Message ID | 20200207103608.110305-1-oupton@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Handle monitor trap flag during instruction emulation | expand |
On 07/02/20 11:36, Oliver Upton wrote: > v1: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113221053.22053-1-oupton@google.com > v2: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200128092715.69429-1-oupton@google.com > > v1 => v2: > - Don't split the #DB delivery by vendors. Unconditionally injecting > #DB payloads into the 'pending debug exceptions' field will cause KVM > to get stuck in a loop. Per the SDM, when hardware injects an event > resulting from this field's value, it is checked against the > exception interception bitmap. > - Address Sean's comments by injecting the VM-exit into L1 from > vmx_check_nested_events(). > - Added fix for nested INIT VM-exits + 'pending debug exceptions' field > as it was noticed in implementing v2. > - Drop Peter + Jim's Reviewed-by tags, as the patch set has changed > since v1. > > v2 => v3: > - Merge the check/set_pending_dbg helpers into a single helper, > vmx_update_pending_dbg(). Add clarifying comment to this helper. > - Rewrite commit message, descriptive comment for change in 3/5 to > explicitly describe the reason for mutating payload delivery > behavior. > - Undo the changes to kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep(). Instead, add a new hook > to call for 'full' instruction emulation + 'fast' emulation. > > KVM already provides guests the ability to use the 'monitor trap flag' > VM-execution control. Support for this flag is provided by the fact that > KVM unconditionally forwards MTF VM-exits to the guest (if requested), > as KVM doesn't utilize MTF. While this provides support during hardware > instruction execution, it is insufficient for instruction emulation. > > Should L0 emulate an instruction on the behalf of L2, L0 should also > synthesize an MTF VM-exit into L1, should control be set. > > The first patch corrects a nuanced difference between the definition of > a #DB exception payload field and DR6 register. Mask off bit 12 which is > defined in the 'pending debug exceptions' field when applying to DR6, > since the payload field is said to be compatible with the aforementioned > VMCS field. > > The second patch sets the 'pending debug exceptions' VMCS field when > delivering an INIT signal VM-exit to L1, as described in the SDM. This > patch also introduces helpers for setting the 'pending debug exceptions' > VMCS field. > > The third patch massages KVM's handling of exception payloads with > regard to API compatibility. Rather than immediately delivering the > payload w/o opt-in, instead defer the payload + inject > before completing a KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. This maintains API > compatibility whilst correcting #DB behavior with regard to higher > priority VM-exit events. > > Fourth patch introduces MTF implementation for emulated instructions. > Identify if an MTF is due on an instruction boundary from > kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep(), however only deliver this VM-exit from > vmx_check_nested_events() to respect the relative prioritization to > other VM-exits. Since this augments the nested state, introduce a new > flag for (de)serialization. > > Last patch adds tests to kvm-unit-tests to assert the correctness of MTF > under several conditions (concurrent #DB trap, #DB fault, etc). These > tests pass under virtualization with this series as well as on > bare-metal. > > Based on commit 2c2787938512 ("KVM: selftests: Stop memslot creation in > KVM internal memslot region"). > > Oliver Upton (4): > KVM: x86: Mask off reserved bit from #DB exception payload > KVM: nVMX: Handle pending #DB when injecting INIT VM-exit > KVM: x86: Deliver exception payload on KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS > KVM: nVMX: Emulate MTF when performing instruction emulation > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 + > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 + > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 5 +++ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 3 ++ > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-------- > 8 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > Queued (for 5.6-rc2), thanks. Paolo
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 3:34 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 07/02/20 11:36, Oliver Upton wrote: > > v1: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113221053.22053-1-oupton@google.com > > v2: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200128092715.69429-1-oupton@google.com > > > > v1 => v2: > > - Don't split the #DB delivery by vendors. Unconditionally injecting > > #DB payloads into the 'pending debug exceptions' field will cause KVM > > to get stuck in a loop. Per the SDM, when hardware injects an event > > resulting from this field's value, it is checked against the > > exception interception bitmap. > > - Address Sean's comments by injecting the VM-exit into L1 from > > vmx_check_nested_events(). > > - Added fix for nested INIT VM-exits + 'pending debug exceptions' field > > as it was noticed in implementing v2. > > - Drop Peter + Jim's Reviewed-by tags, as the patch set has changed > > since v1. > > > > v2 => v3: > > - Merge the check/set_pending_dbg helpers into a single helper, > > vmx_update_pending_dbg(). Add