Message ID | 20200526225849.20985-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND,v2] mtd: physmap: Add Baikal-T1 physically mapped ROMs support | expand |
Hi, On 27/05/20 4:28 am, Serge Semin wrote: > Baikal-T1 Boot Controller provides an access to a RO storages, which are > physically mapped into the MMIO space. In particularly there are the > Internal ROM embedded into the SoC with a pre-installed firmware, > externally attached SPI flash (also accessed in the read-only mode) and a > memory region, which mirrors one of them in accordance with the currently > enabled system boot mode (also called Boot ROM). > > This commit adds the ROMs support to the physmap driver of the MTD kernel > subsystem. Currently the driver only supports the Internal ROM, since > physically mapped SPI flash is utilized by the Baikal-T1 System Boot > Controller driver so won't be available over mtd-rom interface and > the Boot ROM mirror mapping has dependency on the SPI flash mapping > switcher available within the SPI flash registers space. The real access > to the Boot ROM memory will be added in future. > > Note we had to create a dedicated code for the ROMs since read from the > corresponding memory regions must be done via the dword-aligned addresses. > In addition the driver in future states will have to take into account > that the Boot ROM might mirror the SPI flash region so before accessing it > the SPI flash direct mapping must be enabled by means of a dedicated flag > in the Baikal-T1 System SPI register flag. > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Maxim Kaurkin <Maxim.Kaurkin@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Ekaterina Skachko <Ekaterina.Skachko@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Vadim Vlasov <V.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Alexey Kolotnikov <Alexey.Kolotnikov@baikalelectronics.ru> > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > Miquel, Richard, Vignesh, the merge window is upon us, please review/merge > in/whatever this patch. > > This patchset is rebased and tested on the mainline Linux kernel 5.7-rc4: > base-commit: 0e698dfa2822 ("Linux 5.7-rc4") > tag: v5.7-rc4 > > New vendor prefix will be added in the framework of the next patchset: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/6/1047 Sorry, driver patch and dt bindings have to be proposed together... Driver cannot be accepted ahead of DT bindings been reviewed. > > Note since the next patchset is no longer relevant (as a result of a > discussion with @Lee and @Miquel) > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/6/421 > and Boot ROM mtd is currently unsupported I can freely submit this patch, > while in former case I had to wait for the patchset merged. > [...] > +static void __xipram bt1_rom_map_copy_from(struct map_info *map, > + void *to, unsigned long from, > + ssize_t len) > +{ > + void __iomem *src = map->virt + from; > + ssize_t shift, chunk; > + u32 data; > + > + if (len <= 0 || from >= map->size) > + return; > + > + /* Make sure we don't go over the map limit. */ > + len = min_t(ssize_t, map->size - from, len); > + > + /* > + * Since requested data size can be pretty big we have to implement > + * the copy procedure as optimal as possible. That's why it's split > + * up into the next three stages: unaligned head, aligned body, > + * unaligned tail. > + */ > + shift = (ssize_t)src & 0x3; > + if (shift) { > + chunk = min_t(ssize_t, 4 - shift, len); > + data = readl_relaxed(src - shift); > + memcpy(to, &data + shift, chunk); > + src += chunk; > + to += chunk; > + len -= chunk; > + } > + > + while (len >= 4) { > + data = readl_relaxed(src); > + memcpy(to, &data, 4); > + src += 4; > + to += 4; > + len -= 4; > + } > + > + if (len) { > + data = readl_relaxed(src); > + memcpy(to, &data, len); > + } > +} > + > +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_read(struct map_info *map, > + unsigned long ofs) > +{ > + map_word ret; > + > + ret.x[0] = 0xFF; > + > + return ret; > +} Why define dummy_io for "baikal,bt1-boot-rom"? I don't see any use of adding a driver that always reads 0xFFs > + > +/* > + * Currently Baikal-T1 SoC internal ROM is only supported. Boot ROM region is > + * dummy-data filled for now since in case of the system booted up from an > + * external SPI flash the ROM will mirror the Baikal-T1 System Boot SPI direct > + * mapping memory region. That region can be only accessed when transparent > + * mode is enabled, which we unable to do here because this feature is provided > + * by the SPI controller config space occupied by the corresponding driver. > + * In future we'll export the mode setting method from the Baikal-T1 System > + * Boot SPI Controller driver to also have the Boot ROM supported here. > + */ > +static const struct of_device_id bt1_rom_of_match[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-int-rom", > + .data = &bt1_rom_normal_io > + }, > + { > + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-boot-rom", > + .data = &bt1_rom_dummy_io > + }, > + { } [...] Regards Vignesh
