| Message ID | 20200521074847.71406-2-yang.jie@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ASoC topology header parsing refinement | expand |
On 2020-05-21 9:48 AM, Keyon Jie wrote: > The check (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) makes no sense as it is > comparing two different enums, refine the element loading functions, and > log the information when the header is being parsed in the corresponding > parsing pass. > > Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> > --- > sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c > index 49875978a1ce..70c0ff7ce13f 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c > @@ -2636,6 +2636,17 @@ static int soc_tplg_manifest_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > return ret; > } > > +static int (*elem_load[])(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *) = { > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST] = soc_tplg_manifest_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR] = soc_tplg_vendor_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER] = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET] = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI] = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH] = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI] = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load, > + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK] = soc_tplg_link_elems_load, > +}; > + Do we really need private array for this? There is a separate soc_tplg_load_header function already. By separate, I mean an isolate scope for single task only - validating tplg headers. While I agree with the idea behind second patch of the series - removal of individual checks in favor of generic one - I believe said checks could be "inlined". See below. > /* validate header magic, size and type */ > static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) > @@ -2685,19 +2696,31 @@ static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > return -EINVAL; > } > > - if (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) > + return 1; > +} > + > +/* check and load the element for the current pass */ > +static int soc_pass_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > + struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr, > + unsigned int hdr_pass) > +{ > + if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { > dev_dbg(tplg->dev, > "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at pass %d\n", > hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, > hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); > + return elem_load[hdr_pass](tplg, hdr); > + } > > - return 1; > + return 0; > } Remove the function and merge its body into soc_tplg_load_header. > > /* check header type and call appropriate handler */ > static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) > { > + unsigned int hdr_pass; > + > tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); > > /* check for matching ID */ > @@ -2711,27 +2734,35 @@ static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: > - return soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: > - return soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: > - return soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: > - return soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: > - return soc_tplg_dai_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: > /* physical link configurations */ > - return soc_tplg_link_elems_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; > + break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: > - return soc_tplg_manifest_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; > + break; > default: > /* bespoke vendor data object */ > - return soc_tplg_vendor_load(tplg, hdr); > + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; > + break; > } > > - return 0; > + return soc_pass_load(tplg, hdr, hdr_pass); By having "log" code here we have one place for hdr validation, rather than two (the second being just an "if" to be fair..) and private array is no longer necessary. Local func ptr variable would take care of storing adequate function to call. > } > > /* process the topology file headers */ >
On 5/26/20 8:38 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > On 2020-05-21 9:48 AM, Keyon Jie wrote: >> The check (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) makes no sense as it is >> comparing two different enums, refine the element loading functions, and >> log the information when the header is being parsed in the corresponding >> parsing pass. >> >> Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c >> index 49875978a1ce..70c0ff7ce13f 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c >> @@ -2636,6 +2636,17 @@ static int soc_tplg_manifest_load(struct >> soc_tplg *tplg, >> return ret; >> } >> +static int (*elem_load[])(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr >> *) = { >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST] = soc_tplg_manifest_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR] = soc_tplg_vendor_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER] = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET] = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI] = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH] = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI] = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load, >> + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK] = soc_tplg_link_elems_load, >> +}; >> + > > Do we really need private array for this? There is a separate > soc_tplg_load_header function already. By separate, I mean an isolate > scope for single task only - validating tplg headers. While I agree with > the idea behind second patch of the series - removal of individual > checks in favor of generic one - I believe said checks could be > "inlined". See below. > >> /* validate header magic, size and type */ >> static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, >> struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) >> @@ -2685,19 +2696,31 @@ static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg >> *tplg, >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> - if (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +/* check and load the element for the current pass */ >> +static int soc_pass_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg, >> + struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr, >> + unsigned int hdr_pass) >> +{ >> + if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { >> dev_dbg(tplg->dev, >> "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at >> pass %d\n", >> hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, >> hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); >> + return elem_load[hdr_pass](tplg, hdr); >> + } >> - return 1; >> + return 0; >> } > > Remove the function and merge its body into soc_tplg_load_header. > >> /* check header type and call appropriate handler */we >> static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, >> struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) >> { >> + unsigned int hdr_pass; >> + >> tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); >> /* check for matching ID */ >> @@ -2711,27 +2734,35 @@ static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct >> soc_tplg *tplg, >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: >> - return soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: >> - return soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: >> - return soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: >> - return soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: >> - return soc_tplg_dai_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: >> /* physical link configurations */ >> - return soc_tplg_link_elems_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; >> + break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: >> - return soc_tplg_manifest_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; >> + break; >> default: >> /* bespoke vendor data object */ >> - return soc_tplg_vendor_load(tplg, hdr); >> + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; >> + break; >> } >> - return 0; >> + return soc_pass_load(tplg, hdr, hdr_pass); > > By having "log" code here we have one place for hdr validation, rather > than two (the second being just an "if" to be fair..) and private array > is no longer necessary. Local func ptr variable would take care of > storing adequate function to call. Hi Cezary, so what you suggested above is changing the soc_tplg_load_header() to be something like this, right? static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) { unsigned int hdr_pass; int (*elem_load)(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *); tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); /* check for matching ID */ if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->index) != tplg->req_index && tplg->req_index != SND_SOC_TPLG_INDEX_ALL) return 0; tplg->index = le32_to_cpu(hdr->index); switch (le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) { case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; elem_load = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; elem_load = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; elem_load = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: /* physical link configurations */ hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; elem_load = soc_tplg_link_elems_load; break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; elem_load = soc_tplg_manifest_load; break; default: /* bespoke vendor data object */ hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; elem_load = soc_tplg_vendor_load; break; } if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { dev_dbg(tplg->dev, "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at pass %d\n", hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); return elem_load(tplg, hdr); } return 0; } I am also fine with this, though I thought my previous version looks more organized and not so error-prone as we need 8 more assignation here. Mark, Pierre, preference about this? Thanks, ~Keyon > >> } >> /* process the topology file headers */ >>
On 2020-05-26 4:45 PM, Keyon Jie wrote: > On 5/26/20 8:38 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >> On 2020-05-21 9:48 AM, Keyon Jie wrote: >> By having "log" code here we have one place for hdr validation, rather >> than two (the second being just an "if" to be fair..) and private >> array is no longer necessary. Local func ptr variable would take care >> of storing adequate function to call. > > Hi Cezary, so what you suggested above is changing the > soc_tplg_load_header() to be something like this, right? > > > static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, > struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) > { > unsigned int hdr_pass; > int (*elem_load)(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *); > > tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); > > /* check for matching ID */ > if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->index) != tplg->req_index && > tplg->req_index != SND_SOC_TPLG_INDEX_ALL) > return 0; > > tplg->index = le32_to_cpu(hdr->index); > > switch (le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) { > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; > elem_load = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; > elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; > elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; > elem_load = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; > elem_load = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: > /* physical link configurations */ > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; > elem_load = soc_tplg_link_elems_load; > break; > case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; > elem_load = soc_tplg_manifest_load; > break; > default: > /* bespoke vendor data object */ > hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; > elem_load = soc_tplg_vendor_load; > break; > } > > if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { > dev_dbg(tplg->dev, > "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at > pass %d\n", > hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, > hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); > return elem_load(tplg, hdr); > } > > return 0; > } > > > I am also fine with this, though I thought my previous version looks > more organized and not so error-prone as we need 8 more assignation here. > > Mark, Pierre, preference about this? > > Thanks, > ~Keyon > Another option, if you want to reduce assignment count, is to keep soc_pass_load while still removing the private map. Said soc_pass_load would require declaration update to accept function ptr on top of what's already there. In consequence, soc_tplg_load_header becomes a switch-case with a bunch of case X: return soc_pass_load(tplg, hdr, pass=_MY_PASS (e.g. SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR), elem_load=_MY_LOAD_FUNC (e.g. soc_tplg_vendor_load)) Czarek
