| Message ID | 20200403051709.22407-1-masahiroy@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kbuild: support 'LLVM' to switch the default tools to Clang/LLVM | expand |
Hi Masahiro, On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > PATH environment. > > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > it default. I agree this should be the default but I think it should probably be called out somewhere in the documentation as well since users might not expect to have to have a cross assembler installed. > We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > Some items in the discussion: > > - LLVM_DIR > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > ... > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > this. > > - LLVM_SUFFIX > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > ... > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > HOSTCC = clang > HOSTCXX = clang++ > else > HOSTCC = gcc > HOSTCXX = g++ > endif I would personally like to see this but I do not have the strongest opinion. > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > system. > > HOSTCC = cc > HOSTCXX = c++ > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > --- > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > @@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > whoami and host, respectively. > + > +LLVM > +---- > +If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead > +of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > HOSTLD=ld.lld > > +You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except > +for building host programs). > + > + make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld > + > Getting Help > ------------ > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > -LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > CPP = $(CC) -E > +ifneq ($(LLVM),) > +CC = clang > +LD = ld.lld > +AR = llvm-ar > +NM = llvm-nm > +OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy > +OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump > +READELF = llvm-readelf > +OBJSIZE = llvm-size > +STRIP = llvm-strip > +else > +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > +LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm > -STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump > -OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf > +OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > +STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > +endif > PAHOLE = pahole > LEX = flex > YACC = bison > -- > 2.17.1 > I have verified that the variables get their correct value with LLVM=1 and that they are still overridable. Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> # build
Hi Nathan, On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:57 PM Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Masahiro, > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > PATH environment. > > > > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > it default. > > I agree this should be the default but I think it should probably be > called out somewhere in the documentation as well since users might not > expect to have to have a cross assembler installed. I will add the following info to llvm.rst: `LLVM=1` does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler, so you still need assembler from GNU binutils. You can pass `AS=clang` to use the integrated assembler, but it is experimental as of writing. > > We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > > switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > > Some items in the discussion: > > > > - LLVM_DIR > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > ... > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > this. > > > > - LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > ... > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > > - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > HOSTCC = clang > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > else > > HOSTCC = gcc > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > endif > > I would personally like to see this but I do not have the strongest > opinion. > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > system. > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > > --- > > > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > @@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > > whoami and host, respectively. > > + > > +LLVM > > +---- > > +If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead > > +of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > > HOSTLD=ld.lld > > > > +You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except > > +for building host programs). > > + > > + make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld > > + > > Getting Help > > ------------ > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > > -LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > CPP = $(CC) -E > > +ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > +CC = clang > > +LD = ld.lld > > +AR = llvm-ar > > +NM = llvm-nm > > +OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy > > +OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump > > +READELF = llvm-readelf > > +OBJSIZE = llvm-size > > +STRIP = llvm-strip > > +else > > +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > +LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm > > -STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump > > -OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf > > +OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > > +STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > > +endif > > PAHOLE = pahole > > LEX = flex > > YACC = bison > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > I have verified that the variables get their correct value with LLVM=1 > and that they are still overridable. > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> # build > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200403085719.GA9282%40ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > PATH environment. > > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > it default. Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang LD=ld.lld ...`. We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` is set. This could even be independent of this patch. > > We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > Some items in the discussion: > > - LLVM_DIR > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > ... > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > this. > > - LLVM_SUFFIX > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > ... > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > HOSTCC = clang > HOSTCXX = clang++ > else > HOSTCC = gcc > HOSTCXX = g++ > endif > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > system. > > HOSTCC = cc > HOSTCXX = c++ > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. update-alternatives assumes you've installed Clang via a package manager? $ update-alternatives --list cc /usr/bin/gcc On my system even though clang and friends are in my PATH. And previously, there was feedback that maybe folks don't want to change `cc` on their systems just for Clang kernel builds. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/836 https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/838 A goal for ClangBuiltLinux is to build a kernel image with no GCC or binutils installed on the host. Let the record reflect that. And there's been multiple complaints that the existing syntax is too long for specifying all of the tools. LLVM=1 is meant to be one flag. Not `make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang`. If folks want fine grain flexibility, use the existing command line interface, which this patch does not change. LLVM=1 is opinionated, and inflexible, because it makes a strong choice to enable LLVM for everything. Another reason why I don't want to change these over time, and why I want them all to be in sync is that there are 4 different CI systems for the kernel, and they are currently fragmented in terms of who is using what tools: KernelCI: CC=clang only Kbuild test robot aka 0day bot: CC=clang LD=ld.lld Linaro TCWG: CC=clang only our CI: a complete mix due to combinatorial explosion, but more coverage of LLVM than everyone else. That is a mess that we must solve. Having 1 flag that works consistently across systems is one solution. Now if those were all using LLVM=1, but some were enabling Clang's integrated assembler, and some weren't because we changed the default over time, then we'd be right back to this mismatch between systems. I'd much rather draw the line in the sand, and say "this is how this flag will work, since day 1." Maybe it's too rigid, but it's important to me that if we create something new to solve multiple objectives (1. simplifies existing interface. 