Message ID | 1583944596-23410-1-git-send-email-yibin.gong@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add ecspi ERR009165 for i.mx6/7 soc family | expand |
Ping.... On 2020/03/11 16:35 Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com> wrote: > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO transfer to > be send twice in DMA mode. Please get more information from: > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX6DQCE.pdf. The workaround is > adding new sdma ram script which works in XCH mode as PIO inside sdma > instead of SMC mode, meanwhile, 'TX_THRESHOLD' should be 0. The issue > should be exist on all legacy i.mx6/7 soc family before i.mx6ul. > NXP fix this design issue from i.mx6ul, so newer chips including i.mx6ul/ > 6ull/6sll do not need this workaroud anymore. All other i.mx6/7/8 chips still > need this workaroud. This patch set add new 'fsl,imx6ul-ecspi' > for ecspi driver and 'ecspi_fixed' in sdma driver to choose if need errata or not. > The first two reverted patches should be the same issue, though, it seems > 'fixed' by changing to other shp script. Hope Sean or Sascha could have the > chance to test this patch set if could fix their issues. > Besides, enable sdma support for i.mx8mm/8mq and fix ecspi1 not work on > i.mx8mm because the event id is zero. > > PS: > Please get sdma firmware from below linux-firmware and copy it to your > local rootfs /lib/firmware/imx/sdma. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tr > ee/imx/sdma > > v2: > 1.Add commit log for reverted patches. > 2.Add comment for 'ecspi_fixed' in sdma driver. > 3.Add 'fsl,imx6sll-ecspi' compatible instead of 'fsl,imx6ul-ecspi' > rather than remove. > v3: > 1.Confirm with design team make sure ERR009165 fixed on i.mx6ul/i.mx6ull > /i.mx6sll, not fixed on i.mx8m/8mm and other i.mx6/7 legacy chips. > Correct dts related dts patch in v2. > 2.Clean eratta information in binding doc and new 'tx_glitch_fixed' flag > in spi-imx driver to state ERR009165 fixed or not. > 3.Enlarge burst size to fifo size for tx since tx_wml set to 0 in the > errata workaroud, thus improve performance as possible. > v4: > 1.Add Ack tag from Mark and Vinod > 2.Remove checking 'event_id1' zero as 'event_id0'. > v5: > 1.Add the last patch for compatible with the current uart driver which > using rom script, so both uart ram script and rom script supported > in latest firmware, by default uart rom script used. UART driver > will be broken without this patch. > v6: > 1.Resend after rebase the latest next branch. > 2.Remove below No.13~No.15 patches of v5 because they were mergered. > ARM: dts: imx6ul: add dma support on ecspi > ARM: dts: imx6sll: correct sdma compatible > arm64: defconfig: Enable SDMA on i.mx8mq/8mm > 3.Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context cache" since > 'context_loaded' removed. > v7: > 1.Put the last patch 13/13 'Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context > cache"' to the ahead of 03/13 'Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: refine > to load context only once" so that no building waring during comes out > during bisect. > 2.Address Sascha's comments, including eliminating any i.mx6sx in this > series, adding new 'is_imx6ul_ecspi()' instead imx in imx51 and taking > care SMC bit for PIO. > 3.Add back missing 'Reviewed-by' tag on 08/15(v5):09/13(v7) > 'spi: imx: add new i.mx6ul compatible name in binding doc' > > Robin Gong (13): > Revert "ARM: dts: imx6q: Use correct SDMA script for SPI5 core" > Revert "ARM: dts: imx6: Use correct SDMA script for SPI cores" > Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context cache" > Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: refine to load context only once" > dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove dupilicated sdma_load_context > dmaengine: imx-sdma: add mcu_2_ecspi script > spi: imx: fix ERR009165 > spi: imx: remove ERR009165 workaround on i.mx6ul > spi: imx: add new i.mx6ul compatible name in binding doc > dmaengine: imx-sdma: remove ERR009165 on i.mx6ul > dma: imx-sdma: add i.mx6ul compatible name > dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix ecspi1 rx dma not work on i.mx8mm > dmaengine: imx-sdma: add uart rom script > > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-imx-sdma.txt | 1 + > .../devicetree/bindings/spi/fsl-imx-cspi.txt | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 8 +-- > drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 67 > ++++++++++++++-------- > drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 61 > +++++++++++++++++--- > include/linux/platform_data/dma-imx-sdma.h | 8 ++- > 7 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:41:17AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote: > Ping.... > On 2020/03/11 16:35 Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com> wrote: > > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO transfer to Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