On 5/26/20 11:30 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > On 2020-05-26 4:45 PM, Keyon Jie wrote: >> On 5/26/20 8:38 PM, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >>> On 2020-05-21 9:48 AM, Keyon Jie wrote: > >>> By having "log" code here we have one place for hdr validation, >>> rather than two (the second being just an "if" to be fair..) and >>> private array is no longer necessary. Local func ptr variable would >>> take care of storing adequate function to call. >> >> Hi Cezary, so what you suggested above is changing the >> soc_tplg_load_header() to be something like this, right? >> >> >> static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, >> struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) >> { >> unsigned int hdr_pass; >> int (*elem_load)(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *); >> >> tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); >> >> /* check for matching ID */ >> if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->index) != tplg->req_index && >> tplg->req_index != SND_SOC_TPLG_INDEX_ALL) >> return 0; >> >> tplg->index = le32_to_cpu(hdr->index); >> >> switch (le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) { >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: >> /* physical link configurations */ >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_link_elems_load; >> break; >> case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_manifest_load; >> break; >> default: >> /* bespoke vendor data object */ >> hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; >> elem_load = soc_tplg_vendor_load; >> break; >> } >> >> if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { >> dev_dbg(tplg->dev, >> "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at >> pass %d\n", >> hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, >> hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); >> return elem_load(tplg, hdr); >> } >> >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> I am also fine with this, though I thought my previous version looks >> more organized and not so error-prone as we need 8 more assignation here. >> >> Mark, Pierre, preference about this? >> >> Thanks, >> ~Keyon >> > > Another option, if you want to reduce assignment count, is to keep > soc_pass_load while still removing the private map. Said soc_pass_load > would require declaration update to accept function ptr on top of what's > already there. > > In consequence, soc_tplg_load_header becomes a switch-case with a bunch of > case X: > return soc_pass_load(tplg, hdr, > pass=_MY_PASS > (e.g. SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR), > elem_load=_MY_LOAD_FUNC > (e.g. soc_tplg_vendor_load)) I would prefer to use the assignment one, let me update the series now. Thanks, ~Keyon > > Czarek
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c index 49875978a1ce..70c0ff7ce13f 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c @@ -2636,6 +2636,17 @@ static int soc_tplg_manifest_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg, return ret; } +static int (*elem_load[])(struct soc_tplg *, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *) = { + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST] = soc_tplg_manifest_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR] = soc_tplg_vendor_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER] = soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET] = soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI] = soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH] = soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI] = soc_tplg_dai_elems_load, + [SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK] = soc_tplg_link_elems_load, +}; + /* validate header magic, size and type */ static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) @@ -2685,19 +2696,31 @@ static int soc_valid_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, return -EINVAL; } - if (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) + return 1; +} + +/* check and load the element for the current pass */ +static int soc_pass_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg, + struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr, + unsigned int hdr_pass) +{ + if (tplg->pass == hdr_pass) { dev_dbg(tplg->dev, "ASoC: Got 0x%x bytes of type %d version %d vendor %d at pass %d\n", hdr->payload_size, hdr->type, hdr->version, hdr->vendor_type, tplg->pass); + return elem_load[hdr_pass](tplg, hdr); + } - return 1; + return 0; } /* check header type and call appropriate handler */ static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr) { + unsigned int hdr_pass; + tplg->pos = tplg->hdr_pos + sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr); /* check for matching ID */ @@ -2711,27 +2734,35 @@ static int soc_tplg_load_header(struct soc_tplg *tplg, case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MIXER: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_ENUM: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES: - return soc_tplg_kcontrol_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MIXER; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_GRAPH: - return soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_GRAPH; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAPM_WIDGET: - return soc_tplg_dapm_widget_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_WIDGET; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM: - return soc_tplg_pcm_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_PCM_DAI; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI: - return soc_tplg_dai_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_BE_DAI; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_DAI_LINK: case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BACKEND_LINK: /* physical link configurations */ - return soc_tplg_link_elems_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_LINK; + break; case SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST: - return soc_tplg_manifest_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_MANIFEST; + break; default: /* bespoke vendor data object */ - return soc_tplg_vendor_load(tplg, hdr); + hdr_pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_VENDOR; + break; } - return 0; + return soc_pass_load(tplg, hdr, hdr_pass); } /* process the topology file headers */
The check (tplg->pass == le32_to_cpu(hdr->type)) makes no sense as it is comparing two different enums, refine the element loading functions, and log the information when the header is being parsed in the corresponding parsing pass. Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> --- sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)