2. turns on everything.) that it does so. It is a partial solution, if it eliminates some of the flags while leaving others. I want a full solution. If folks want the flexibility to mix and match tools, the existing interface is capable. But for us to track who is using what, we need 1 flag that we know is not different depending on the cc of the system. Once clang's integrated assembler is good to go, we will begin recommending LLVM=1 to everyone. And we want feedback if we regress building the host utilities during a kernel build, even if there are not many. I'm on the fence about having all of the above satisfied by one patch, or taking this patch as is and following up on the above two points (related to disabling `-no-integrated-as` and setting HOSTCC). I trust your judgement and respect your decisions, so I'll defer to you Masahiro, but I need to make explicit the design goals. Maybe with this additional context it can help inform the design. Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > --- > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > @@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > whoami and host, respectively. > + > +LLVM > +---- > +If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead > +of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > HOSTLD=ld.lld > > +You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except > +for building host programs). > + > + make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld > + I would like this to be the preferred method of building to LLVM, so it should go first, followed by a footnote that says something along the lines of "if you need something more flexible, the tools can be specified in a more fine grain manner via the traditional syntax below:" > Getting Help > ------------ > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > -LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > CPP = $(CC) -E > +ifneq ($(LLVM),) > +CC = clang > +LD = ld.lld > +AR = llvm-ar > +NM = llvm-nm > +OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy > +OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump > +READELF = llvm-readelf > +OBJSIZE = llvm-size > +STRIP = llvm-strip > +else > +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > +LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm > -STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump > -OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf > +OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > +STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > +endif > PAHOLE = pahole > LEX = flex > YACC = bison > -- > 2.17.1 >
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > PATH environment. > > > > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > it default. > > Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather > that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly > negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang > LD=ld.lld ...`. > > We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. > > make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` > # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. > make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools > > Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it > there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 > of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. > So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` > is set. > > This could even be independent of this patch. I also thought a boolean flag is preferred. AS=clang will not live long anyway, and I hesitated to break the compatibility for the short-term workaround. But, if this is not a big deal, I can replace AS=clang with LLVMIA=1. > > > > We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > > switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > > Some items in the discussion: > > > > - LLVM_DIR > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > ... > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > this. > > > > - LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > ... > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > > - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > HOSTCC = clang > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > else > > HOSTCC = gcc > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > endif > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > system. > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > > update-alternatives assumes you've installed Clang via a package manager? > $ update-alternatives --list cc > /usr/bin/gcc > On my system even though clang and friends are in my PATH. > > And previously, there was feedback that maybe folks don't want to > change `cc` on their systems just for Clang kernel builds. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/836 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/838 > > A goal for ClangBuiltLinux is to build a kernel image with no GCC or > binutils installed on the host. Let the record reflect that. And > there's been multiple complaints that the existing syntax is too long > for specifying all of the tools. > > LLVM=1 is meant to be one flag. Not `make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang > HOSTCXX=clang`. If folks want fine grain flexibility, use the > existing command line interface, which this patch does not change. > LLVM=1 is opinionated, and inflexible, because it makes a strong > choice to enable LLVM for everything. > > Another reason why I don't want to change these over time, and why I > want them all to be in sync is that there are 4 different CI systems > for the kernel, and they are currently fragmented in terms of who is > using what tools: > > KernelCI: CC=clang only > Kbuild test robot aka 0day bot: CC=clang LD=ld.lld > Linaro TCWG: CC=clang only > our CI: a complete mix due to combinatorial explosion, but more > coverage of LLVM than everyone else. > > That is a mess that we must solve. Having 1 flag that works > consistently across systems is one solution. Now if those were all > using LLVM=1, but some were enabling Clang's integrated assembler, and > some weren't because we changed the default over time, then we'd be > right back to this mismatch between systems. I'd much rather draw the > line in the sand, and say "this is how this flag will work, since day > 1." Maybe it's too rigid, but it's important to me that if we create > something new to solve multiple objectives (1. simplifies existing > interface. 2. turns on everything.) that it does so. It is a partial > solution, if it eliminates some of the flags while leaving others. I > want a full solution. > > If folks want the flexibility to mix and match tools, the existing > interface is capable. But for us to track who is using what, we need > 1 flag that we know is not different depending on the cc of the > system. Once clang's integrated assembler is good to go, we will > begin recommending LLVM=1 to everyone. And we want feedback if we > regress building the host utilities during a kernel build, even if > there are not many. > > I'm on the fence about having all of the above satisfied by one patch, > or taking this patch as is and following up on the above two points > (related to disabling `-no-integrated-as` and setting HOSTCC). I > trust your judgement and respect your decisions, so I'll defer to you > Masahiro, but I need to make explicit the design goals. Maybe with > this additional context it can help inform the design. > Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Thanks for the comments. I'd rather want to do this incrementally, making sure I am doing right. The meaning of LLVM=1 may change over time. It means "the recommended settings" at the moment. If CI does not want to change the behavior across kernel versions, it can pass individual variables explicitly. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
