Message ID | 20200430220619.3169-10-ansuelsmth@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Multiple fixes in PCIe qcom driver | expand |
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:06:16AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > From: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > Add tx term offset support to pcie qcom driver need in some revision of > the ipq806x SoC. > Ipq8064 have tx term offset set to 7. > Ipq8064-v2 revision and ipq8065 have the tx term offset set to 0. > > Signed-off-by: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ > #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, 16) > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) > + > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C > #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) > #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) > @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { > u32 tx_swing_full; > u32 tx_swing_low; > u32 rx0_eq; > + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; > }; > > struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { > @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) > return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; Based on my other comments, you'll want to turn this into match data. > + else > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 0; > +
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:06:16AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > From: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > > > Add tx term offset support to pcie qcom driver need in some revision of > > the ipq806x SoC. > > Ipq8064 have tx term offset set to 7. > > Ipq8064-v2 revision and ipq8065 have the tx term offset set to 0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ > > #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 > > > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 > > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, > 16) > > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) > > + > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C > > #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) > > #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) > > @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { > > u32 tx_swing_full; > > u32 tx_swing_low; > > u32 rx0_eq; > > + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; > > }; > > > > struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { > > @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int > qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) > > return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); > > > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) > > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; > > Based on my other comments, you'll want to turn this into match data. > I don't understand what you mean here. I really can't think of another way to set this only for qcom,pci-ipq8064 as ipq8064-v2 and apq8064 use the same get resource function. Should I create a different get_resources for the other 2 device? > > + else > > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 0; > > +
Hi Ansuel, On 5/1/20 1:06 AM, Ansuel Smith wrote: > From: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > Add tx term offset support to pcie qcom driver need in some revision of > the ipq806x SoC. > Ipq8064 have tx term offset set to 7. > Ipq8064-v2 revision and ipq8065 have the tx term offset set to 0. > > Signed-off-by: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ > #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, 16) The mask definition is not correct. Should be GENMASK(20, 16) > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) > + > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C > #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) > #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) > @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { > u32 tx_swing_full; > u32 tx_swing_low; > u32 rx0_eq; > + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; > }; > > struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { > @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) > return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; Before your change the phy_tx0_term_offser was 0 for apq8064, but here you change it to 7, why? > + else > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 0; > + > res->phy_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy"); > return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(res->phy_reset); > } > @@ -402,6 +411,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > /* enable PCIe clocks and resets */ > qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, BIT(0), 0); > > + /* set TX termination offset */ > + qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, > + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK, As the mask definition is incorrect you actually clear 12 to 16 bit in the register where is another PHY parameter. Is that was intentional? > + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(res->phy_tx0_term_offset)); > + > writel(PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN1(res->tx_deemph_gen1) | > PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_3_5DB(res->tx_deemph_gen2_3p5db) | > PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_6DB(res->tx_deemph_gen2_6db), > @@ -1485,6 +1499,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = { > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8084", .data = &ops_1_0_0 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-msm8996", .data = &ops_2_3_2 }, > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &ops_2_3_3 }, >
