Message ID | 20200406112800.23762-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* | expand |
On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > Now we have struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros which include > device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the > warnings originate from. > > This series converts WARN* with drm_WARN* where struct drm_device > pointer can be extracted. I think I pushed all the patches that I didn't comment on separately, and that still applied. BR, Jani.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:35:08AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote: > > Now we have struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros which include > > device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the > > warnings originate from. > > > > This series converts WARN* with drm_WARN* where struct drm_device > > pointer can be extracted. > > I think I pushed all the patches that I didn't comment on separately, > and that still applied. Thank you Jani. Will rework on pending patches and resubmit. Thanks, Pankaj > > BR, > Jani. > > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center