On 2020-04-06, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: >> > >> > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a >> > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. >> > >> > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of >> > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an >> > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your >> > PATH environment. >> > >> > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. >> > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream >> > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make >> > it default. >> >> Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather >> that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly >> negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang >> LD=ld.lld ...`. >> >> We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. >> >> make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` >> # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. >> make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools >> >> Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it >> there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 >> of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. >> So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` >> is set. >> >> This could even be independent of this patch. > > >I also thought a boolean flag is preferred. > >AS=clang will not live long anyway, and >I hesitated to break the compatibility >for the short-term workaround. > >But, if this is not a big deal, I can >replace AS=clang with LLVMIA=1. My mere complaint is that it may be difficult to infer the intention (integrated assembler) from the abbreviation "IA" in "LLVMIA" :/ Something with "AS" in the name may be easier for a user to understand, e.g. CLANG_AS or LLVM_AS. >> > >> > We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean >> > switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). >> > >> > Some items in the discussion: >> > >> > - LLVM_DIR >> > >> > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting >> > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. >> > >> > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang >> > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld >> > ... >> > >> > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do >> > this. >> > >> > - LLVM_SUFFIX >> > >> > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with >> > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. >> > >> > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) >> > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) >> > ... >> > >> > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., >> > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in >> > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. >> > >> > - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. >> > >> > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: >> > >> > ifneq ($(LLVM),) >> > HOSTCC = clang >> > HOSTCXX = clang++ >> > else >> > HOSTCC = gcc >> > HOSTCXX = g++ >> > endif >> > >> > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. >> > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter >> > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the >> > system. >> > >> > HOSTCC = cc >> > HOSTCXX = c++ >> > >> > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default >> > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this >> > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. >> >> update-alternatives assumes you've installed Clang via a package manager? >> $ update-alternatives --list cc >> /usr/bin/gcc >> On my system even though clang and friends are in my PATH. >> >> And previously, there was feedback that maybe folks don't want to >> change `cc` on their systems just for Clang kernel builds. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/836 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/838 >> >> A goal for ClangBuiltLinux is to build a kernel image with no GCC or >> binutils installed on the host. Let the record reflect that. And >> there's been multiple complaints that the existing syntax is too long >> for specifying all of the tools. >> >> LLVM=1 is meant to be one flag. Not `make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang >> HOSTCXX=clang`. If folks want fine grain flexibility, use the >> existing command line interface, which this patch does not change. >> LLVM=1 is opinionated, and inflexible, because it makes a strong >> choice to enable LLVM for everything. >> >> Another reason why I don't want to change these over time, and why I >> want them all to be in sync is that there are 4 different CI systems >> for the kernel, and they are currently fragmented in terms of who is >> using what tools: >> >> KernelCI: CC=clang only >> Kbuild test robot aka 0day bot: CC=clang LD=ld.lld >> Linaro TCWG: CC=clang only >> our CI: a complete mix due to combinatorial explosion, but more >> coverage of LLVM than everyone else. >> >> That is a mess that we must solve. Having 1 flag that works >> consistently across systems is one solution. Now if those were all >> using LLVM=1, but some were enabling Clang's integrated assembler, and >> some weren't because we changed the default over time, then we'd be >> right back to this mismatch between systems. I'd much rather draw the >> line in the sand, and say "this is how this flag will work, since day >> 1." Maybe it's too rigid, but it's important to me that if we create >> something new to solve multiple objectives (1. simplifies existing >> interface. 2. turns on everything.) that it does so. It is a partial >> solution, if it eliminates some of the flags while leaving others. I >> want a full solution. >> >> If folks want the flexibility to mix and match tools, the existing >> interface is capable. But for us to track who is using what, we need >> 1 flag that we know is not different depending on the cc of the >> system. Once clang's integrated assembler is good to go, we will >> begin recommending LLVM=1 to everyone. And we want feedback if we >> regress building the host utilities during a kernel build, even if >> there are not many. >> >> I'm on the fence about having all of the above satisfied by one patch, >> or taking this patch as is and following up on the above two points >> (related to disabling `-no-integrated-as` and setting HOSTCC). I >> trust your judgement and respect your decisions, so I'll defer to you >> Masahiro, but I need to make explicit the design goals. Maybe with >> this additional context it can help inform the design. >> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> > > >Thanks for the comments. > >I'd rather want to do this incrementally, >making sure I am doing right. > > >The meaning of LLVM=1 may change over time. >It means "the recommended settings" at the moment. > >If CI does not want to change the behavior across >kernel versions, it can pass individual variables >explicitly. > >-- >Best Regards >Masahiro Yamada > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAK7LNAQybfcYiosNU%2Bybd-Q7-Y2dbLqBVN2XA00wCRnFAoqdew%40mail.gmail.com.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:55 AM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On 2020-04-06, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > >> > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > >> > > >> > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > >> > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > >> > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > >> > PATH environment. > >> > > >> > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > >> > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > >> > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > >> > it default. > >> > >> Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather > >> that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly > >> negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang > >> LD=ld.lld ...