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:36:55PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/05/20 4:28 am, Serge Semin wrote: > > Baikal-T1 Boot Controller provides an access to a RO storages, which are > > physically mapped into the MMIO space. In particularly there are the > > Internal ROM embedded into the SoC with a pre-installed firmware, > > externally attached SPI flash (also accessed in the read-only mode) and a > > memory region, which mirrors one of them in accordance with the currently > > enabled system boot mode (also called Boot ROM). > > > > This commit adds the ROMs support to the physmap driver of the MTD kernel > > subsystem. Currently the driver only supports the Internal ROM, since > > physically mapped SPI flash is utilized by the Baikal-T1 System Boot > > Controller driver so won't be available over mtd-rom interface and > > the Boot ROM mirror mapping has dependency on the SPI flash mapping > > switcher available within the SPI flash registers space. The real access > > to the Boot ROM memory will be added in future. > > > > Note we had to create a dedicated code for the ROMs since read from the > > corresponding memory regions must be done via the dword-aligned addresses. > > In addition the driver in future states will have to take into account > > that the Boot ROM might mirror the SPI flash region so before accessing it > > the SPI flash direct mapping must be enabled by means of a dedicated flag > > in the Baikal-T1 System SPI register flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Maxim Kaurkin <Maxim.Kaurkin@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Ekaterina Skachko <Ekaterina.Skachko@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Vadim Vlasov <V.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Alexey Kolotnikov <Alexey.Kolotnikov@baikalelectronics.ru> > > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org > > > > --- > > > > Miquel, Richard, Vignesh, the merge window is upon us, please review/merge > > in/whatever this patch. > > > > This patchset is rebased and tested on the mainline Linux kernel 5.7-rc4: > > base-commit: 0e698dfa2822 ("Linux 5.7-rc4") > > tag: v5.7-rc4 > > > > New vendor prefix will be added in the framework of the next patchset: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/6/1047 > > > Sorry, driver patch and dt bindings have to be proposed together... > Driver cannot be accepted ahead of DT bindings been reviewed. Understood. I'll fix it in v3. Thanks. > > > > > Note since the next patchset is no longer relevant (as a result of a > > discussion with @Lee and @Miquel) > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/6/421 > > and Boot ROM mtd is currently unsupported I can freely submit this patch, > > while in former case I had to wait for the patchset merged. > > > > [...] > > +static void __xipram bt1_rom_map_copy_from(struct map_info *map, > > + void *to, unsigned long from, > > + ssize_t len) > > +{ > > + void __iomem *src = map->virt + from; > > + ssize_t shift, chunk; > > + u32 data; > > + > > + if (len <= 0 || from >= map->size) > > + return; > > + > > + /* Make sure we don't go over the map limit. */ > > + len = min_t(ssize_t, map->size - from, len); > > + > > + /* > > + * Since requested data size can be pretty big we have to implement > > + * the copy procedure as optimal as possible. That's why it's split > > + * up into the next three stages: unaligned head, aligned body, > > + * unaligned tail. > > + */ > > + shift = (ssize_t)src & 0x3; > > + if (shift) { > > + chunk = min_t(ssize_t, 4 - shift, len); > > + data = readl_relaxed(src - shift); > > + memcpy(to, &data + shift, chunk); > > + src += chunk; > > + to += chunk; > > + len -= chunk; > > + } > > + > > + while (len >= 4) { > > + data = readl_relaxed(src); > > + memcpy(to, &data, 4); > > + src += 4; > > + to += 4; > > + len -= 4; > > + } > > + > > + if (len) { > > + data = readl_relaxed(src); > > + memcpy(to, &data, len); > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_read(struct map_info *map, > > + unsigned long ofs) > > +{ > > + map_word ret; > > + > > + ret.x[0] = 0xFF; > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > Why define dummy_io for "baikal,bt1-boot-rom"? I don't see any use of > adding a driver that always reads 0xFFs This is supposed to be temporary solution for the baikal,bt1-boot-rom ROM. The Boot ROM mirror might reflect either an embedded firmware or the SPI flash directly mapped into the memory. In former case there is no problem, we can freely read from the Boot ROM region. But in the later case the mirrored region (memory mapped SPI flash) is not always accessible. If normal Boot SPI controller is enabled, then the SPI flash mapping isn't accessible (any attempt will cause a bus-error). In order to fix this we'd need a mutual exclusive lock, which would disable the SPI controller while the mirrored memory