Message ID | 20200305082715.15861-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | clocksource: timer-ti-dm: Prepare for dynamic pwm period updates | expand |
* Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> [200305 08:29]: > This series fixes dm_timer_ops used for enabling the pwm and enables > cpu_pm notifier for context save and restore. This acts as a preparatory > series for enabling dynamic period updates for pwm omap dm timer driver. > > Changes since v2: > - Incorporated changes from Tony I just gave this series another try here and it still works for me just fine and is good to go as far as I'm concerned. Thanks for doing this. Regards, Tony
On 06/03/2020 18:19, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> [200305 08:29]: >> This series fixes dm_timer_ops used for enabling the pwm and enables >> cpu_pm notifier for context save and restore. This acts as a preparatory >> series for enabling dynamic period updates for pwm omap dm timer driver. >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Incorporated changes from Tony > > I just gave this series another try here and it still works > for me just fine and is good to go as far as I'm concerned. How do you want this series to be merged? Shall I pick the patches falling under drivers/clocksource or ack them? > Thanks for doing this. > > Regards, > > Tony >
Hi, * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [200312 11:11]: > On 06/03/2020 18:19, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> [200305 08:29]: > >> This series fixes dm_timer_ops used for enabling the pwm and enables > >> cpu_pm notifier for context save and restore. This acts as a preparatory > >> series for enabling dynamic period updates for pwm omap dm timer driver. > >> > >> Changes since v2: > >> - Incorporated changes from Tony > > > > I just gave this series another try here and it still works > > for me just fine and is good to go as far as I'm concerned. > > How do you want this series to be merged? > > Shall I pick the patches falling under drivers/clocksource or ack them? I think best would be if you picked them and applied them into an immutable branch against v5.6-rc1 that can also be merged into pwm driver branch as needed. Regards, Tony
Hi Tony, On 12/03/2020 18:26, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> [200312 11:11]: >> On 06/03/2020 18:19, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> [200305 08:29]: >>>> This series fixes dm_timer_ops used for enabling the pwm and enables >>>> cpu_pm notifier for context save and restore. This acts as a preparatory >>>> series for enabling dynamic period updates for pwm omap dm timer driver. >>>> >>>> Changes since v2: >>>> - Incorporated changes from Tony >>> >>> I just gave this series another try here and it still works >>> for me just fine and is good to go as far as I'm concerned. >> >> How do you want this series to be merged? >> >> Shall I pick the patches falling under drivers/clocksource or ack them? > > I think best would be if you picked them and applied them into > an immutable branch against v5.6-rc1 that can also be merged > into pwm driver branch as needed. Immutable branch based on v5.6-rc1: https://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/timer-ti-dm and merged to timers/drivers/next: https://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/next with a small conflict (fixed) with: https://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/linux.git/commit/?h=timers/drivers/next&id=6ce4fcb015a1a1290ffafcf3554901b40f9322df Regards -- Daniel