Message ID | 20200304120711.12117-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | MAINTAINERS: adjust to reservation.h renaming | expand |
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv") > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry. > > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains: > > > > warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS. > > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> You'll push this too? -Daniel > > > --- > > Christian, please pick this patch. > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303 > > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > F: drivers/dma-buf/ > > F: include/linux/dma-buf* > > -F: include/linux/reservation.h > > +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h > > F: include/linux/*fence.h > > F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > > K: dma_(buf|fence|resv) > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv") > > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but > > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry. > > > > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains: > > > > > > warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > You'll push this too? > -Daniel > > > > --- > > > Christian, please pick this patch. > > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303 > > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > F: drivers/dma-buf/ > > > F: include/linux/dma-buf* > > > -F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h > > > F: include/linux/*fence.h > > > F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > > > K: dma_(buf|fence|resv) Slightly unrelated: The K: entry matches a lot of other things and may have a lot of false positive matches like any variable named dma_buffer This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl capture group. Perhaps: K: '\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b'
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:56:06AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > > > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv") > > > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but > > > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry. > > > > > > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains: > > > > > > > > warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > > > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > > > You'll push this too? > > -Daniel > > > > > > --- > > > > Christian, please pick this patch. > > > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303 > > > > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > > F: drivers/dma-buf/ > > > > F: include/linux/dma-buf* > > > > -F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h > > > > F: include/linux/*fence.h > > > > F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > > > > K: dma_(buf|fence|resv) > > Slightly unrelated: > > The K: entry matches a lot of other things > and may have a lot of false positive matches > like any variable named dma_buffer > > This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl > capture group. > > Perhaps: > > K: '\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b' Hm either people aren't using get_maintainers.pl consistently, or it doesn't seem to be a real world problem. I'm not seeing any unrelated patches on dri-devel at least. But happy to merge such a patch if it shows up ofc, it's definitely the more correct thing :-) -Daniel
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50:07AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:56:06AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 11:39 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > > > Am 04.03.20 um 13:07 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > > > > > Commit 52791eeec1d9 ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv") > > > > > renamed include/linux/reservation.h to include/linux/dma-resv.h, but > > > > > missed the reference in the MAINTAINERS entry. > > > > > > > > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains: > > > > > > > > > > warning: no file matches F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > > > > > > > Adjust the DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK entry in MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@fau.de> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > > > > > You'll push this too? > > > -Daniel > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Christian, please pick this patch. > > > > > applies cleanly on current master and next-20200303 > > > > > > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > > index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > > @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > > L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > > > F: drivers/dma-buf/ > > > > > F: include/linux/dma-buf* > > > > > -F: include/linux/reservation.h > > > > > +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h > > > > > F: include/linux/*fence.h > > > > > F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst > > > > > K: dma_(buf|fence|resv) > > > > Slightly unrelated: > > > > The K: entry matches a lot of other things > > and may have a lot of false positive matches > > like any variable named dma_buffer > > > > This should also use (?:...) to avoid a perl > > capture group. > > > > Perhaps: > > > > K: '\bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b' > > Hm either people aren't using get_maintainers.pl consistently, or it > doesn't seem to be a real world problem. I'm not seeing any unrelated > patches on dri-devel at least. > > But happy to merge such a patch if it shows up ofc, it's definitely the > more correct thing :-) Ofc as usual if you lean out the window you immediately get to eat your hat, right after sending this I got a mail from syzbot about some random stuff because of this :-) I'm gonna do the patch now ... -Daniel
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6158a143a13e..3d6cb2789c9e 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5022,7 +5022,7 @@ L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org L: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org (moderated for non-subscribers) F: drivers/dma-buf/ F: include/linux/dma-buf* -F: include/linux/reservation.h +F: include/linux/dma-resv.h F: include/linux/*fence.h F: Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst K: dma_(buf|fence|resv)