| Message ID | 20200302122305.GA1200@embeddedor (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | ee3bc9c2232a5227ed8d5587759bf74a5413d7f9 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [next] r8152: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member | expand |
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:23:05 -0600 > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], > introduced in C99: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. > > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by > this change: > > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] > > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Applied.
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c index feedc0f964d8..9adfa2bbf593 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ struct fw_block { struct fw_header { u8 checksum[32]; char version[RTL_VER_SIZE]; - struct fw_block blocks[0]; + struct fw_block blocks[]; } __packed; /** @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ struct fw_mac { __le32 reserved; __le16 fw_ver_reg; u8 fw_ver_data; - char info[0]; + char info[]; } __packed; /** @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ struct fw_phy_nc { __le16 bp_start; __le16 bp_num; __le16 bp[4]; - char info[0]; + char info[]; } __packed; enum rtl_fw_type {
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)