clarifying comment to this helper. > > - Rewrite commit message, descriptive comment for change in 3/5 to > > explicitly describe the reason for mutating payload delivery > > behavior. > > - Undo the changes to kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep(). Instead, add a new hook > > to call for 'full' instruction emulation + 'fast' emulation. > > > > KVM already provides guests the ability to use the 'monitor trap flag' > > VM-execution control. Support for this flag is provided by the fact that > > KVM unconditionally forwards MTF VM-exits to the guest (if requested), > > as KVM doesn't utilize MTF. While this provides support during hardware > > instruction execution, it is insufficient for instruction emulation. > > > > Should L0 emulate an instruction on the behalf of L2, L0 should also > > synthesize an MTF VM-exit into L1, should control be set. > > > > The first patch corrects a nuanced difference between the definition of > > a #DB exception payload field and DR6 register. Mask off bit 12 which is > > defined in the 'pending debug exceptions' field when applying to DR6, > > since the payload field is said to be compatible with the aforementioned > > VMCS field. > > > > The second patch sets the 'pending debug exceptions' VMCS field when > > delivering an INIT signal VM-exit to L1, as described in the SDM. This > > patch also introduces helpers for setting the 'pending debug exceptions' > > VMCS field. > > > > The third patch massages KVM's handling of exception payloads with > > regard to API compatibility. Rather than immediately delivering the > > payload w/o opt-in, instead defer the payload + inject > > before completing a KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. This maintains API > > compatibility whilst correcting #DB behavior with regard to higher > > priority VM-exit events. > > > > Fourth patch introduces MTF implementation for emulated instructions. > > Identify if an MTF is due on an instruction boundary from > > kvm_vcpu_do_singlestep(), however only deliver this VM-exit from > > vmx_check_nested_events() to respect the relative prioritization to > > other VM-exits. Since this augments the nested state, introduce a new > > flag for (de)serialization. > > > > Last patch adds tests to kvm-unit-tests to assert the correctness of MTF > > under several conditions (concurrent #DB trap, #DB fault, etc). These > > tests pass under virtualization with this series as well as on > > bare-metal. > > > > Based on commit 2c2787938512 ("KVM: selftests: Stop memslot creation in > > KVM internal memslot region"). > > > > Oliver Upton (4): > > KVM: x86: Mask off reserved bit from #DB exception payload > > KVM: nVMX: Handle pending #DB when injecting INIT VM-exit > > KVM: x86: Deliver exception payload on KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS > > KVM: nVMX: Emulate MTF when performing instruction emulation > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 + > > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 + > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 5 +++ > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 3 ++ > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-------- > > 8 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > Queued (for 5.6-rc2), thanks. > > Paolo > Are there any strong opinions about how the newly introduced nested state should be handled across live migrations? When applying this patch set internally I realized live migration would be busted in the case of a kernel rollback (i.e. a kernel with this patchset emits the nested state, kernel w/o receives it + refuses). Easy fix is to only turn on the feature once it is rollback-proof, but I wonder if there is any room for improvement on this topic.. -- Thanks, Oliver
On 27/02/20 01:22, Oliver Upton wrote: > Are there any strong opinions about how the newly introduced nested > state should be handled across live migrations? When applying this > patch set internally I realized live migration would be busted in the > case of a kernel rollback (i.e. a kernel with this patchset emits the > nested state, kernel w/o receives it + refuses). Only if you use MTF + emulation. In this case it's a pure bugfix so it's okay to break backwards migration. If it's really a new feature, it should support KVM_ENABLE_CAP to enable it. Paolo > Easy fix is to only turn on the feature once it is rollback-proof, but > I wonder if there is any room for improvement on this topic..
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:38 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 27/02/20 01:22, Oliver Upton wrote: > > Are there any strong opinions about how the newly introduced nested > > state should be handled across live migrations? When applying this > > patch set internally I realized live migration would be busted in the > > case of a kernel rollback (i.e. a kernel with this patchset emits the > > nested state, kernel w/o receives it + refuses). > > Only if you use MTF + emulation. In this case it's a pure bugfix so > it's okay to break backwards migration. If it's really a new feature, > it should support KVM_ENABLE_CAP to enable it. > > Paolo > True. I suppose I've conflated the pure bugfix here with the fact that MTF is new to us. Thanks Paolo! -- Best, Oliver > > Easy fix is to only turn on the feature once it is rollback-proof, but > > I wonder if there is any room for improvement on this topic.. >