diff mbox series

[11/15] mmc: sdhci: use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where appropriate

Message ID 20200602092059.32146-1-piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series forward MSIx vector enable error code in pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity | expand

Commit Message

Piotr Stankiewicz June 2, 2020, 9:20 a.m. UTC
Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c     | 3 +--
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Ulf Hansson June 2, 2020, 12:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 11:21, Piotr Stankiewicz
<piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
> of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c     | 3 +--
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> index fd76aa672e02..d14997f9cbf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static void gli_pcie_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>  {
>         int ret;
>
> -       ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1,
> -                                   PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> +       ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
>         if (ret < 0) {
>                 pr_warn("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, error=%d\n",
>                        mmc_hostname(slot->host->mmc), ret);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> index fa8105087d68..498c51207bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> @@ -470,8 +470,7 @@ static void sdhci_pci_o2_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip,
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1,
> -                                   PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> +       ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
>         if (ret < 0) {
>                 pr_err("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, err=%d\n",
>                        mmc_hostname(host->mmc), ret);
> --
> 2.17.2
>
Adrian Hunter June 2, 2020, 1:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/06/20 12:20 pm, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
> of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c     | 3 +--
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> index fd76aa672e02..d14997f9cbf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
> @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ static void gli_pcie_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1,
> -				    PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> +	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		pr_warn("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, error=%d\n",
>  		       mmc_hostname(slot->host->mmc), ret);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> index fa8105087d68..498c51207bfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
> @@ -470,8 +470,7 @@ static void sdhci_pci_o2_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1,
> -				    PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> +	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		pr_err("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, err=%d\n",
>  		       mmc_hostname(host->mmc), ret);
>
Christoph Hellwig June 3, 2020, 5:26 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
> of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>

So this crap now shows up piecemail on various lists?  Indepent of that
it seems like a bad idea to start with, bombing people with patches that
apparently depend on something you did first but they are not Cced on
is just an amazingly bad idea.  Don't do that ever.
Piotr Stankiewicz June 3, 2020, 6:16 a.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:27 AM
> To: Stankiewicz, Piotr <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
> Cc: Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] mmc: sdhci: use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where
> appropriate
> 
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> > Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
> > of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> 
> So this crap now shows up piecemail on various lists?  Indepent of that it seems
> like a bad idea to start with, bombing people with patches that apparently
> depend on something you did first but they are not Cced on is just an amazingly
> bad idea.  Don't do that ever.

I've sent the cover letter for the series to everyone question, to avoid spamming
people with irrelevant patches, but so that they can find the rest if necessary.
What would be a preferable thing to do?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
index fd76aa672e02..d14997f9cbf9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
@@ -271,8 +271,7 @@  static void gli_pcie_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1,
-				    PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
+	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(slot->chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_warn("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, error=%d\n",
 		       mmc_hostname(slot->host->mmc), ret);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
index fa8105087d68..498c51207bfb 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c
@@ -470,8 +470,7 @@  static void sdhci_pci_o2_enable_msi(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1,
-				    PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
+	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(chip->pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_err("%s: enable PCI MSI failed, err=%d\n",
 		       mmc_hostname(host->mmc), ret);