`. > >> > >> We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. > >> > >> make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` > >> # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. > >> make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools > >> > >> Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it > >> there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 > >> of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. > >> So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` > >> is set. > >> > >> This could even be independent of this patch. > > > > > >I also thought a boolean flag is preferred. > > > >AS=clang will not live long anyway, and > >I hesitated to break the compatibility > >for the short-term workaround. > > > >But, if this is not a big deal, I can > >replace AS=clang with LLVMIA=1. > > My mere complaint is that it may be difficult to infer the intention (integrated > assembler) from the abbreviation "IA" in "LLVMIA" :/ > > Something with "AS" in the name may be easier for a user to understand, > e.g. CLANG_AS or LLVM_AS. I see 'llvm-as' in my PATH, but it is a different kind of tool, right? (converter from LLVM assembler *.ll to LLVM bit code *.bc) So, I thought "LLVM_AS" might be confusing.
On 2020-04-06, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:55 AM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux ><clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> On 2020-04-06, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> >On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a >> >> > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. >> >> > >> >> > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of >> >> > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an >> >> > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your >> >> > PATH environment. >> >> > >> >> > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. >> >> > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream >> >> > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make >> >> > it default. >> >> >> >> Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather >> >> that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly >> >> negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang >> >> LD=ld.lld ...`. >> >> >> >> We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. >> >> >> >> make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` >> >> # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. >> >> make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools >> >> >> >> Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it >> >> there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 >> >> of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. >> >> So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` >> >> is set. >> >> >> >> This could even be independent of this patch. >> > >> > >> >I also thought a boolean flag is preferred. >> > >> >AS=clang will not live long anyway, and >> >I hesitated to break the compatibility >> >for the short-term workaround. >> > >> >But, if this is not a big deal, I can >> >replace AS=clang with LLVMIA=1. >> >> My mere complaint is that it may be difficult to infer the intention (integrated >> assembler) from the abbreviation "IA" in "LLVMIA" :/ >> >> Something with "AS" in the name may be easier for a user to understand, >> e.g. CLANG_AS or LLVM_AS. > >I see 'llvm-as' in my PATH, >but it is a different kind of tool, right? >(converter from LLVM assembler *.ll to LLVM bit code *.bc) > >So, I thought "LLVM_AS" might be confusing. You are right. llvm-as converts a textual form of LLVM IR (.ll) to a binary form bitcode (.bc). LLVM_AS is confusing. CLANG_AS/CLANGAS might be suitable. clang a.c '-###' => clang -cc1 # like gcc invokes cc1 clang a.s '-###' => clang -cc1as # this invokes the integrated assembler
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:34 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:55 AM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux > <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > On 2020-04-06, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > >On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 3:24 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > >> > full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > >> > > > >> > Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > >> > GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > >> > environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > >> > PATH environment. > > >> > > > >> > Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > >> > You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > >> > kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > >> > it default. > > >> > > >> Having this behavior change over time may be surprising. I'd rather > > >> that if you want to not use the integrated assembler, you explicitly > > >> negate it, or just don't use the LLVM=1 syntax, ie. `make CC=clang > > >> LD=ld.lld ...`. > > >> > > >> We could modify how `-no-integrated-as` is chosen when LLVM=1. > > >> > > >> make LLVM=1 LLVMIA=0 ... # add `-no-integrated-as` > > >> # what the flag is doesn't really matter to me, something shorter might be nice. > > >> make LLVM=1 # use all LLVM tools > > >> > > >> Since we got rid of $(AS), it would be appropriate to remove/change it > > >> there, since no one really relies on AS=clang right now. (We do have 1 > > >> of our 60+ CI targets using it, but we can also change that trivially. > > >> So I think we have a lot of freedom to change how `-no-integrated-as` > > >> is set. > > >> > > >> This could even be independent of this patch. > > > > > > > > >I also thought a boolean flag is preferred. > > > > > >AS=clang will not live long anyway, and > > >I hesitated to break the compatibility > > >for the short-term workaround. > > > > > >But, if this is not a big deal, I can > > >replace AS=clang with LLVMIA=1. > > > > My mere complaint is that it may be difficult to infer the intention (integrated > > assembler) from the abbreviation "IA" in "LLVMIA" :/ > > > > Something with "AS" in the name may be easier for a user to understand, > > e.g. CLANG_AS or LLVM_AS. > > > > > I see 'llvm-as' in my PATH, > but it is a different kind of tool, right? > (converter from LLVM assembler *.ll to LLVM bit code *.bc) > > So, I thought "LLVM_AS" might be confusing. > Indeed LLVM_AS is confusing as llvm-as is different to Clang's integrated assembler. So CLANG_AS might be a better choice. - sed@ -
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your >PATH environment. > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make >it default. > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > >Some items in the discussion: > >- LLVM_DIR > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > ... > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > this. > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > ... > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > HOSTCC = clang > HOSTCXX = clang++ > else > HOSTCC = gcc > HOSTCXX = g++ > endif > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > system. > > HOSTCC = cc > HOSTCXX = c++ What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. Cheers, Matthias > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> >--- > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst >@@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > whoami and host, respectively. >+ >+LLVM >+---- >+If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead >+of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst >index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst >@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > HOSTLD=ld.lld > >+You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except >+for building host programs). >+ >+ make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld >+ > Getting Help > ------------ > >diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 >--- a/Makefile >+++ b/Makefile >@@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) >-LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld >-CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > CPP = $(CC) -E >+ifneq ($(LLVM),) >+CC = clang >+LD = ld.lld >+AR = llvm-ar >+NM = llvm-nm >+OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy >+OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump >+READELF = llvm-readelf >+OBJSIZE = llvm-size >+STRIP = llvm-strip >+else >+CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc >+LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm >-STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump >-OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf >+OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size >+STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip >+endif > PAHOLE = pahole > LEX = flex > YACC = bison >-- >2.17.1 > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200403051709.22407-1-masahiroy%40kernel.org.