mapped SPI flash region needs to be accessed. Such mechanism isn't currently implemented, but it will in be in the framework of my patch created for the SPI subsystem. My idea was to just provide a dummy callback for now and replace it with normal IO-methods with mutual exclusive lock-unlocks when the corresponding SPI driver is accepted. -Sergey > > > > + > > +/* > > + * Currently Baikal-T1 SoC internal ROM is only supported. Boot ROM region is > > + * dummy-data filled for now since in case of the system booted up from an > > + * external SPI flash the ROM will mirror the Baikal-T1 System Boot SPI direct > > + * mapping memory region. That region can be only accessed when transparent > > + * mode is enabled, which we unable to do here because this feature is provided > > + * by the SPI controller config space occupied by the corresponding driver. > > + * In future we'll export the mode setting method from the Baikal-T1 System > > + * Boot SPI Controller driver to also have the Boot ROM supported here. > > + */ > > +static const struct of_device_id bt1_rom_of_match[] = { > > + { > > + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-int-rom", > > + .data = &bt1_rom_normal_io > > + }, > > > + { > > + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-boot-rom", > > + .data = &bt1_rom_dummy_io > > + }, > > + { } > > > > [...] > > Regards > Vignesh
On 28/05/20 4:12 pm, Serge Semin wrote: [...] >>> + >>> +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_read(struct map_info *map, >>> + unsigned long ofs) >>> +{ >>> + map_word ret; >>> + >>> + ret.x[0] = 0xFF; >>> + >>> + return ret; >>> +} >> Why define dummy_io for "baikal,bt1-boot-rom"? I don't see any use of >> adding a driver that always reads 0xFFs > This is supposed to be temporary solution for the baikal,bt1-boot-rom ROM. > The Boot ROM mirror might reflect either an embedded firmware or the SPI flash > directly mapped into the memory. In former case there is no problem, we can > freely read from the Boot ROM region. But in the later case the mirrored region > (memory mapped SPI flash) is not always accessible. If normal Boot SPI > controller is enabled, then the SPI flash mapping isn't accessible (any attempt > will cause a bus-error). In order to fix this we'd need a mutual exclusive lock, > which would disable the SPI controller while the mirrored memory mapped SPI flash > region needs to be accessed. Such mechanism isn't currently implemented, but it > will in be in the framework of my patch created for the SPI subsystem. > > My idea was to just provide a dummy callback for now and replace it with normal > IO-methods with mutual exclusive lock-unlocks when the corresponding SPI driver > is accepted. > Yes I understand, but I don't see any advantage for end user by providing dummy calls... So please don't add the callbacks until they implement proper functionality
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:35:41PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > > On 28/05/20 4:12 pm, Serge Semin wrote: > [...] > >>> + > >>> +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_read(struct map_info *map, > >>> + unsigned long ofs) > >>> +{ > >>> + map_word ret; > >>> + > >>> + ret.x[0] = 0xFF; > >>> + > >>> + return ret; > >>> +} > >> Why define dummy_io for "baikal,bt1-boot-rom"? I don't see any use of > >> adding a driver that always reads 0xFFs > > This is supposed to be temporary solution for the baikal,bt1-boot-rom ROM. > > The Boot ROM mirror might reflect either an embedded firmware or the SPI flash > > directly mapped into the memory. In former case there is no problem, we can > > freely read from the Boot ROM region. But in the later case the mirrored region > > (memory mapped SPI flash) is not always accessible. If normal Boot SPI > > controller is enabled, then the SPI flash mapping isn't accessible (any attempt > > will cause a bus-error). In order to fix this we'd need a mutual exclusive lock, > > which would disable the SPI controller while the mirrored memory mapped SPI flash > > region needs to be accessed. Such mechanism isn't currently implemented, but it > > will in be in the framework of my patch created for the SPI subsystem. > > > > My idea was to just provide a dummy callback for now and replace it with normal > > IO-methods with mutual exclusive lock-unlocks when the corresponding SPI driver > > is accepted. > > > > Yes I understand, but I don't see any advantage for end user by > providing dummy calls... So please don't add the callbacks until they > implement proper functionality Agreed. I'll remove the Baikal-T1 Boot ROM support in the next version. -Sergey