> Hi Ansuel, > > On 5/1/20 1:06 AM, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > From: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > > > Add tx term offset support to pcie qcom driver need in some revision of > > the ipq806x SoC. > > Ipq8064 have tx term offset set to 7. > > Ipq8064-v2 revision and ipq8065 have the tx term offset set to 0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c > > @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ > > #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 > > > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 > > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, > 16) > > The mask definition is not correct. Should be GENMASK(20, 16) > > > +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) > > + > > #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C > > #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) > > #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) > > @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { > > u32 tx_swing_full; > > u32 tx_swing_low; > > u32 rx0_eq; > > + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; > > }; > > > > struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { > > @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int > qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) > > if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) > > return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); > > > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) > > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; > > Before your change the phy_tx0_term_offser was 0 for apq8064, but here > you change it to 7, why? > apq8064 board should use qcom,pcie-apq8064 right? This should be set to 0 only with pcie-ipq8064 compatible. Tell me if I'm wrong. > > + else > > + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 0; > > + > > res->phy_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy"); > > return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(res->phy_reset); > > } > > @@ -402,6 +411,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_1_0(struct > qcom_pcie *pcie) > > /* enable PCIe clocks and resets */ > > qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, > BIT(0), 0); > > > > + /* set TX termination offset */ > > + qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, > > + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK, > > As the mask definition is incorrect you actually clear 12 to 16 bit in > the register where is another PHY parameter. Is that was intentional? > Will check this and the wrong genmask. > > + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(res- > >phy_tx0_term_offset)); > > + > > writel(PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN1(res->tx_deemph_gen1) | > > PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_3_5DB(res- > >tx_deemph_gen2_3p5db) | > > PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_6DB(res- > >tx_deemph_gen2_6db), > > @@ -1485,6 +1499,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8084", .data = &ops_1_0_0 }, > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > > + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-msm8996", .data = &ops_2_3_2 }, > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &ops_2_3_3 }, > > > > -- > regards, > Stan
On 5/13/20 3:54 PM, ansuelsmth@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi Ansuel, >> >> On 5/1/20 1:06 AM, Ansuel Smith wrote: >>> From: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> >>> >>> Add tx term offset support to pcie qcom driver need in some revision of >>> the ipq806x SoC. >>> Ipq8064 have tx term offset set to 7. >>> Ipq8064-v2 revision and ipq8065 have the tx term offset set to 0. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>> index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c >>> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ >>> #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 >>> >>> #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 >>> +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, >> 16) >> >> The mask definition is not correct. Should be GENMASK(20, 16) >> >>> +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) >>> + >>> #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C >>> #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) >>> #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) >>> @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { >>> u32 tx_swing_full; >>> u32 tx_swing_low; >>> u32 rx0_eq; >>> + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; >>> }; >>> >>> struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { >>> @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int >> qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) >>> if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) >>> return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); >>> >>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) >>> + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; >> >> Before your change the phy_tx0_term_offser was 0 for apq8064, but here >> you change it to 7, why? >> > > apq8064 board should use qcom,pcie-apq8064 right? This should be set to 0 > only with pcie-ipq8064 compatible. Tell me if I'm wrong. Sorry, my fault. I read the compatible check above as apq8064 but it is ipq.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c index da8058fd1925..372d2c8508b5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ #define PCIE_CAP_CPL_TIMEOUT_DISABLE 0x10 #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL 0x40 +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(12, 16) +#define PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 16) + #define PCIE20_PARF_PHY_REFCLK 0x4C #define PHY_REFCLK_SSP_EN BIT(16) #define PHY_REFCLK_USE_PAD BIT(12) @@ -118,6 +121,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_1_0 { u32 tx_swing_full; u32 tx_swing_low; u32 rx0_eq; + u8 phy_tx0_term_offset; }; struct qcom_pcie_resources_1_0_0 { @@ -318,6 +322,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) if (IS_ERR(res->ext_reset)) return PTR_ERR(res->ext_reset); + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-ipq8064")) + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 7; + else + res->phy_tx0_term_offset = 0; + res->phy_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "phy"); return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(res->phy_reset); } @@ -402,6 +411,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_1_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) /* enable PCIe clocks and resets */ qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, BIT(0), 0); + /* set TX termination offset */ + qcom_clear_and_set_dword(pcie->parf + PCIE20_PARF_PHY_CTRL, + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET_MASK, + PHY_CTRL_PHY_TX0_TERM_OFFSET(res->phy_tx0_term_offset)); + writel(PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN1(res->tx_deemph_gen1) | PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_3_5DB(res->tx_deemph_gen2_3p5db) | PCS_DEEMPH_TX_DEEMPH_GEN2_6DB(res->tx_deemph_gen2_6db), @@ -1485,6 +1499,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8084", .data = &ops_1_0_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-apq8064", .data = &ops_2_1_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-msm8996", .data = &ops_2_3_2 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &ops_2_3_3 },