Hi Robin, On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 09:35, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com> wrote: > > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO > transfer to be send twice in DMA mode. Please get more information from: > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX6DQCE.pdf. The workaround is adding > new sdma ram script which works in XCH mode as PIO inside sdma instead > of SMC mode, meanwhile, 'TX_THRESHOLD' should be 0. The issue should be > exist on all legacy i.mx6/7 soc family before i.mx6ul. > NXP fix this design issue from i.mx6ul, so newer chips including i.mx6ul/ > 6ull/6sll do not need this workaroud anymore. All other i.mx6/7/8 chips > still need this workaroud. This patch set add new 'fsl,imx6ul-ecspi' > for ecspi driver and 'ecspi_fixed' in sdma driver to choose if need errata > or not. > The first two reverted patches should be the same issue, though, it > seems 'fixed' by changing to other shp script. Hope Sean or Sascha could > have the chance to test this patch set if could fix their issues. > Besides, enable sdma support for i.mx8mm/8mq and fix ecspi1 not work > on i.mx8mm because the event id is zero. > > PS: > Please get sdma firmware from below linux-firmware and copy it to your > local rootfs /lib/firmware/imx/sdma. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/imx/sdma > A couple of questions 1) Is this series needed for the i.MX6DL? (the document you linked only seems to mention i.MX6D/Q 2) If the laterst SDMA firmware mentionned above is used will this break systems running mainline kernels without this patch series applied? Regards, Martin
On 2020/04/15 17:20 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:41:17AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote: > > Ping.... > > On 2020/03/11 16:35 Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com> wrote: > > > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO > > > transfer to > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for > review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so > unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at > least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then > people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if > something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so > sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other > maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem > are normally handled. Thanks Mark for the kind reminding. Will resend patches instead.
On 2020/04/15 17:47 Fuzzey, Martin <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group> wrote:d > Hi Robin, > > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 09:35, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com> wrote: > > > > There is ecspi ERR009165 on i.mx6/7 soc family, which cause FIFO > > transfer to be send twice in DMA mode. Please get more information from: > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > > > nxp.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Ferrata%2FIMX6DQCE.pdf&data=02%7C01%7C > yibin.g > > > ong%40nxp.com%7Caf3ad866d3274fce2aaf08d7e121ffb8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c > 6fa92 > > > cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637225408450989272&sdata=av3%2FnSaP > pQ6rHlkmFAooZS6P8fnxC%2Bm7sJrBg30dUZs%3D&reserved=0. The > workaround is adding new sdma ram script which works in XCH mode as PIO > inside sdma instead of SMC mode, meanwhile, 'TX_THRESHOLD' should be 0. > The issue should be exist on all legacy i.mx6/7 soc family before i.mx6ul. > > NXP fix this design issue from i.mx6ul, so newer chips including > > i.mx6ul/ 6ull/6sll do not need this workaroud anymore. All other > > i.mx6/7/8 chips still need this workaroud. This patch set add new > 'fsl,imx6ul-ecspi' > > for ecspi driver and 'ecspi_fixed' in sdma driver to choose if need > > errata or not. > > The first two reverted patches should be the same issue, though, it > > seems 'fixed' by changing to other shp script. Hope Sean or Sascha > > could have the chance to test this patch set if could fix their issues. > > Besides, enable sdma support for i.mx8mm/8mq and fix ecspi1 not work > > on i.mx8mm because the event id is zero. > > > > PS: > > Please get sdma firmware from below linux-firmware and copy it to > > your local rootfs /lib/firmware/imx/sdma. > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit. > > > kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ffirmware%2Flinux-firm > w > > > are.git%2Ftree%2Fimx%2Fsdma&data=02%7C01%7Cyibin.gong%40nxp.co > m%7C > > > af3ad866d3274fce2aaf08d7e121ffb8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635 > %7C > > > 0%7C1%7C637225408450999264&sdata=%2BgcoGJqUKAkZbc%2BXgtXPsp > d6X7p0G > > Ds7ndyHY4i1wp0%3D&reserved=0 > > > > A couple of questions > > 1) Is this series needed for the i.MX6DL? (the document you linked only seems > to mention i.MX6D/Q Yes, it's needed for all i.mx6 legacy chips include i.MX6DL since they share the same ecspi IP. Show the i.MX6D/Q document as a sample. > 2) If the laterst SDMA firmware mentionned above is used will this break > systems running mainline kernels without this patch series applied? No basic function broken with the latest SDMA firmware and mainline kernel without this patch series, but the ecspi issue ERR009165 is still here then.