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig index b28225a7c4f3..60b4285cd86a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig @@ -107,6 +107,14 @@ config MTD_PHYSMAP_IXP4XX This provides some extra DT physmap parsing for the Intel IXP4xx platforms, some elaborate endianness handling in particular. +config MTD_PHYSMAP_BT1_ROM + bool "Baikal-T1 Boot ROMs OF-based physical memory map handling" + depends on (MIPS_BAIKAL_T1 && MTD_PHYSMAP_OF) || COMPILE_TEST + select MTD_COMPLEX_MAPPINGS + help + This provides some extra DT physmap parsing for the Baikal-T1 + platforms, some detection and setting up ROMs-specific accessors. + config MTD_PHYSMAP_GPIO_ADDR bool "GPIO-assisted Flash Chip Support" depends on MTD_PHYSMAP diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile index c0da86a5d26f..45f3a151f568 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ physmap-objs-y += physmap-core.o physmap-objs-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_VERSATILE) += physmap-versatile.o physmap-objs-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_GEMINI) += physmap-gemini.o physmap-objs-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_IXP4XX) += physmap-ixp4xx.o +physmap-objs-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_BT1_ROM) += physmap-bt1-rom.o physmap-objs := $(physmap-objs-y) obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP) += physmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PISMO) += pismo.o diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..55149af18729 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (C) 2020 BAIKAL ELECTRONICS, JSC + * + * Authors: + * Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> + * + * Baikal-T1 Physically Mapped ROMs driver + */ +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/bits.h> +#include <linux/mtd/map.h> +#include <linux/mtd/xip.h> +#include <linux/string.h> + +#include "physmap-bt1-rom.h" + +struct bt1_rom_io { + map_word (*read)(struct map_info *map, unsigned long ofs); + void (*copy_from)(struct map_info *map, void *to, unsigned long from, + ssize_t len); +}; + +/* + * Baikal-T1 SoC ROMs are only accessible by the dword-aligned instructions. + * We have to take this into account when implementing the data read-methods. + * Note there is no need in bothering with endianness, since both Baikal-T1 + * CPU and MMIO are LE. + */ +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_map_read(struct map_info *map, + unsigned long ofs) +{ + void __iomem *src = map->virt + ofs; + unsigned long shift; + map_word ret; + u32 data; + + /* Read data within offset dword. */ + shift = (unsigned long)src & 0x3; + data = readl_relaxed(src - shift); + if (!shift) { + ret.x[0] = data; + return ret; + } + ret.x[0] = data >> (shift * BITS_PER_BYTE); + + /* Read data from the next dword. */ + shift = 4 - shift; + if (ofs + shift >= map->size) + return ret; + + data = readl_relaxed(src + shift); + ret.x[0] |= data << (shift * BITS_PER_BYTE); + + return ret; +} + +static void __xipram bt1_rom_map_copy_from(struct map_info *map, + void *to, unsigned long from, + ssize_t len) +{ + void __iomem *src = map->virt + from; + ssize_t shift, chunk; + u32 data; + + if (len <= 0 || from >= map->size) + return; + + /* Make sure we don't go over the map limit. */ + len = min_t(ssize_t, map->size - from, len); + + /* + * Since requested data size can be pretty big we have to implement + * the copy procedure as optimal as possible. That's why it's split + * up into the next three stages: unaligned head, aligned body, + * unaligned tail. + */ + shift = (ssize_t)src & 0x3; + if (shift) { + chunk = min_t(ssize_t, 4 - shift, len); + data = readl_relaxed(src - shift); + memcpy(to, &data + shift, chunk); + src += chunk; + to += chunk; + len -= chunk; + } + + while (len >= 4) { + data = readl_relaxed(src); + memcpy(to, &data, 4); + src += 4; + to += 4; + len -= 4; + } + + if (len) { + data = readl_relaxed(src); + memcpy(to, &data, len); + } +} + +static map_word __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_read(struct map_info *map, + unsigned long ofs) +{ + map_word ret; + + ret.x[0] = 0xFF; + + return ret; +} + +static void __xipram bt1_rom_dummy_copy_from(struct map_info *map, + void *to, unsigned long from, + ssize_t len) +{ + if (len <= 0 || from >= map->size) + return; + + len = min_t(ssize_t, map->size - from, len); + + memset(to, 0xFF, len); +} + +static const struct bt1_rom_io bt1_rom_normal_io = { + .read = bt1_rom_map_read, + .copy_from = bt1_rom_map_copy_from +}; + +static const struct bt1_rom_io bt1_rom_dummy_io = { + .read = bt1_rom_dummy_read, + .copy_from = bt1_rom_dummy_copy_from +}; + +/* + * Currently Baikal-T1 SoC internal ROM is only supported. Boot ROM region is + * dummy-data filled for now since in case of the system booted up from an + * external SPI flash the ROM will mirror the Baikal-T1 System Boot SPI direct + * mapping memory region. That region can be only accessed when transparent + * mode is enabled, which we unable to do here because this feature is provided + * by the SPI controller config space occupied by the corresponding driver. + * In future we'll export the mode setting method from the Baikal-T1 System + * Boot SPI Controller driver to also have the Boot ROM supported here. + */ +static const struct of_device_id