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > >PATH environment. > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > >it default. > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > >Some items in the discussion: > > > >- LLVM_DIR > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > ... > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > this. > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > ... > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > HOSTCC = clang > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > else > > HOSTCC = gcc > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > endif > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > system. > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. The build system of objtool is meh. :( HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh DESCEND objtool error: unknown warning option '-Wstrict-aliasing=3'; did you mean '-Wstring-plus-int'? [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option] HOSTCC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep.o HOSTLD /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep-in.o LINK /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/exec-cmd.o CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/help.o CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/pager.o > Cheers, > Matthias > > > > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > > > >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > >--- > > > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > >index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 > >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > >@@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > > whoami and host, respectively. > >+ > >+LLVM > >+---- > >+If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead > >+of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. > >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > >index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 > >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > >@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > > HOSTLD=ld.lld > > > >+You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except > >+for building host programs). > >+ > >+ make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld > >+ > > Getting Help > > ------------ > > > >diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > >index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 > >--- a/Makefile > >+++ b/Makefile > >@@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > >-LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > >-CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > CPP = $(CC) -E > >+ifneq ($(LLVM),) > >+CC = clang > >+LD = ld.lld > >+AR = llvm-ar > >+NM = llvm-nm > >+OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy > >+OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump > >+READELF = llvm-readelf > >+OBJSIZE = llvm-size > >+STRIP = llvm-strip > >+else > >+CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > >+LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm > >-STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump > >-OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf > >+OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > >+STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > >+endif > > PAHOLE = pahole > > LEX = flex > > YACC = bison > >-- > >2.17.1 > > > >-- > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200403051709.22407-1-masahiroy%40kernel.org. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200406112220.GB126804%40google.com.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > >PATH environment. > > > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > >it default. > > > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > > > >Some items in the discussion: > > > > > >- LLVM_DIR > > > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > > ... > > > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > > this. > > > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > ... > > > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > > HOSTCC = clang > > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > > else > > > HOSTCC = gcc > > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > > endif > > > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > > system. > > > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not > > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require > > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into > > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain > > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. > > > HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. > > > > HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. > > The build system of objtool is meh. :( Let's tackle that in a follow up, with the goal of build hermiticity in mind. I think there's good feedback in this thread to inform the design of a v2: 1. CLANG_AS=0 to disable integrated as. Hopefully we won't need this much longer, so we don't need to spend too much time on this, Masahiro please just choose a name for this. llvm-as naming conventions doesn't follow the rest of binutils. 2. HOSTCC=clang HOSTLD=ld.lld set by LLVM=1 for helping with build hermiticity. > > > HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o > HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh > DESCEND objtool > error: unknown warning option '-Wstrict-aliasing=3'; did you mean > '-Wstring-plus-int'? [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option] > HOSTCC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep.o > HOSTLD /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep-in.o > LINK /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/fixdep > CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/exec-cmd.o > CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/help.o > CC /home/masahiro/workspace/linux-kbuild/tools/objtool/pager.o > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Matthias > > > > > > > > Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default > > > to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this > > > approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> > > >--- > > > > > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ > > > Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ > > > Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > >index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 > > >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst > > >@@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST > > > These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during > > > boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands > > > whoami and host, respectively. > > >+ > > >+LLVM > > >+---- > > >+If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead > > >+of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. > > >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > >index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 > > >--- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > >+++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst > > >@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. > > > READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ > > > HOSTLD=ld.lld > > > > > >+You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except > > >+for building host programs). > > >+ > > >+ make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld > > >+ > > > Getting Help > > > ------------ > > > > > >diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > >index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 > > >--- a/Makefile > > >+++ b/Makefile > > >@@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) > > > KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) > > > > > > # Make variables (CC, etc...) > > >-LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > >-CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > > CPP = $(CC) -E > > >+ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > >+CC = clang > > >+LD = ld.lld > > >+AR = llvm-ar > > >+NM = llvm-nm > > >+OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy > > >+OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump > > >+READELF = llvm-readelf > > >+OBJSIZE = llvm-size > > >+STRIP = llvm-strip > > >+else > > >+CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc > > >+LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld > > > AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar > > > NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm > > >-STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > > > OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy > > > OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump > > >-OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > > > READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf > > >+OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size > > >+STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip > > >+endif > > > PAHOLE = pahole > > > LEX = flex > > > YACC = bison > > >-- > > >2.17.1 > > > > > >-- > > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > > >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200403051709.22407-1-masahiroy%40kernel.org. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/20200406112220.GB126804%40google.com. > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAK7LNARkFN8jTD8F3CU7r_AL8dbqaKpUuou4MCLZvAYLGs9bYA%40mail.gmail.com.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built > > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > > > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > > >PATH environment. > > > > > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > > >it default. > > > > > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > > > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > > > > > >Some items in the discussion: > > > > > > > >- LLVM_DIR > > > > > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > > > ... > > > > > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > > > this. > > > > > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > > ... > > > > > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > > > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > > > HOSTCC = clang > > > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > > > else > > > > HOSTCC = gcc > > > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > > > endif > > > > > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > > > system. > > > > > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > > > > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not > > > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require > > > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into > > > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain > > > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. > > > > > > HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. > > > > > > > > HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. > > > > The build system of objtool is meh. :( > > Let's tackle that in a follow up, with the goal of build hermiticity > in mind. I think there's good feedback in this thread to inform the > design of a v2: > 1. CLANG_AS=0 to disable integrated as. Hopefully we won't need this > much longer, so we don't need to spend too much time on this, Masahiro > please just choose a name for this. llvm-as naming conventions > doesn't follow the rest of binutils. I am not so familiar with the terminology in LLVM, but I feel 'integrated' is a keyword IMHO. I prefer LLVM_IA=1. (or LLVM_INTEGRATED_AS=1) > 2. HOSTCC=clang HOSTLD=ld.lld set by LLVM=1 for helping with build hermiticity. >
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:47 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built > > > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > > > > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > > > > > > > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > > > > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > > > > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > > > > >PATH environment. > > > > > > > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > > > > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > > > > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > > > > >it default. > > > > > > > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > > > > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > > > > > > > > > >Some items in the discussion: > > > > > > > > > >- LLVM_DIR > > > > > > > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > > > > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > > > > > > > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > > > > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > > > > > > > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > > > > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > > > > > > > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > > > > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > > > > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > > > > > > > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > > > > > > > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > > > > > > > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > > > > > HOSTCC = clang > > > > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > > > > > else > > > > > HOSTCC = gcc > > > > > HOSTCXX = g++ > > > > > endif > > > > > > > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > > > > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > > > > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > > > > > system. > > > > > > > > > > HOSTCC = cc > > > > > HOSTCXX = c++ > > > > > > > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not > > > > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require > > > > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into > > > > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain > > > > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. > > > > > > > > > HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. > > > > > > > > > > > > HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. > > > > > > The build system of objtool is meh. :( > > > > Let's tackle that in a follow up, with the goal of build hermiticity > > in mind. I think there's good feedback in this thread to inform the > > design of a v2: > > 1. CLANG_AS=0 to disable integrated as. Hopefully we won't need this > > much longer, so we don't need to spend too much time on this, Masahiro > > please just choose a name for this. llvm-as naming conventions > > doesn't follow the rest of binutils. > > I am not so familiar with the terminology in LLVM, > but I feel 'integrated' is a keyword IMHO. > I prefer LLVM_IA=1. (or LLVM_INTEGRATED_AS=1) I'm happy with either, and I trust your judgement. You choose. Hopefully we will fix all our assembler bugs soon and won't need the flag much longer.
