > @@ -2978,14 +2978,11 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct > snd_soc_card *card) > return ret; > } > > -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) > +static void dpcm_fe_dai_clean(struct snd_pcm_substream > *fe_substream) The series looks good to me, Morimoto-san. But a minor suggestion if you're doing a v2 to address other comments. Could you please change the name of the function above to dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() instead? Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Thanks, Ranjani
Hi Ranjani Thank you for your review > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > index 3686dda097e2..d578dbdfa846 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c > > @@ -2978,14 +2978,11 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct > > snd_soc_card *card) > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) > > +static void dpcm_fe_dai_clean(struct snd_pcm_substream > > *fe_substream) > The series looks good to me, Morimoto-san. But a minor suggestion if > you're doing a v2 to address other comments. Could you please change > the name of the function above to dpcm_fe_dai_cleanup() instead? Yeah, will do. Thanks > Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 3686dda097e2..d578dbdfa846 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -2978,14 +2978,11 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct snd_soc_card *card) return ret; } -static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) +static void dpcm_fe_dai_clean(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; - int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret; - - mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); - ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); + int stream = fe_substream->stream; /* mark FE's links ready to prune */ for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) @@ -2994,6 +2991,18 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; +} + +static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) +{ + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; + int ret; + + mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME); + ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream); + + dpcm_fe_dai_clean(fe_substream); + mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex); return ret; } @@ -3001,7 +3010,6 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) { struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data; - struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm; struct snd_soc_dapm_widget_list *list; int ret; int stream = fe_substream->stream; @@ -3021,14 +3029,8 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream) dpcm_process_paths(fe, stream, &list, 1); ret = dpcm_fe_dai_startup(fe_substream); - if (ret < 0) { - /* clean up all links */ - for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm) - dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE; - - dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); - fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; - } + if (ret < 0) + dpcm_fe_dai_clean(fe_substream); dpcm_clear_pending_state(fe, stream); dpcm_path_put(&list);