bt1_rom_of_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-int-rom", + .data = &bt1_rom_normal_io + }, + { + .compatible = "baikal,bt1-boot-rom", + .data = &bt1_rom_dummy_io + }, + { } +}; + +int of_flash_probe_bt1_rom(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct device_node *np, + struct map_info *map) +{ + const struct of_device_id *match; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + const struct bt1_rom_io *io; + + /* It's supposed to be read-only MTD. */ + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "mtd-rom")) { + dev_info(dev, "No mtd-rom compatible string\n"); + return 0; + } + + /* Multiplatform guard. */ + match = of_match_device(bt1_rom_of_match, dev); + if (!match) + return 0; + + /* Sanity check the device parameters retrieved from DTB. */ + if (map->bankwidth != 4) + dev_warn(dev, "Bank width is supposed to be 32 bits wide\n"); + + io = match->data; + map->read = io->read; + map->copy_from = io->copy_from; + + return 0; +} diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.h b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5874f2acf929 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.h @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/mtd/map.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_BT1_ROM +int of_flash_probe_bt1_rom(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct device_node *np, + struct map_info *map); +#else +static inline +int of_flash_probe_bt1_rom(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct device_node *np, + struct map_info *map) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c index 8f7f966fa9a7..a0716da933b5 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include "physmap-gemini.h" #include "physmap-ixp4xx.h" #include "physmap-versatile.h" +#include "physmap-bt1-rom.h" struct physmap_flash_info { unsigned int nmaps; @@ -383,6 +384,10 @@ static int physmap_flash_of_init(struct platform_device *dev) if (err) return err; + err = of_flash_probe_bt1_rom(dev, dp, &info->maps[i]); + if (err) + return err; + /* * On some platforms (e.g. MPC5200) a direct 1:1 mapping * may cause problems with JFFS2 usage, as the local bus (LPB)
Baikal-T1 Boot Controller provides an access to a RO storages, which are physically mapped into the MMIO space. In particularly there are the Internal ROM embedded into the SoC with a pre-installed firmware, externally attached SPI flash (also accessed in the read-only mode) and a memory region, which mirrors one of them in accordance with the currently enabled system boot mode (also called Boot ROM). This commit adds the ROMs support to the physmap driver of the MTD kernel subsystem. Currently the driver only supports the Internal ROM, since physically mapped SPI flash is utilized by the Baikal-T1 System Boot Controller driver so won't be available over mtd-rom interface and the Boot ROM mirror mapping has dependency on the SPI flash mapping switcher available within the SPI flash registers space. The real access to the Boot ROM memory will be added in future. Note we had to create a dedicated code for the ROMs since read from the corresponding memory regions must be done via the dword-aligned addresses. In addition the driver in future states will have to take into account that the Boot ROM might mirror the SPI flash region so before accessing it the SPI flash direct mapping must be enabled by means of a dedicated flag in the Baikal-T1 System SPI register flag. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Maxim Kaurkin <Maxim.Kaurkin@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Ekaterina Skachko <Ekaterina.Skachko@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Vadim Vlasov <V.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Alexey Kolotnikov <Alexey.Kolotnikov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org --- Miquel, Richard, Vignesh, the merge window is upon us, please review/merge in/whatever this patch. This patchset is rebased and tested on the mainline Linux kernel 5.7-rc4: base-commit: 0e698dfa2822 ("Linux 5.7-rc4") tag: v5.7-rc4 New vendor prefix will be added in the framework of the next patchset: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/6/1047 Note since the next patchset is no longer relevant (as a result of a discussion with @Lee and @Miquel) https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/6/421 and Boot ROM mtd is currently unsupported I can freely submit this patch, while in former case I had to wait for the patchset merged. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200508100905.5854-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru/ Changelog v2: - Resend. --- drivers/mtd/maps/Kconfig | 8 ++ drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.h | 17 +++ drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-core.c | 5 + 5 files changed, 220 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.c create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/maps/physmap-bt1-rom.h