| Message ID | 20200516031956.2605-7-mcgrof@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | block: fix blktrace debugfs use after free | expand |
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 03:19:55AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > We use one blktrace per request_queue, that means one per the entire > disk. So we cannot run one blktrace on say /dev/vda and then /dev/vda1, > or just two calls on /dev/vda. > > We check for concurrent setup only at the very end of the blktrace setup though. Too long line in the changelog. Otherwise this looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On 2020-05-15 20:19, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > [ ... ] Once Christoph's comments are addressed, feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c index 6c10a1427de2..ac6650828d49 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ * Copyright (C) 2006 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> * */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/blkdev.h> #include <linux/blktrace_api.h> @@ -493,6 +496,16 @@ static int do_blk_trace_setup(struct request_queue *q, char *name, dev_t dev, */ strreplace(buts->name, '/', '_'); + /* + * bdev can be NULL, as with scsi-generic, this is a helpful as + * we can be. + */ + if (q->blk_trace) { + pr_warn("Concurrent blktraces are not allowed on %s\n", + buts->name); + return -EBUSY; + } + bt = kzalloc(sizeof(*bt), GFP_KERNEL); if (!bt) return -ENOMEM;
We use one blktrace per request_queue, that means one per the entire disk. So we cannot run one blktrace on say /dev/vda and then /dev/vda1, or just two calls on /dev/vda. We check for concurrent setup only at the very end of the blktrace setup though. If we try to run two concurrent blktraces on the same block device the second one will fail, and the first one seems to go on. However when one tries to kill the first one one will see things like this: The kernel will show these: ``` debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! `` And userspace just sees this error message for the second call: ``` blktrace /dev/nvme1n1 BLKTRACESETUP(2) /dev/nvme1n1 failed: 5/Input/output error ``` The first userspace process #1 will also claim that the files were taken underneath their nose as well. The files are taken away form the first process given that when the second blktrace fails, it will follow up with a BLKTRACESTOP and BLKTRACETEARDOWN. This means that even if go-happy process #1 is waiting for blktrace data, we *have* been asked to take teardown the blktrace. This can easily be reproduced with break-blktrace [0] run_0005.sh test. Just break out early if we know we're already going to fail, this will prevent trying to create the files all over again, which we know still exist. [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/break-blktrace Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)