On 2020-04-07, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote: >On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:47 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built >> > > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > > > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a >> > > > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. >> > > > > >> > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of >> > > > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an >> > > > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your >> > > > >PATH environment. >> > > > > >> > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. >> > > > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream >> > > > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make >> > > > >it default. >> > > > > >> > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean >> > > > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). >> > > > > >> > > > >Some items in the discussion: >> > > > > >> > > > >- LLVM_DIR >> > > > > >> > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting >> > > > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. >> > > > > >> > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang >> > > > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld >> > > > > ... >> > > > > >> > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do >> > > > > this. >> > > > > >> > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX >> > > > > >> > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with >> > > > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. >> > > > > >> > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) >> > > > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) >> > > > > ... >> > > > > >> > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., >> > > > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in >> > > > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. >> > > > > >> > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. >> > > > > >> > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: >> > > > > >> > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) >> > > > > HOSTCC = clang >> > > > > HOSTCXX = clang++ >> > > > > else >> > > > > HOSTCC = gcc >> > > > > HOSTCXX = g++ >> > > > > endif >> > > > > >> > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. >> > > > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter >> > > > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the >> > > > > system. >> > > > > >> > > > > HOSTCC = cc >> > > > > HOSTCXX = c++ >> > > > >> > > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not >> > > > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require >> > > > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into >> > > > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain >> > > > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. >> > > >> > > >> > > HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. >> > > >> > > The build system of objtool is meh. :( >> > >> > Let's tackle that in a follow up, with the goal of build hermiticity >> > in mind. I think there's good feedback in this thread to inform the >> > design of a v2: >> > 1. CLANG_AS=0 to disable integrated as. Hopefully we won't need this >> > much longer, so we don't need to spend too much time on this, Masahiro >> > please just choose a name for this. llvm-as naming conventions >> > doesn't follow the rest of binutils. >> >> I am not so familiar with the terminology in LLVM, >> but I feel 'integrated' is a keyword IMHO. >> I prefer LLVM_IA=1. (or LLVM_INTEGRATED_AS=1) > >I'm happy with either, and I trust your judgement. You choose. >Hopefully we will fix all our assembler bugs soon and won't need the >flag much longer. Maybe "IAS", e.g. LLVM_IAS=1 or CLANG_IAS=1 IAS is referred to in a few places. IA is not a common abbreviation. I don't have strong opinion here and thank Masahiro a lot for the improvement! > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clang Built Linux" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clang-built-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clang-built-linux/CAKwvOdkicpNMqQipZ%2BAMTEz7JVou3bkcKiQ3Cih20qH0hoziDg%40mail.gmail.com.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:19 AM Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-04-07, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 10:47 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 AM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:22 PM 'Matthias Maennich' via Clang Built > >> > > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:17:09PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> > > > >As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a > >> > > > >full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of > >> > > > >GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an > >> > > > >environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your > >> > > > >PATH environment. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. > >> > > > >You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream > >> > > > >kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make > >> > > > >it default. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean > >> > > > >switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). > >> > > > > > >> > > > >Some items in the discussion: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >- LLVM_DIR > >> > > > > > >> > > > > When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting > >> > > > > LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang > >> > > > > LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld > >> > > > > ... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do > >> > > > > this. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >- LLVM_SUFFIX > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with > >> > > > > naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) > >> > > > > LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) > >> > > > > ... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., > >> > > > > but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in > >> > > > > /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >- HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > We can switch the host compilers in the same way: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > ifneq ($(LLVM),) > >> > > > > HOSTCC = clang > >> > > > > HOSTCXX = clang++ > >> > > > > else > >> > > > > HOSTCC = gcc > >> > > > > HOSTCXX = g++ > >> > > > > endif > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. > >> > > > > Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter > >> > > > > solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the > >> > > > > system. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > HOSTCC = cc > >> > > > > HOSTCXX = c++ > >> > > > > >> > > > What about HOSTLD ? I saw recently, that setting HOSTLD=ld.lld is not > >> > > > yielding the expected result (some tools, like e.g. fixdep still require > >> > > > an `ld` to be in PATH to be built). I did not find the time to look into > >> > > > that yet, but I would like to consistently switch to the llvm toolchain > >> > > > (including linker and possibly more) also for hostprogs. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > HOSTLD=ld.lld worked for me, but HOSTCC=clang did not. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > HOSTCC=clang without CC=clang fails to build objtool. > >> > > > >> > > The build system of objtool is meh. :( > >> > > >> > Let's tackle that in a follow up, with the goal of build hermiticity > >> > in mind. I think there's good feedback in this thread to inform the > >> > design of a v2: > >> > 1. CLANG_AS=0 to disable integrated as. Hopefully we won't need this > >> > much longer, so we don't need to spend too much time on this, Masahiro > >> > please just choose a name for this. llvm-as naming conventions > >> > doesn't follow the rest of binutils. > >> > >> I am not so familiar with the terminology in LLVM, > >> but I feel 'integrated' is a keyword IMHO. > >> I prefer LLVM_IA=1. (or LLVM_INTEGRATED_AS=1) > > > >I'm happy with either, and I trust your judgement. You choose. > >Hopefully we will fix all our assembler bugs soon and won't need the > >flag much longer. > > Maybe "IAS", e.g. LLVM_IAS=1 or CLANG_IAS=1 > > IAS is referred to in a few places. IA is not a common abbreviation. > > I don't have strong opinion here and thank Masahiro a lot for the > improvement! > OK, I will rename it to LLVM_IAS. Thanks for the advice.
diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst index 510f38d7e78a..2d1fc03d346e 100644 --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst @@ -262,3 +262,8 @@ KBUILD_BUILD_USER, KBUILD_BUILD_HOST These two variables allow to override the user@host string displayed during boot and in /proc/version. The default value is the output of the commands whoami and host, respectively. + +LLVM +---- +If this variable is set to 1, Kbuild will use Clang and LLVM utilities instead +of GCC and GNU binutils to build the kernel. diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst index d6c79eb4e23e..4602369f6a4f 100644 --- a/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ additional parameters to `make`. READELF=llvm-readelf HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar \\ HOSTLD=ld.lld +You can use a single switch `LLVM=1` to use LLVM utilities by default (except +for building host programs). + + make LLVM=1 HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTAR=llvm-ar HOSTLD=ld.lld + Getting Help ------------ diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c91342953d9e..6db89ecdd942 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -409,16 +409,28 @@ KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS := $(HOST_LFS_LDFLAGS) $(HOSTLDFLAGS) KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS := $(HOST_LFS_LIBS) $(HOSTLDLIBS) # Make variables (CC, etc...) -LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc CPP = $(CC) -E +ifneq ($(LLVM),) +CC = clang +LD = ld.lld +AR = llvm-ar +NM = llvm-nm +OBJCOPY = llvm-objcopy +OBJDUMP = llvm-objdump +READELF = llvm-readelf +OBJSIZE = llvm-size +STRIP = llvm-strip +else +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc +LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm -STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip OBJCOPY = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objcopy OBJDUMP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)objdump -OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size READELF = $(CROSS_COMPILE)readelf +OBJSIZE = $(CROSS_COMPILE)size +STRIP = $(CROSS_COMPILE)strip +endif PAHOLE = pahole LEX = flex YACC = bison
As Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst implies, building the kernel with a full set of LLVM tools gets very verbose and unwieldy. Provide a single switch 'LLVM' to use Clang and LLVM tools instead of GCC and Binutils. You can pass LLVM=1 from the command line or as an environment variable. Then, Kbuild will use LLVM toolchains in your PATH environment. Please note LLVM=1 does not turn on the LLVM integrated assembler. You need to explicitly pass AS=clang to use it. When the upstream kernel is ready for the integrated assembler, I think we can make it default. We discussed what we need, and we agreed to go with a simple boolean switch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/494). Some items in the discussion: - LLVM_DIR When multiple versions of LLVM are installed, I just thought supporting LLVM_DIR=/path/to/my/llvm/bin/ might be useful. CC = $(LLVM_DIR)clang LD = $(LLVM_DIR)ld.lld ... However, we can handle this by modifying PATH. So, we decided to not do this. - LLVM_SUFFIX Some distributions (e.g. Debian) package specific versions of LLVM with naming conventions that use the version as a suffix. CC = clang$(LLVM_SUFFIX) LD = ld.lld(LLVM_SUFFIX) ... will allow a user to pass LLVM_SUFFIX=-11 to use clang-11 etc., but the suffixed versions in /usr/bin/ are symlinks to binaries in /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin/, so this can also be handled by PATH. - HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, etc. We can switch the host compilers in the same way: ifneq ($(LLVM),) HOSTCC = clang HOSTCXX = clang++ else HOSTCC = gcc HOSTCXX = g++ endif This may the right thing to do, but I could not make up my mind. Because we do not frequently switch the host compiler, a counter solution I had in my mind was to leave it to the default of the system. HOSTCC = cc HOSTCXX = c++ Many distributions support update-alternatives to switch the default to GCC, Clang, or whatever, but reviewers were opposed to this approach. So, this commit does not touch the host tools. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> --- Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 5 +++++ Documentation/kbuild/llvm.rst | 5 +++++ Makefile | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)